Elucidation of the sweetening mechanism of sweet orange fruit aroma compounds on sucrose solution using sensory evaluation, electronic tongue, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation

Sweetness enhancement through aroma has been suggested as a strategy to mitigate sugar addition in foods, but such enhancement depends on the type of aroma. Ethyl propanoate, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, octyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, butyl hexanoate, γ-terpinene, nootkatone, and aceto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food science & technology 2024-08, Vol.205, p.116555, Article 116555
Hauptverfasser: Xiao, ZuoBing, Gao, JiaWen, Niu, YunWei, Wang, Zhaogai, Zhou, Rujuan, Zhang, Jing, Zhu, JianCai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Sweetness enhancement through aroma has been suggested as a strategy to mitigate sugar addition in foods, but such enhancement depends on the type of aroma. Ethyl propanoate, ethyl 2-methylbutanoate, octyl acetate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, butyl hexanoate, γ-terpinene, nootkatone, and acetophenone with fruity aroma from sweet orange were selected as the objects to investigate the sweetening effect of aroma compounds in a 5% sucrose solution using an artificial sensory tongue and an electronic tongue. The results showed that nine aroma compounds exerted a significant effect on the sweetness, among which ethyl butanoate, ethyl propanoate, and ethyl 2-methylbutanoate imparted a more comfortable effect. Subsequently, the mechanism of their sweetening action was studied by molecular simulation. Molecular docking results indicated that the binding free energy decreased below −5.9 kcal/mol in the presence of aroma compounds, indicating that sucrose was more tightly docked to the sweet taste receptor. Molecular dynamics (MD) further implied that under the influence of ethyl butanoate, the stable time of binding was advanced by 15 ns, and the amino acids forming hydrogen bonds changed from LYS65, ASP278, GLU302, SER165, and SER303 to SER165, ASP142, LYS65, and GLU302. The interaction depends on hydrogen bonds, water bridges, and hydrophobic forces. •Nine fruity aroma compounds can enhance the perception of sucrose sweetness.•The decrease in binding energy may represent the increase of sweetness.•Hydrogen bonding interactions are the main force between sucrose and T1R2/T1R3.•Van der Waals is the key to a sweetening of ethyl butanoate in sucrose solution.
ISSN:0023-6438
DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116555