Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients with Neurogenic Bladder: Does the Literature Support a Different Approach?

Purpose of Review In this review, the current literature available to patients and providers on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder will be discussed. Topics include bladder cancer epidemiology in the neurogenic population and unique features of this tu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current bladder dysfunction reports 2024, Vol.19 (2), p.185-194
Hauptverfasser: Bigarella, M. P., Richards, K. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose of Review In this review, the current literature available to patients and providers on the diagnosis and management of bladder cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder will be discussed. Topics include bladder cancer epidemiology in the neurogenic population and unique features of this tumor in this subset of patients, current screening recommendations, and differences in the treatment for this patient population, outlining specific changes in the surgical approach. Recent Findings Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) patients are living longer due to better care, and cancer is becoming more frequent. This is partly due to the aging of this population, as well as intrinsic factors related to the underlying condition or urinary diversion, which poses a greater risk of developing genitourinary malignancies. There are multiple studies published that have investigated this specific patient population, most derived from large cohorts of patients with spinal cord injury. Summary Although there is more evidence on screening for bladder cancer, specific screening protocols for different underlying conditions and urinary diversion are lacking. Few studies have looked prospectively into the management of bladder cancer in this subset of patients, and good quality evidence for tailoring the care of this population is lacking. Nonetheless, surgical complications are expected to be greater in this scenario.
ISSN:1931-7212
1931-7220
DOI:10.1007/s11884-024-00747-5