A review on disposal and utilization of phytoremediation plants containing heavy metals

The reasonable disposal of plant biomass containing heavy metals (HMs) is a difficult problem for the phytoremediation technology. This review summarizes current literature that introduces various disposal and utilization methods (heat treatment, extraction treatment, microbial treatment, compressio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 2021-12, Vol.226, p.112821-112821, Article 112821
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Zhongchuang, Tran, Khanh-Quang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The reasonable disposal of plant biomass containing heavy metals (HMs) is a difficult problem for the phytoremediation technology. This review summarizes current literature that introduces various disposal and utilization methods (heat treatment, extraction treatment, microbial treatment, compression landfill, and synthesis of nanomaterials) for phytoremediation plants with HMs. The operation process and technical parameters of each disposal method are different. HMs can migrate and transform in different disposal processes. Some disposal and utilization methods can get some by-products. The main purpose of this paper is to provide reference for technical parameters and characteristics of various disposal and utilization methods, so as to choose and use the appropriate method for the treatment of plant biomass containing HMs after phytoremediation. •There are various methods for the treatment of plant biomass with heavy metals.•Heavy metals can migrate and transform in different disposal processes.•The operation process and technical parameters of each disposal method are different.•Many factors should be considered in choosing a reasonable disposal method.•The combination of multiple disposal methods can be considered.
ISSN:0147-6513
1090-2414
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112821