Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?

The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Planta 1997, Vol.202 (4), p.522-530
Hauptverfasser: Fricke, W, McDonald, A.J.S, Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 4
container_start_page 522
container_title Planta
container_volume 202
creator Fricke, W
McDonald, A.J.S
Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)
description The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall properties. Plants were grown on full-strength Hoagland solution ("Hoagland"-plants), or on N-deficient Hoagland solution while receiving N at a relative addition rate of 16 or 8% N · plant-N-1 · d-1 ("16%-" and "8%-plants"). Hoagland-plants were demand-limited, whereas 16%- and 8%-plants were supply-limited in N. Third leaves were analysed for leaf elongation rate and final epidermal cell length, and, within the basal growing region, for the spatial distribution of relative segmental elongation rates (RSER, pin-pricking method), epidermal cell turgor (cell-pressure probe), osmotic pressure (OP, picolitre osmometry) and water potential (Ψ). During the development of the third leaf, plants grew at relative growth rates (relative increase in fresh weight) of 18.2, 15.6 and 8.1% · d-1 (Hoagland-, 16%- and 8%-plants, respectively). Final leaf length and leaf elongation rate were highest in Hoagland plants (ca. 34.1 cm and 2.33—2.60 mm · h-1, respectively), intermediate in 16%-plants (31.0 cm and 1.89—1.96 mm · h-1) and lowest in 8%-plants (29.4 cm and 1.41—1.58 mm · h-1). These differences were accompanied by only small differences in final cell length, but large differences in cell-flux rates (146, 187 and 201 cells · cell-file-1 · d-1 in 8%-, 16%- and Hoagland-plants, respectively). The length of the growth zone (32—38 mm) was not much affected by N-levels (and nutrient technique). A decrease in RSER in the growth zone distal to 10 mm produced the significant effect of N-levels on leaf elongation rate. In all treatments, cell turgor was almost constant throughout the growing region, as were cell OP and Ψ in 16%- and 8%-plants. In Hoagland-plants, however, cell OP increased by ca. 0.1 MPa within the zone of highest elongation rates and, as a consequence, cell Ψ decreased simultaneously by 0.1 MPa. Cell Ψ increased considerably where elongation ceased. Within the zone where differences in RSERs were highest between treatments (10—34 mm from base) average turgor was lowest, OP highest and Ψ most negative in Hoagland- compared to 8%- and 16%-plants (P < 0.001), but not significantly different between 8%- and 16%-plants.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s004250050157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s004250050157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23385088</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23385088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c5e7827e63bd9f79b1fca1f9cfc42ab316f2138447d4d2f895a1432f3cd867843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtHL4KQg9fVydcmOYlorWLRi-Jxyeajbkm7JVmF_vemVBRP84bfmwfzEDolcEkA5FUG4FQACCBC7qER4YxWFLjaRyOAokEzcYiOcl4AFCjlCD29f2yw63H05stnbFZuKwO2PsaM-4Cfq9gtu8E73JoU_Qb72K_mZvDYDDh592kLSmXP18foIJiY_cnPHKO3-8nr7UM1e5k-3t7MKstADJUVXioqfc1ap4PULQnWkKBtsJyalpE6UMIU59JxR4PSwmw_Ccw6VUvF2RhVu1yb-pyTD806dUuTNg2BZttE86-J4r_Y-dcmWxNDMivb5d8jKmvNJCm2851tkYc-_WHGlAClCj_b8WD6xsxTibibaDWltebsG8kxbe4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Fricke, W ; McDonald, A.J.S ; Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</creator><creatorcontrib>Fricke, W ; McDonald, A.J.S ; Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall properties. Plants were grown on full-strength Hoagland solution ("Hoagland"-plants), or on N-deficient Hoagland solution while receiving N at a relative addition rate of 16 or 8% N · plant-N-1 · d-1 ("16%-" and "8%-plants"). Hoagland-plants were demand-limited, whereas 16%- and 8%-plants were supply-limited in N. Third leaves were analysed for leaf elongation rate and final epidermal cell length, and, within the basal growing region, for the spatial distribution of relative segmental elongation rates (RSER, pin-pricking method), epidermal cell turgor (cell-pressure probe), osmotic pressure (OP, picolitre osmometry) and water potential (Ψ). During the development of the third leaf, plants grew at relative growth rates (relative increase in fresh weight) of 18.2, 15.6 and 8.1% · d-1 (Hoagland-, 16%- and 8%-plants, respectively). Final leaf length and leaf elongation rate were highest in Hoagland plants (ca. 34.1 cm and 2.33—2.60 mm · h-1, respectively), intermediate in 16%-plants (31.0 cm and 1.89—1.96 mm · h-1) and lowest in 8%-plants (29.4 cm and 1.41—1.58 mm · h-1). These differences were accompanied by only small differences in final cell length, but large differences in cell-flux rates (146, 187 and 201 cells · cell-file-1 · d-1 in 8%-, 16%- and Hoagland-plants, respectively). The length of the growth zone (32—38 mm) was not much affected by N-levels (and nutrient technique). A decrease in RSER in the growth zone distal to 10 mm produced the significant effect of N-levels on leaf elongation rate. In all treatments, cell turgor was almost constant throughout the growing region, as were cell OP and Ψ in 16%- and 8%-plants. In Hoagland-plants, however, cell OP increased by ca. 0.1 MPa within the zone of highest elongation rates and, as a consequence, cell Ψ decreased simultaneously by 0.1 MPa. Cell Ψ increased considerably where elongation ceased. Within the zone where differences in RSERs were highest between treatments (10—34 mm from base) average turgor was lowest, OP highest and Ψ most negative in Hoagland- compared to 8%- and 16%-plants (P &lt; 0.001), but not significantly different between 8%- and 16%-plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004250050157</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLANAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; AGUA ; AZOTE ; Barley ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cell growth ; CELL WALLS ; CELLS ; CELLULE ; CELULAS ; Chemical agents ; CRECIMIENTO ; CROISSANCE ; EAU ; Economic plant physiology ; Epidermal cells ; EPIDERME ; EPIDERMIS ; FEUILLE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GROWTH ; Growth and development ; HOJAS ; HORDEUM VULGARE ; LEAVES ; Mangelernaehrung ; Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence ; NITROGEN ; NITROGENO ; NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS ; Osmosis ; OSMOTIC PRESSURE ; PARED CELULAR ; PAROI CELLULAIRE ; Plant growth ; Plant physiology and development ; Plants ; PRESION OSMOTICA ; PRESSION OSMOTIQUE ; SOLUCIONES NUTRITIVAS ; SOLUTION NUTRITIVE ; Spatial distribution ; TURGENCIA ; TURGESCENCE ; TURGOR ; Turgor pressure ; Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence ; WATER</subject><ispartof>Planta, 1997, Vol.202 (4), p.522-530</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c5e7827e63bd9f79b1fca1f9cfc42ab316f2138447d4d2f895a1432f3cd867843</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23385088$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23385088$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,4012,27910,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2769371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fricke, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, A.J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</creatorcontrib><title>Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?</title><title>Planta</title><description>The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall properties. Plants were grown on full-strength Hoagland solution ("Hoagland"-plants), or on N-deficient Hoagland solution while receiving N at a relative addition rate of 16 or 8% N · plant-N-1 · d-1 ("16%-" and "8%-plants"). Hoagland-plants were demand-limited, whereas 16%- and 8%-plants were supply-limited in N. Third leaves were analysed for leaf elongation rate and final epidermal cell length, and, within the basal growing region, for the spatial distribution of relative segmental elongation rates (RSER, pin-pricking method), epidermal cell turgor (cell-pressure probe), osmotic pressure (OP, picolitre osmometry) and water potential (Ψ). During the development of the third leaf, plants grew at relative growth rates (relative increase in fresh weight) of 18.2, 15.6 and 8.1% · d-1 (Hoagland-, 16%- and 8%-plants, respectively). Final leaf length and leaf elongation rate were highest in Hoagland plants (ca. 34.1 cm and 2.33—2.60 mm · h-1, respectively), intermediate in 16%-plants (31.0 cm and 1.89—1.96 mm · h-1) and lowest in 8%-plants (29.4 cm and 1.41—1.58 mm · h-1). These differences were accompanied by only small differences in final cell length, but large differences in cell-flux rates (146, 187 and 201 cells · cell-file-1 · d-1 in 8%-, 16%- and Hoagland-plants, respectively). The length of the growth zone (32—38 mm) was not much affected by N-levels (and nutrient technique). A decrease in RSER in the growth zone distal to 10 mm produced the significant effect of N-levels on leaf elongation rate. In all treatments, cell turgor was almost constant throughout the growing region, as were cell OP and Ψ in 16%- and 8%-plants. In Hoagland-plants, however, cell OP increased by ca. 0.1 MPa within the zone of highest elongation rates and, as a consequence, cell Ψ decreased simultaneously by 0.1 MPa. Cell Ψ increased considerably where elongation ceased. Within the zone where differences in RSERs were highest between treatments (10—34 mm from base) average turgor was lowest, OP highest and Ψ most negative in Hoagland- compared to 8%- and 16%-plants (P &lt; 0.001), but not significantly different between 8%- and 16%-plants.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>AGUA</subject><subject>AZOTE</subject><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>CELL WALLS</subject><subject>CELLS</subject><subject>CELLULE</subject><subject>CELULAS</subject><subject>Chemical agents</subject><subject>CRECIMIENTO</subject><subject>CROISSANCE</subject><subject>EAU</subject><subject>Economic plant physiology</subject><subject>Epidermal cells</subject><subject>EPIDERME</subject><subject>EPIDERMIS</subject><subject>FEUILLE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GROWTH</subject><subject>Growth and development</subject><subject>HOJAS</subject><subject>HORDEUM VULGARE</subject><subject>LEAVES</subject><subject>Mangelernaehrung</subject><subject>Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence</subject><subject>NITROGEN</subject><subject>NITROGENO</subject><subject>NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS</subject><subject>Osmosis</subject><subject>OSMOTIC PRESSURE</subject><subject>PARED CELULAR</subject><subject>PAROI CELLULAIRE</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant physiology and development</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>PRESION OSMOTICA</subject><subject>PRESSION OSMOTIQUE</subject><subject>SOLUCIONES NUTRITIVAS</subject><subject>SOLUTION NUTRITIVE</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>TURGENCIA</subject><subject>TURGESCENCE</subject><subject>TURGOR</subject><subject>Turgor pressure</subject><subject>Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence</subject><subject>WATER</subject><issn>0032-0935</issn><issn>1432-2048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtHL4KQg9fVydcmOYlorWLRi-Jxyeajbkm7JVmF_vemVBRP84bfmwfzEDolcEkA5FUG4FQACCBC7qER4YxWFLjaRyOAokEzcYiOcl4AFCjlCD29f2yw63H05stnbFZuKwO2PsaM-4Cfq9gtu8E73JoU_Qb72K_mZvDYDDh592kLSmXP18foIJiY_cnPHKO3-8nr7UM1e5k-3t7MKstADJUVXioqfc1ap4PULQnWkKBtsJyalpE6UMIU59JxR4PSwmw_Ccw6VUvF2RhVu1yb-pyTD806dUuTNg2BZttE86-J4r_Y-dcmWxNDMivb5d8jKmvNJCm2851tkYc-_WHGlAClCj_b8WD6xsxTibibaDWltebsG8kxbe4</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Fricke, W</creator><creator>McDonald, A.J.S</creator><creator>Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?</title><author>Fricke, W ; McDonald, A.J.S ; Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-c5e7827e63bd9f79b1fca1f9cfc42ab316f2138447d4d2f895a1432f3cd867843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>AGUA</topic><topic>AZOTE</topic><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>CELL WALLS</topic><topic>CELLS</topic><topic>CELLULE</topic><topic>CELULAS</topic><topic>Chemical agents</topic><topic>CRECIMIENTO</topic><topic>CROISSANCE</topic><topic>EAU</topic><topic>Economic plant physiology</topic><topic>Epidermal cells</topic><topic>EPIDERME</topic><topic>EPIDERMIS</topic><topic>FEUILLE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GROWTH</topic><topic>Growth and development</topic><topic>HOJAS</topic><topic>HORDEUM VULGARE</topic><topic>LEAVES</topic><topic>Mangelernaehrung</topic><topic>Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence</topic><topic>NITROGEN</topic><topic>NITROGENO</topic><topic>NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS</topic><topic>Osmosis</topic><topic>OSMOTIC PRESSURE</topic><topic>PARED CELULAR</topic><topic>PAROI CELLULAIRE</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant physiology and development</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>PRESION OSMOTICA</topic><topic>PRESSION OSMOTIQUE</topic><topic>SOLUCIONES NUTRITIVAS</topic><topic>SOLUTION NUTRITIVE</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>TURGENCIA</topic><topic>TURGESCENCE</topic><topic>TURGOR</topic><topic>Turgor pressure</topic><topic>Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence</topic><topic>WATER</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fricke, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, A.J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Planta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fricke, W</au><au>McDonald, A.J.S</au><au>Mattson-Djos, L. (Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala (Sweden). Dept. for Production Ecology)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?</atitle><jtitle>Planta</jtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>202</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>522</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>522-530</pages><issn>0032-0935</issn><eissn>1432-2048</eissn><coden>PLANAB</coden><abstract>The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall properties. Plants were grown on full-strength Hoagland solution ("Hoagland"-plants), or on N-deficient Hoagland solution while receiving N at a relative addition rate of 16 or 8% N · plant-N-1 · d-1 ("16%-" and "8%-plants"). Hoagland-plants were demand-limited, whereas 16%- and 8%-plants were supply-limited in N. Third leaves were analysed for leaf elongation rate and final epidermal cell length, and, within the basal growing region, for the spatial distribution of relative segmental elongation rates (RSER, pin-pricking method), epidermal cell turgor (cell-pressure probe), osmotic pressure (OP, picolitre osmometry) and water potential (Ψ). During the development of the third leaf, plants grew at relative growth rates (relative increase in fresh weight) of 18.2, 15.6 and 8.1% · d-1 (Hoagland-, 16%- and 8%-plants, respectively). Final leaf length and leaf elongation rate were highest in Hoagland plants (ca. 34.1 cm and 2.33—2.60 mm · h-1, respectively), intermediate in 16%-plants (31.0 cm and 1.89—1.96 mm · h-1) and lowest in 8%-plants (29.4 cm and 1.41—1.58 mm · h-1). These differences were accompanied by only small differences in final cell length, but large differences in cell-flux rates (146, 187 and 201 cells · cell-file-1 · d-1 in 8%-, 16%- and Hoagland-plants, respectively). The length of the growth zone (32—38 mm) was not much affected by N-levels (and nutrient technique). A decrease in RSER in the growth zone distal to 10 mm produced the significant effect of N-levels on leaf elongation rate. In all treatments, cell turgor was almost constant throughout the growing region, as were cell OP and Ψ in 16%- and 8%-plants. In Hoagland-plants, however, cell OP increased by ca. 0.1 MPa within the zone of highest elongation rates and, as a consequence, cell Ψ decreased simultaneously by 0.1 MPa. Cell Ψ increased considerably where elongation ceased. Within the zone where differences in RSERs were highest between treatments (10—34 mm from base) average turgor was lowest, OP highest and Ψ most negative in Hoagland- compared to 8%- and 16%-plants (P &lt; 0.001), but not significantly different between 8%- and 16%-plants.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s004250050157</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0935
ispartof Planta, 1997, Vol.202 (4), p.522-530
issn 0032-0935
1432-2048
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s004250050157
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
AGUA
AZOTE
Barley
Biological and medical sciences
Cell growth
CELL WALLS
CELLS
CELLULE
CELULAS
Chemical agents
CRECIMIENTO
CROISSANCE
EAU
Economic plant physiology
Epidermal cells
EPIDERME
EPIDERMIS
FEUILLE
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GROWTH
Growth and development
HOJAS
HORDEUM VULGARE
LEAVES
Mangelernaehrung
Morphogenesis, differentiation, rhizogenesis, tuberization. Senescence
NITROGEN
NITROGENO
NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS
Osmosis
OSMOTIC PRESSURE
PARED CELULAR
PAROI CELLULAIRE
Plant growth
Plant physiology and development
Plants
PRESION OSMOTICA
PRESSION OSMOTIQUE
SOLUCIONES NUTRITIVAS
SOLUTION NUTRITIVE
Spatial distribution
TURGENCIA
TURGESCENCE
TURGOR
Turgor pressure
Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence
WATER
title Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20leaves%20and%20leaf%20cells%20of%20N-limited%20barley%20elongate%20at%20reduced%20rates?&rft.jtitle=Planta&rft.au=Fricke,%20W&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=202&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=522&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=522-530&rft.issn=0032-0935&rft.eissn=1432-2048&rft.coden=PLANAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004250050157&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23385088%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23385088&rfr_iscdi=true