Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension
This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after mor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in therapy 2003, Vol.20 (1), p.20-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Advances in therapy |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | NETLAND, Peter A MROZ, Michael ROSNER, Sarah A KATZMAN, Barry MACY, Jonathan I |
description | This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after morning instillation at weeks 2, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the mean IOP reduction from baseline. Secondary measures were the percentage of patients in each group who achieved specific low target pressures and the incidence of adverse events. Mean IOP at baseline was 24.8 mm Hg in each group. At follow-up visits, mean reductions from baseline ranged from 8.5 to 9.0 mm Hg with brimP/bim and from 7.5 to 7.7 mm Hg with tim/latan. More patients achieved low target pressures with brimP/bim. At week 12, 69.2% of brimP/bim patients and 27.3% of tim/latan patients had IOPs of 16 mm Hg or lower (P = .024). Both regimens were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent. The combination of brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost was well tolerated and at least as effective as Timoptic-XE and latanoprost in reducing IOP. More patients achieved low target IOPs with brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost than with Timoptic-XE and latanoprost. A larger study is needed to confirm these results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02850116 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02850116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>12772815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-c600c9b352bba38663eeb9d3d222cdea3380e304fe139feca0101eba99c0a1763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwBkosXoTpJ-pEedXFVWNCDgrcyTVM30qYlSZH111t3C3sY5vLMMPMScsnglgFkdw8r4DIBxtIjMmcyTaKx-DGZQxaziAv5OSNn3n8DcMgSeUpmjGcZlyyZk98HZ9rOmspYTd8GZ4KmaCtamhZD17vOB6q6tkenK_pjwoaG0Tdds1MNBrSTMpb2GIy2we_hV4PDOIo72amhQUc32167oK03nT0nJzU2Xl9MfUE-Vo_vy-do_fr0srxfR0owESKVAqi8FAkvSxQyTYXWZV6JinOuKo1CSNAC4lozkddaITBgusQ8V4AsS8WC3Oz3qvFO73Rd9OPP6LYFg-I_wOIQ4Iiv9rgfylZXBzolNoLrCaBX2NQOrTL-4GIJeRxL8Qce3Xsq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>NETLAND, Peter A ; MROZ, Michael ; ROSNER, Sarah A ; KATZMAN, Barry ; MACY, Jonathan I</creator><creatorcontrib>NETLAND, Peter A ; MROZ, Michael ; ROSNER, Sarah A ; KATZMAN, Barry ; MACY, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><description>This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after morning instillation at weeks 2, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the mean IOP reduction from baseline. Secondary measures were the percentage of patients in each group who achieved specific low target pressures and the incidence of adverse events. Mean IOP at baseline was 24.8 mm Hg in each group. At follow-up visits, mean reductions from baseline ranged from 8.5 to 9.0 mm Hg with brimP/bim and from 7.5 to 7.7 mm Hg with tim/latan. More patients achieved low target pressures with brimP/bim. At week 12, 69.2% of brimP/bim patients and 27.3% of tim/latan patients had IOPs of 16 mm Hg or lower (P = .024). Both regimens were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent. The combination of brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost was well tolerated and at least as effective as Timoptic-XE and latanoprost in reducing IOP. More patients achieved low target IOPs with brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost than with Timoptic-XE and latanoprost. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02850116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12772815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edison, NJ: Health Communications</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amides ; Bimatoprost ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brimonidine Tartrate ; Cloprostenol - analogs & derivatives ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis ; Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - drug effects ; Lipids - administration & dosage ; Lipids - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis ; Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; Probability ; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - administration & dosage ; Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - adverse effects ; Quinoxalines - administration & dosage ; Quinoxalines - adverse effects ; Reference Values ; Risk Assessment ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Single-Blind Method ; Timolol - administration & dosage ; Timolol - adverse effects ; Tonometry, Ocular ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2003, Vol.20 (1), p.20-30</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-c600c9b352bba38663eeb9d3d222cdea3380e304fe139feca0101eba99c0a1763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-c600c9b352bba38663eeb9d3d222cdea3380e304fe139feca0101eba99c0a1763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14809448$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12772815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NETLAND, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MROZ, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSNER, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATZMAN, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACY, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><title>Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after morning instillation at weeks 2, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the mean IOP reduction from baseline. Secondary measures were the percentage of patients in each group who achieved specific low target pressures and the incidence of adverse events. Mean IOP at baseline was 24.8 mm Hg in each group. At follow-up visits, mean reductions from baseline ranged from 8.5 to 9.0 mm Hg with brimP/bim and from 7.5 to 7.7 mm Hg with tim/latan. More patients achieved low target pressures with brimP/bim. At week 12, 69.2% of brimP/bim patients and 27.3% of tim/latan patients had IOPs of 16 mm Hg or lower (P = .024). Both regimens were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent. The combination of brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost was well tolerated and at least as effective as Timoptic-XE and latanoprost in reducing IOP. More patients achieved low target IOPs with brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost than with Timoptic-XE and latanoprost. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amides</subject><subject>Bimatoprost</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brimonidine Tartrate</subject><subject>Cloprostenol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Lipids - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lipids - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ophthalmic Solutions</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Quinoxalines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Quinoxalines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Timolol - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Timolol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E1LxDAQBuAgiruuXvwBkosXoTpJ-pEedXFVWNCDgrcyTVM30qYlSZH111t3C3sY5vLMMPMScsnglgFkdw8r4DIBxtIjMmcyTaKx-DGZQxaziAv5OSNn3n8DcMgSeUpmjGcZlyyZk98HZ9rOmspYTd8GZ4KmaCtamhZD17vOB6q6tkenK_pjwoaG0Tdds1MNBrSTMpb2GIy2we_hV4PDOIo72amhQUc32167oK03nT0nJzU2Xl9MfUE-Vo_vy-do_fr0srxfR0owESKVAqi8FAkvSxQyTYXWZV6JinOuKo1CSNAC4lozkddaITBgusQ8V4AsS8WC3Oz3qvFO73Rd9OPP6LYFg-I_wOIQ4Iiv9rgfylZXBzolNoLrCaBX2NQOrTL-4GIJeRxL8Qce3Xsq</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>NETLAND, Peter A</creator><creator>MROZ, Michael</creator><creator>ROSNER, Sarah A</creator><creator>KATZMAN, Barry</creator><creator>MACY, Jonathan I</creator><general>Health Communications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension</title><author>NETLAND, Peter A ; MROZ, Michael ; ROSNER, Sarah A ; KATZMAN, Barry ; MACY, Jonathan I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-c600c9b352bba38663eeb9d3d222cdea3380e304fe139feca0101eba99c0a1763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amides</topic><topic>Bimatoprost</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brimonidine Tartrate</topic><topic>Cloprostenol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Lipids - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lipids - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ophthalmic Solutions</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Quinoxalines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Quinoxalines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Timolol - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Timolol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NETLAND, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MROZ, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSNER, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KATZMAN, Barry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACY, Jonathan I</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NETLAND, Peter A</au><au>MROZ, Michael</au><au>ROSNER, Sarah A</au><au>KATZMAN, Barry</au><au>MACY, Jonathan I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>20-30</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>This 3-month multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group study compared brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost (brimP/bim) with timolol gel-forming solution and latanoprost (tim/latan) in 28 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. IOP was measured at baseline and 2 hours after morning instillation at weeks 2, 4, and 12. The primary outcome measure was the mean IOP reduction from baseline. Secondary measures were the percentage of patients in each group who achieved specific low target pressures and the incidence of adverse events. Mean IOP at baseline was 24.8 mm Hg in each group. At follow-up visits, mean reductions from baseline ranged from 8.5 to 9.0 mm Hg with brimP/bim and from 7.5 to 7.7 mm Hg with tim/latan. More patients achieved low target pressures with brimP/bim. At week 12, 69.2% of brimP/bim patients and 27.3% of tim/latan patients had IOPs of 16 mm Hg or lower (P = .024). Both regimens were well tolerated, and adverse events were infrequent. The combination of brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost was well tolerated and at least as effective as Timoptic-XE and latanoprost in reducing IOP. More patients achieved low target IOPs with brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost than with Timoptic-XE and latanoprost. A larger study is needed to confirm these results.</abstract><cop>Edison, NJ</cop><pub>Health Communications</pub><pmid>12772815</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02850116</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0741-238X |
ispartof | Advances in therapy, 2003, Vol.20 (1), p.20-30 |
issn | 0741-238X 1865-8652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02850116 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Administration, Topical Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amides Bimatoprost Biological and medical sciences Brimonidine Tartrate Cloprostenol - analogs & derivatives Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug Administration Schedule Drug Therapy, Combination Female Follow-Up Studies Glaucoma, Open-Angle - diagnosis Glaucoma, Open-Angle - drug therapy Humans Intraocular Pressure - drug effects Lipids - administration & dosage Lipids - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Ocular Hypertension - diagnosis Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy Ophthalmic Solutions Probability Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - administration & dosage Prostaglandins F, Synthetic - adverse effects Quinoxalines - administration & dosage Quinoxalines - adverse effects Reference Values Risk Assessment Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Single-Blind Method Timolol - administration & dosage Timolol - adverse effects Tonometry, Ocular Treatment Outcome |
title | Brimonidine Purite and bimatoprost compared with timolol and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A28%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brimonidine%20Purite%20and%20bimatoprost%20compared%20with%20timolol%20and%20latanoprost%20in%20patients%20with%20glaucoma%20and%20ocular%20hypertension&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=NETLAND,%20Peter%20A&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=20-30&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02850116&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E12772815%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12772815&rfr_iscdi=true |