Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine

This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had bee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of anaesthesia 1995, Vol.42 (1), p.41-45
Hauptverfasser: HOWELL, P. R, GAMBLING, D. R, PAVY, T, MCMORLAND, G, DOUGLAS, M. J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Canadian journal of anaesthesia
container_volume 42
creator HOWELL, P. R
GAMBLING, D. R
PAVY, T
MCMORLAND, G
DOUGLAS, M. J
description This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF03010570
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03010570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>7889583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-d7dfb4a469da55220f57fb791b87cd94dfafe11395ce86cdacdc81d7b07921ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc04v3oUcPAnVpGmbxJsOp8JADwreymt-bJE2LUnHGP7zdm7M04P3_Xzfgw9Cl5TcUkL43eOMMEJJzskRGtNMFomQPD9GYyJYmhSUfJ2isxi_CSGiyMUIjbgQMhdsjH7eoXfG94lqfR_aujYag4d6YaIDbIdFu3Z-gRWYCMGAx9Go3rUer7w2AS-MNwHqbcfEfvnXuseAVdt0EFwcwNZiO3wAv6nx2vVL3LShWzpvztGJhTqai_2coM_Z08f0JZm_Pb9OH-aJYhnvE821rTLICqkhz9OU2JzbiktaCa60zLQFayhlMldGFEqD0kpQzSvCZUorYBN0s7urQhtjMLbsgmsgbEpKyq3A8l_gAF_t4G5VNUYf0L2xIb_e5xAV1DaAVy4eMMYKKknBfgGUwntW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>HOWELL, P. R ; GAMBLING, D. R ; PAVY, T ; MCMORLAND, G ; DOUGLAS, M. J</creator><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, P. R ; GAMBLING, D. R ; PAVY, T ; MCMORLAND, G ; DOUGLAS, M. J</creatorcontrib><description>This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0832-610X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-8975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03010570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7889583</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJOAEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto, ON: Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia, General ; Anesthesia, Obstetrical ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cesarean Section ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage ; Fentanyl - adverse effects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Morphine - adverse effects ; Nausea - chemically induced ; Neuropharmacology ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Pruritus - chemically induced ; Sleep Stages - drug effects ; Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Vol.42 (1), p.41-45</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-d7dfb4a469da55220f57fb791b87cd94dfafe11395ce86cdacdc81d7b07921ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-d7dfb4a469da55220f57fb791b87cd94dfafe11395ce86cdacdc81d7b07921ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,4036,4037,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3361906$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7889583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAMBLING, D. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAVY, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMORLAND, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, M. J</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine</title><title>Canadian journal of anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><description>This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fentanyl - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Morphine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nausea - chemically induced</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pruritus - chemically induced</subject><subject>Sleep Stages - drug effects</subject><subject>Vomiting - chemically induced</subject><issn>0832-610X</issn><issn>1496-8975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM9LwzAUx4Moc04v3oUcPAnVpGmbxJsOp8JADwreymt-bJE2LUnHGP7zdm7M04P3_Xzfgw9Cl5TcUkL43eOMMEJJzskRGtNMFomQPD9GYyJYmhSUfJ2isxi_CSGiyMUIjbgQMhdsjH7eoXfG94lqfR_aujYag4d6YaIDbIdFu3Z-gRWYCMGAx9Go3rUer7w2AS-MNwHqbcfEfvnXuseAVdt0EFwcwNZiO3wAv6nx2vVL3LShWzpvztGJhTqai_2coM_Z08f0JZm_Pb9OH-aJYhnvE821rTLICqkhz9OU2JzbiktaCa60zLQFayhlMldGFEqD0kpQzSvCZUorYBN0s7urQhtjMLbsgmsgbEpKyq3A8l_gAF_t4G5VNUYf0L2xIb_e5xAV1DaAVy4eMMYKKknBfgGUwntW</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>HOWELL, P. R</creator><creator>GAMBLING, D. R</creator><creator>PAVY, T</creator><creator>MCMORLAND, G</creator><creator>DOUGLAS, M. J</creator><general>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine</title><author>HOWELL, P. R ; GAMBLING, D. R ; PAVY, T ; MCMORLAND, G ; DOUGLAS, M. J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-d7dfb4a469da55220f57fb791b87cd94dfafe11395ce86cdacdc81d7b07921ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fentanyl - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Morphine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nausea - chemically induced</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pruritus - chemically induced</topic><topic>Sleep Stages - drug effects</topic><topic>Vomiting - chemically induced</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOWELL, P. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GAMBLING, D. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PAVY, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCMORLAND, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, M. J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOWELL, P. R</au><au>GAMBLING, D. R</au><au>PAVY, T</au><au>MCMORLAND, G</au><au>DOUGLAS, M. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Anaesth</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>41-45</pages><issn>0832-610X</issn><eissn>1496-8975</eissn><coden>CJOAEP</coden><abstract>This prospective, randomised, double-blind study compared PCA fentanyl with PCA morphine for post-Caesarean section analgesia. Following a standardised general anaesthetic, 37 women were allocated to receive either fentanyl (n = 18) or morphine (n = 19). The PCA was commenced after the women had been made comfortable in the postanaesthetic recovery room with the appropriate opioid solution (mean dose required = fentanyl 375 micrograms or morphine 16 mg). Initial PCA settings were bolus 1 ml (fentanyl 25 micrograms or morphine 1 mg), lockout time ten minutes, and no background infusion. Both analgesic solutions provided effective analgesia for a mean of 37 hr with high levels of patient satisfaction, and there were no differences in VAS scores for pain and patient satisfaction, or for side effects (nausea, itch, and sleepiness) between fentanyl or morphine. However, more patients in the fentanyl group required supplementary boluses or alterations to the PCA settings (13/18 vs 4/19: P = 0.005), and one patient was removed from the study due to inadequate analgesia. We conclude that fentanyl is not recommended for routine PCA use following Caesarean section.</abstract><cop>Toronto, ON</cop><pub>Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society</pub><pmid>7889583</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF03010570</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0832-610X
ispartof Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 1995, Vol.42 (1), p.41-45
issn 0832-610X
1496-8975
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF03010570
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods
Analgesics
Anesthesia, General
Anesthesia, Obstetrical
Biological and medical sciences
Cesarean Section
Double-Blind Method
Female
Fentanyl - administration & dosage
Fentanyl - adverse effects
Humans
Medical sciences
Morphine - administration & dosage
Morphine - adverse effects
Nausea - chemically induced
Neuropharmacology
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Patient Satisfaction
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Pruritus - chemically induced
Sleep Stages - drug effects
Vomiting - chemically induced
title Patient-controlled analgesia following caesarean section under general anaesthesia : a comparison of fentanyl with morphine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A37%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-controlled%20analgesia%20following%20caesarean%20section%20under%20general%20anaesthesia%20:%20a%20comparison%20of%20fentanyl%20with%20morphine&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia&rft.au=HOWELL,%20P.%20R&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=41-45&rft.issn=0832-610X&rft.eissn=1496-8975&rft.coden=CJOAEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03010570&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E7889583%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/7889583&rfr_iscdi=true