Economy-wide impact of targeting and repurposing fossil fuel subsidies in Malaysia

Fossil fuel subsidy reform is a critical strategy for fostering cleaner energy systems and promoting sustainable development. The Malaysian government has signalled commitments to implement a targeted fuel subsidy reform where vulnerable households would be unaffected by the direct impact of higher fuel prices even after the reform. But despite this commitment, little is known about the economy-wide impact of the reform. This study employs a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to examine the economic, social, and environmental impact of a targeted fuel subsidy removal in Malaysia under a spontaneous and gradual implementation scenario. The research also explores the impact of direct cash transfers to households and reinvestment in key sectors of the economy in the aftermath of the reform. Results from the study show that subsidy removal brings positive gains to the Malaysian economy in the medium to long term. Sequencing the phaseout of subsidies, providing compensation to vulnerable households, and reinvesting in education, health, transportation, and food assistance helps to avoid short-term adverse effects on households and output. The study recommends the need for a gradual removal of fuel subsidies that is accompanied by cash transfers to vulnerable households and investment in key sectors of the economy. •We study the economy-wide impact of a targeted fuel subsidy reform in Malaysia.•Fuel subsidy removal brings positive gains in the medium and long term.•Short-term pains can be avoided by compensating vulnerable households.•A gradual removal of subsidy inflicts lesser harm on the economy and households.•Reinvesting fuel subsidy in key sectors enables economic and welfare recovery.