Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction

Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2004-09, Vol.21 (5), p.322-328
Hauptverfasser: Giuffre, R Michael, Ryerson, Lindsay M, Vanderkooi, Otto G, Leung, Alexander K C, Collins-Nakai, Ruth L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 328
container_issue 5
container_start_page 322
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 21
creator Giuffre, R Michael
Ryerson, Lindsay M
Vanderkooi, Otto G
Leung, Alexander K C
Collins-Nakai, Ruth L
description Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0 +/- 30.4 vs 22.77 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, P = .0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48 +/- 9.7 vs 1.56 +/- 6.5 mm Hg/y, P = .007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P = .045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02850036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02850036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15727401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-cdd3bfdb0137cffb354175e9bd36e8df41d691e4131ddfc6c421de0b0e7aa1e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1KAzEYRYMotlY3PoBkLYx-X34m06UWq0LBhQruhvyWkZmmJBnEt7fSQheXuzlcuIeQa4Q7BFD3j0tgjQTg9QmZYlPLahd2SqagBFaMN18TcpHzNwADJZtzMkGpmBKAU7J8H9O6s7qncSw2Dp6G2Pfxp9usaUlel8FvCo2Bdjn2unhH82h0TKWzNJpc0mhLFzeX5CzoPvurQ8_I5_LpY_FSrd6eXxcPq8oyKUplneMmOAPIlQ3BcClQST83jte-cUGgq-foBXJ0LtjaCobOgwGvtEZf8xm53e_aFHNOPrTb1A06_bYI7b-M9ihjB9_s4e1oBu-O6OE9_wNPEVur</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Giuffre, R Michael ; Ryerson, Lindsay M ; Vanderkooi, Otto G ; Leung, Alexander K C ; Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</creator><creatorcontrib>Giuffre, R Michael ; Ryerson, Lindsay M ; Vanderkooi, Otto G ; Leung, Alexander K C ; Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0 +/- 30.4 vs 22.77 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, P = .0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48 +/- 9.7 vs 1.56 +/- 6.5 mm Hg/y, P = .007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P = .045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02850036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15727401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - complications ; Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - physiopathology ; Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2004-09, Vol.21 (5), p.322-328</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-cdd3bfdb0137cffb354175e9bd36e8df41d691e4131ddfc6c421de0b0e7aa1e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-cdd3bfdb0137cffb354175e9bd36e8df41d691e4131ddfc6c421de0b0e7aa1e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15727401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giuffre, R Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryerson, Lindsay M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderkooi, Otto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Alexander K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0 +/- 30.4 vs 22.77 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, P = .0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48 +/- 9.7 vs 1.56 +/- 6.5 mm Hg/y, P = .007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P = .045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1KAzEYRYMotlY3PoBkLYx-X34m06UWq0LBhQruhvyWkZmmJBnEt7fSQheXuzlcuIeQa4Q7BFD3j0tgjQTg9QmZYlPLahd2SqagBFaMN18TcpHzNwADJZtzMkGpmBKAU7J8H9O6s7qncSw2Dp6G2Pfxp9usaUlel8FvCo2Bdjn2unhH82h0TKWzNJpc0mhLFzeX5CzoPvurQ8_I5_LpY_FSrd6eXxcPq8oyKUplneMmOAPIlQ3BcClQST83jte-cUGgq-foBXJ0LtjaCobOgwGvtEZf8xm53e_aFHNOPrTb1A06_bYI7b-M9ihjB9_s4e1oBu-O6OE9_wNPEVur</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Giuffre, R Michael</creator><creator>Ryerson, Lindsay M</creator><creator>Vanderkooi, Otto G</creator><creator>Leung, Alexander K C</creator><creator>Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction</title><author>Giuffre, R Michael ; Ryerson, Lindsay M ; Vanderkooi, Otto G ; Leung, Alexander K C ; Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-cdd3bfdb0137cffb354175e9bd36e8df41d691e4131ddfc6c421de0b0e7aa1e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giuffre, R Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryerson, Lindsay M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderkooi, Otto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Alexander K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giuffre, R Michael</au><au>Ryerson, Lindsay M</au><au>Vanderkooi, Otto G</au><au>Leung, Alexander K C</au><au>Collins-Nakai, Ruth L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>328</epage><pages>322-328</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Surgical and nonsurgical patients with isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS) were compared to determine the important factors contributing to the timing of surgical intervention. This study reviews 49 consecutive patients (27 surgical and 22 nonsurgical) aged 1.8 to 15.9 years with isolated SAS. The preoperative peak left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient in surgical patients was significantly higher than the gradient in nonsurgical patients (59.0 +/- 30.4 vs 22.77 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, P = .0001). The progression in LVOT gradient analyzed by echo Doppler was significantly higher in the surgical group compared with the nonsurgical group (10.48 +/- 9.7 vs 1.56 +/- 6.5 mm Hg/y, P = .007). Repeat surgical intervention was required in 22% of patients in the surgical group for recurrence of SAS, and 4% needed a third surgery. The progression in the severity of aortic regurgitation (AR) was not significantly different in the surgical and nonsurgical groups. There was a significant association between the development of AR and patients undergoing surgery (P = .045). AR may not be a reliable indication for early operative intervention in isolated SAS as there was no significant difference in its progression with surgical and nonsurgical patients. Asymptomatic patients with isolated SAS may warrant surgical intervention on the basis of progression of LVOT gradient, rather than the development or progression of AR.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>15727401</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02850036</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2004-09, Vol.21 (5), p.322-328
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02850036
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - complications
Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - physiopathology
Discrete Subaortic Stenosis - surgery
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
title Surgical outcome following treatment of isolated subaortic obstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A15%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20outcome%20following%20treatment%20of%20isolated%20subaortic%20obstruction&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Giuffre,%20R%20Michael&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=328&rft.pages=322-328&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02850036&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15727401%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15727401&rfr_iscdi=true