Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle assessment of power-to-methanol synthesis pathways

[Display omitted] •Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis of power-to-methanol.•Levelized cost ranges from $430 to $435/ton methanol under optimistic scenario.•The power-to-methanol would be competitive at electricity price below 3 cents/kWh.•Electricity emission factor of less than 130...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2020-11, Vol.278, p.115614, Article 115614
Hauptverfasser: Adnan, Muflih A., Kibria, Md Golam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis of power-to-methanol.•Levelized cost ranges from $430 to $435/ton methanol under optimistic scenario.•The power-to-methanol would be competitive at electricity price below 3 cents/kWh.•Electricity emission factor of less than 130 g CO2/kWh is required for climate benefits. The deployment of “Power-to-Methanol” technologies by exploiting electrochemical reactions with CO2 as feedstock has received traction lately; primarily due to the continuous drop in renewable electricity price. Here, we compare techno-economic and climate benefits of three emerging “Power-to-Methanol” routes, including one-step CO2-to-methanol electrolysis; two-step synthesis, involving H2O electrolysis; and three-step synthesis, involving H2O electrolysis, and CO2-to-CO electrolysis. This study identifies key economic drivers and sets the technological goals for “Power-to-Methanol” routes to be competitive. We report that under current techno-economic conditions, none of these three emerging routes are compelling with levelized cost $860–$1585/ton methanol, which is ~2–4 times higher than the current market price ($300/ton–$500/ton). However, under future conditions (notably electricity price 360 mA/cm2 (CO2-to-CO)), and energy efficiency >40%, which would make one- and three-step “Power-to-Methanol” routes economically and environmentally competitive over fossil-based process in future.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115614