Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?
We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2001-01, Vol.11 (11), p.2262-2266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2262 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Wormanns, D Diederich, S Lenzen, H Lange, P Link, T M Ludwig, K Papke, K Hagedorn, C Heindel, W |
description | We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s003300100989 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s003300100989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11702170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-da55b7c0def6993ce326c7d8ce9d6a93e739aa8ae67703a5ad248f3c97a770943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEFLAzEQhYMotlaPXiV_YHWy2W4yXqQsVoWCl3pepsksjbS7a9Ki_ntXWhAPwxseH-_wCXGt4FYBmLsEoDXA8KPFEzFWhc4zBbY4FWNAbTODWIzERUrvMDCqMOdipJSBfLixmM9WvtuGljYy9SEOUS1laKVbh42P3N7Lz3VwaxnJB9qFrpX81XdpH1mGJCN_7ENk_3ApzhraJL465kS8zR-X1XO2eH16qWaLzOUWd5mn6XRlHHhuSkTtWOelM946Rl8SajYaiSxxaQxompLPC9toh4aGAgs9Edlh18UupchN3cewpfhdK6h_fdT_fAz8zYHv96st-z_6KED_AIBgWq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Wormanns, D ; Diederich, S ; Lenzen, H ; Lange, P ; Link, T M ; Ludwig, K ; Papke, K ; Hagedorn, C ; Heindel, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Wormanns, D ; Diederich, S ; Lenzen, H ; Lange, P ; Link, T M ; Ludwig, K ; Papke, K ; Hagedorn, C ; Heindel, W</creatorcontrib><description>We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s003300100989</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11702170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Radiation Dosage ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2001-01, Vol.11 (11), p.2262-2266</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-da55b7c0def6993ce326c7d8ce9d6a93e739aa8ae67703a5ad248f3c97a770943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11702170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wormanns, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diederich, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenzen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papke, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindel, W</creatorcontrib><title>Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEFLAzEQhYMotlaPXiV_YHWy2W4yXqQsVoWCl3pepsksjbS7a9Ki_ntXWhAPwxseH-_wCXGt4FYBmLsEoDXA8KPFEzFWhc4zBbY4FWNAbTODWIzERUrvMDCqMOdipJSBfLixmM9WvtuGljYy9SEOUS1laKVbh42P3N7Lz3VwaxnJB9qFrpX81XdpH1mGJCN_7ENk_3ApzhraJL465kS8zR-X1XO2eH16qWaLzOUWd5mn6XRlHHhuSkTtWOelM946Rl8SajYaiSxxaQxompLPC9toh4aGAgs9Edlh18UupchN3cewpfhdK6h_fdT_fAz8zYHv96st-z_6KED_AIBgWq0</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Wormanns, D</creator><creator>Diederich, S</creator><creator>Lenzen, H</creator><creator>Lange, P</creator><creator>Link, T M</creator><creator>Ludwig, K</creator><creator>Papke, K</creator><creator>Hagedorn, C</creator><creator>Heindel, W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?</title><author>Wormanns, D ; Diederich, S ; Lenzen, H ; Lange, P ; Link, T M ; Ludwig, K ; Papke, K ; Hagedorn, C ; Heindel, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-da55b7c0def6993ce326c7d8ce9d6a93e739aa8ae67703a5ad248f3c97a770943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wormanns, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diederich, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenzen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lange, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papke, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagedorn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heindel, W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wormanns, D</au><au>Diederich, S</au><au>Lenzen, H</au><au>Lange, P</au><au>Link, T M</au><au>Ludwig, K</au><au>Papke, K</au><au>Hagedorn, C</au><au>Heindel, W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required?</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2262</spage><epage>2266</epage><pages>2262-2266</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>We decided to test to what extent dose reduction is possible in abdominal spiral computed tomography (CT) in young children without loss of anatomic diagnostic information. A retrospective study was performed of 30 abdominal CT examinations of children aged 3 months to 7 years. These were divided into two groups: group A with reduced radiation exposure (tube current 50 mA, CT dose index CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) and group B with standard radiation exposure (tube current > or =100 mA, CTDIFDA > or =1.66 mGy). Image quality was assessed using a four-part scale ('excellent', 'good', 'sufficient', 'poor') on visual image impression and visibility of 32 anatomical details. Five experienced radiologists read the CT scans independently who were blinded to the examination parameters. Differences in ranked data were evaluated with Wilcoxon's rank sum test. No difference between groups A and B was observed in visual image impression. Detail visibility was significantly lower in group A, but the differences were limited to right upper quadrant structures (portal vein, common bile duct, pancreatic head, adrenals) and to arterial branches. Significant differences in visibility rated as 'poor' were only found for the hepatic, splenic and renal arteries; all other structures showed no difference between groups A and B. A protocol with reduced radiation exposure (50 mA, CTDIFDA < or =0.83 mGy) allowed the demonstration of most anatomic structures in abdominal spiral CT in young children. For the precise demonstration of small details (e.g. structures of the right upper quadrant), a protocol with standard radiation exposure (> or =100 mAs) was superior.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>11702170</pmid><doi>10.1007/s003300100989</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2001-01, Vol.11 (11), p.2262-2266 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s003300100989 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Child Child, Preschool Humans Infant Male Radiation Dosage Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T07%3A45%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Abdominal%20spiral%20CT%20in%20children:%20which%20radiation%20exposure%20is%20required?&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Wormanns,%20D&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2262&rft.epage=2266&rft.pages=2262-2266&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s003300100989&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E11702170%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/11702170&rfr_iscdi=true |