Perfectionism profiles among college students: A person-centered approach to motivation, behavior, and emotion

•High rate of students experienced degrees of perfectionistic tendencies.•Asian Americans over-represented in profiles with high perfectionistic strivings.•Combinations of multiple outcomes revealed the distinct nature of each profile.•Growth mindset protects concerned perfectionists’ task value.•Fu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary educational psychology 2022-10, Vol.71, p.102110, Article 102110
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Shengjie, Muenks, Katherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•High rate of students experienced degrees of perfectionistic tendencies.•Asian Americans over-represented in profiles with high perfectionistic strivings.•Combinations of multiple outcomes revealed the distinct nature of each profile.•Growth mindset protects concerned perfectionists’ task value.•Future researchers should integrate motivation into perfectionism interventions. Perfectionism among college students has increased in the past three decades, yet studies of perfectionism in academic contexts are relatively scarce. This study used a person-centered approach to investigate associations between perfectionism profiles and academic indicators (i.e., motivation, behavior, and emotion), whether there are any gender or racial/ethnic differences in perfectionism profiles, and whether growth mindsets moderated associations between perfectionism profiles and academic indicators. Data were collected from 516 college students enrolled in math-related courses. Latent profile analysis revealed four distinct types of perfectionism characterized as Ambitious, Concerned, Perfectionist and Non-perfectionist. The Ambitious group was associated with the best academic indicators overall, whereas the Concerned group had the worst indicators. Students in the Perfectionist and Non-perfectionist groups exhibited more complex patterns across academic indicators, with those in the Perfectionist group having generally more positive motivational/behavioral indicators but more negative emotional indicators, and those in the Non-perfectionist group demonstrating the opposite pattern. Asian American students were over-represented in the Ambitious and Perfectionist groups. Additionally, growth mindset served as a protective factor for the Concerned and Non-perfectionist groups on motivational indicators (task value and perceived cost, respectively). Overall, this study highlights the importance of person-centered approaches and the inclusion of multiple academic indicators (i.e., motivational, behavioral, and emotional) to reveal the complex nature of perfectionism.
ISSN:0361-476X
1090-2384
DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102110