Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours

To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of unencapsulated doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDDP) and their pegylated liposome encapsulated counterparts (PLED and PLEC) in a subcutaneous model of human squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. In vitro cytotoxicity was determined by means of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2000, Vol.46 (1), p.10-18
Hauptverfasser: HARRINGTON, K. J, ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G, USTER, P. S, STEWART, J. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 10
container_title Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
container_volume 46
creator HARRINGTON, K. J
ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G
USTER, P. S
STEWART, J. S
description To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of unencapsulated doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDDP) and their pegylated liposome encapsulated counterparts (PLED and PLEC) in a subcutaneous model of human squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. In vitro cytotoxicity was determined by means of the sulphorhodamine B assay and in vivo activity was assessed in terms of tumour growth delay following single intravenous doses of the various agents. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated by means of serial weight measurement. The IC(50) values for DOX (12.1-fold) and CDDP (21.5-fold) were lower than for their liposome-encapsulated counterparts. When the two unencapsulated agents were compared, the IC(50) value for DOX was 16-fold lower than that for CDDP. In the in vivo studies, liposomes containing DTPA (PLEDTPA) exerted no effect on KB xenograft tumours when compared to untreated controls (P > 0.1). PLED was significantly more effective than DOX at doses of 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). At the 8 mg/kg dose, 7/13 animals treated with PLED were free of disease at 60 days, compared to 0/12 treated with DOX. PLEC displayed superior activity in comparison to CDDP at the 4 mg/kg dose level (P < 0.001), although at doses of 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg this comparison only reached borderline statistical significance (0.1 > P > 0.05). The highest dose level of 20 mg/kg was fatal to all animals in the CDDP group but well-tolerated by the animals in the PLEC group. On the basis of serial weight measurements, both PLED and PLEC were shown to be tolerated better than DOX and CDDP. Both PLED and PLEC were shown to exert significant activity against head and neck xenograft tumours, with PLED showing particular efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s002800000128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s002800000128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10912572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-1a5f7176bd8f3dc4925c6029d4334a7d15ba889880bc44b885fa340840e9e4383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQQIMo7rp69Co5eK0mTbpJj7L4BQt60HNJk8lutW1KksL6783aBXUYGGbmMTAPoUtKbigh4jYQkkuyD5rLIzSnnOUZkZwdozlhnGeFIHyGzkL4SAynjJ2iGSUlzQuRz1H3CpuvVkUwuG0GF1wHGfRaDWGcpsbtnB_rRjc9Vr3BuglD2qQuZdwCjh5U7KCP2Fm8BWV-sB70J95B7zZe2Yjj2LnRh3N0YlUb4OJQF-j94f5t9ZStXx6fV3frTDMqY0ZVYQUVy9pIy4zmZV7oJclLwxnjShha1ErKUkpSa85rKQurGE9PEyiBM8kWKJvuau9C8GCrwTed8l8VJdVeW_VPW-KvJn4Y6w7MH3rylIDrA6CCVq31qk8ifjlOpSgE-waLNXWY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>HARRINGTON, K. J ; ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G ; USTER, P. S ; STEWART, J. S</creator><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, K. J ; ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G ; USTER, P. S ; STEWART, J. S</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of unencapsulated doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDDP) and their pegylated liposome encapsulated counterparts (PLED and PLEC) in a subcutaneous model of human squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. In vitro cytotoxicity was determined by means of the sulphorhodamine B assay and in vivo activity was assessed in terms of tumour growth delay following single intravenous doses of the various agents. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated by means of serial weight measurement. The IC(50) values for DOX (12.1-fold) and CDDP (21.5-fold) were lower than for their liposome-encapsulated counterparts. When the two unencapsulated agents were compared, the IC(50) value for DOX was 16-fold lower than that for CDDP. In the in vivo studies, liposomes containing DTPA (PLEDTPA) exerted no effect on KB xenograft tumours when compared to untreated controls (P &gt; 0.1). PLED was significantly more effective than DOX at doses of 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). At the 8 mg/kg dose, 7/13 animals treated with PLED were free of disease at 60 days, compared to 0/12 treated with DOX. PLEC displayed superior activity in comparison to CDDP at the 4 mg/kg dose level (P &lt; 0.001), although at doses of 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg this comparison only reached borderline statistical significance (0.1 &gt; P &gt; 0.05). The highest dose level of 20 mg/kg was fatal to all animals in the CDDP group but well-tolerated by the animals in the PLEC group. On the basis of serial weight measurements, both PLED and PLEC were shown to be tolerated better than DOX and CDDP. Both PLED and PLEC were shown to exert significant activity against head and neck xenograft tumours, with PLED showing particular efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002800000128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10912572</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCPHDZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antineoplastic agents ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy ; Cell Survival - drug effects ; Chemotherapy ; Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage ; Doxorubicin - therapeutic use ; Drug Delivery Systems ; Female ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Humans ; Liposomes ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Nude ; Neoplasm Transplantation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Polyethylene Glycols ; Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><ispartof>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2000, Vol.46 (1), p.10-18</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-1a5f7176bd8f3dc4925c6029d4334a7d15ba889880bc44b885fa340840e9e4383</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1418757$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10912572$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USTER, P. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, J. S</creatorcontrib><title>Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours</title><title>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of unencapsulated doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDDP) and their pegylated liposome encapsulated counterparts (PLED and PLEC) in a subcutaneous model of human squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. In vitro cytotoxicity was determined by means of the sulphorhodamine B assay and in vivo activity was assessed in terms of tumour growth delay following single intravenous doses of the various agents. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated by means of serial weight measurement. The IC(50) values for DOX (12.1-fold) and CDDP (21.5-fold) were lower than for their liposome-encapsulated counterparts. When the two unencapsulated agents were compared, the IC(50) value for DOX was 16-fold lower than that for CDDP. In the in vivo studies, liposomes containing DTPA (PLEDTPA) exerted no effect on KB xenograft tumours when compared to untreated controls (P &gt; 0.1). PLED was significantly more effective than DOX at doses of 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). At the 8 mg/kg dose, 7/13 animals treated with PLED were free of disease at 60 days, compared to 0/12 treated with DOX. PLEC displayed superior activity in comparison to CDDP at the 4 mg/kg dose level (P &lt; 0.001), although at doses of 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg this comparison only reached borderline statistical significance (0.1 &gt; P &gt; 0.05). The highest dose level of 20 mg/kg was fatal to all animals in the CDDP group but well-tolerated by the animals in the PLEC group. On the basis of serial weight measurements, both PLED and PLEC were shown to be tolerated better than DOX and CDDP. Both PLED and PLEC were shown to exert significant activity against head and neck xenograft tumours, with PLED showing particular efficacy.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cell Survival - drug effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liposomes</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Neoplasm Transplantation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols</subject><subject>Transplantation, Heterologous</subject><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQQIMo7rp69Co5eK0mTbpJj7L4BQt60HNJk8lutW1KksL6783aBXUYGGbmMTAPoUtKbigh4jYQkkuyD5rLIzSnnOUZkZwdozlhnGeFIHyGzkL4SAynjJ2iGSUlzQuRz1H3CpuvVkUwuG0GF1wHGfRaDWGcpsbtnB_rRjc9Vr3BuglD2qQuZdwCjh5U7KCP2Fm8BWV-sB70J95B7zZe2Yjj2LnRh3N0YlUb4OJQF-j94f5t9ZStXx6fV3frTDMqY0ZVYQUVy9pIy4zmZV7oJclLwxnjShha1ErKUkpSa85rKQurGE9PEyiBM8kWKJvuau9C8GCrwTed8l8VJdVeW_VPW-KvJn4Y6w7MH3rylIDrA6CCVq31qk8ifjlOpSgE-waLNXWY</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>HARRINGTON, K. J</creator><creator>ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G</creator><creator>USTER, P. S</creator><creator>STEWART, J. S</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours</title><author>HARRINGTON, K. J ; ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G ; USTER, P. S ; STEWART, J. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-1a5f7176bd8f3dc4925c6029d4334a7d15ba889880bc44b885fa340840e9e4383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cell Survival - drug effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Cisplatin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liposomes</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Neoplasm Transplantation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols</topic><topic>Transplantation, Heterologous</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USTER, P. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STEWART, J. S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HARRINGTON, K. J</au><au>ROWLINSON-BUSZA, G</au><au>USTER, P. S</au><au>STEWART, J. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours</atitle><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>10-18</pages><issn>0344-5704</issn><eissn>1432-0843</eissn><coden>CCPHDZ</coden><abstract>To evaluate the in vitro and in vivo activity of unencapsulated doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (CDDP) and their pegylated liposome encapsulated counterparts (PLED and PLEC) in a subcutaneous model of human squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. In vitro cytotoxicity was determined by means of the sulphorhodamine B assay and in vivo activity was assessed in terms of tumour growth delay following single intravenous doses of the various agents. Treatment-related toxicity was evaluated by means of serial weight measurement. The IC(50) values for DOX (12.1-fold) and CDDP (21.5-fold) were lower than for their liposome-encapsulated counterparts. When the two unencapsulated agents were compared, the IC(50) value for DOX was 16-fold lower than that for CDDP. In the in vivo studies, liposomes containing DTPA (PLEDTPA) exerted no effect on KB xenograft tumours when compared to untreated controls (P &gt; 0.1). PLED was significantly more effective than DOX at doses of 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg (P &lt; 0.001 for all comparisons). At the 8 mg/kg dose, 7/13 animals treated with PLED were free of disease at 60 days, compared to 0/12 treated with DOX. PLEC displayed superior activity in comparison to CDDP at the 4 mg/kg dose level (P &lt; 0.001), although at doses of 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg this comparison only reached borderline statistical significance (0.1 &gt; P &gt; 0.05). The highest dose level of 20 mg/kg was fatal to all animals in the CDDP group but well-tolerated by the animals in the PLEC group. On the basis of serial weight measurements, both PLED and PLEC were shown to be tolerated better than DOX and CDDP. Both PLED and PLEC were shown to exert significant activity against head and neck xenograft tumours, with PLED showing particular efficacy.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>10912572</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002800000128</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0344-5704
ispartof Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2000, Vol.46 (1), p.10-18
issn 0344-5704
1432-0843
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_s002800000128
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animals
Antineoplastic agents
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - drug therapy
Cell Survival - drug effects
Chemotherapy
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Doxorubicin - administration & dosage
Doxorubicin - therapeutic use
Drug Delivery Systems
Female
Head and Neck Neoplasms - drug therapy
Humans
Liposomes
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Nude
Neoplasm Transplantation
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Polyethylene Glycols
Transplantation, Heterologous
title Pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and cisplatin in the treatment of head and neck xenograft tumours
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A01%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pegylated%20liposome-encapsulated%20doxorubicin%20and%20cisplatin%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20head%20and%20neck%20xenograft%20tumours&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20chemotherapy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=HARRINGTON,%20K.%20J&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=10-18&rft.issn=0344-5704&rft.eissn=1432-0843&rft.coden=CCPHDZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002800000128&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E10912572%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/10912572&rfr_iscdi=true