Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters

The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subject...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.5-22
1. Verfasser: Rieber, Lloyd P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 44
creator Rieber, Lloyd P.
description The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subjects interacted with the computer simulation using a discovery-based approach: no formal instruction on the science concepts was presented. Subjects had control over the acceleration of a simple screen object--a ball-in a game-like context. Three simulation conditions were studied, each differing on how feedback of the ball's speed, direction, and position was represented: graphical feedback, textual feedback, and graphical plus textual feedback. Results showed that subjects learned more tacit knowledge when provided with animated graphical feedback than with textual feedback, although gains in explicit understanding of these science principles did not depend on the way the feedback was represented. Patterns of interactivity and frustration are also discussed. 1 Please note that standard units of measurement (i.e., centimeters and seconds) are being used here to help the reader understand the nature of the simulation activity even though there was no attempt to calibrate the simulation to these standards. The speed of the animated object was based on units of distance and time that were unique to the simulations. For example, distance was measured in pixels and time measured in simulation cycles. Of course, all units of measurement are arbitrary conventions and the actual choices for these units do not matter so long as they remain consistent. 2. Obviously, an adequate understanding of the relationship between acceleration and velocity is prerequisite to fully understanding the nature of the task that subjects experienced in this study. An adequate explanation of the underlying physics principles is beyond the scope of this article. Unfortunately, the static medium of a journal article does a poor job of representing such a dynamic system.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02300323
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02300323</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ520274</ericid><jstor_id>30220136</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30220136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a88a5bd8c562d9a0b5bd970518530ed0685e9af452748b4d7fabe7290f6182dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtLw0AQxhdRsFYvnhVy8CREZ3ezj3hrS-uDiuDjHCa7G0htk7CbHvzvXRtp5zLz8f2-gRlCLincUQB1P10A4wCc8SMyokLIVAqgx3GGjKVUsvyUnIWwglhK6hFZTpp6g33dNgmGZOGcLdF8J3WUyazddNve-XSKwdnko95s1zv0IXl3nXfBNf0QfcU-cuGcnFS4Du7iv4_J12L-OXtKl2-Pz7PJMjUcaJ-i1ihKq42QzOYIZRS5AkG14OAsSC1cjlUmmMp0mVlVYekUy6GSVDNr-JjcDnuNb0Pwrio6H6_wPwWF4u8PxeEPEb4Z4A6DwXXlsTF12Cc4U5CrLGJXA-Z8bfbu_EUwYDv7erBXoW_9IQ2MAeWS_wKQVG6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rieber, Lloyd P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rieber, Lloyd P.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subjects interacted with the computer simulation using a discovery-based approach: no formal instruction on the science concepts was presented. Subjects had control over the acceleration of a simple screen object--a ball-in a game-like context. Three simulation conditions were studied, each differing on how feedback of the ball's speed, direction, and position was represented: graphical feedback, textual feedback, and graphical plus textual feedback. Results showed that subjects learned more tacit knowledge when provided with animated graphical feedback than with textual feedback, although gains in explicit understanding of these science principles did not depend on the way the feedback was represented. Patterns of interactivity and frustration are also discussed. 1 Please note that standard units of measurement (i.e., centimeters and seconds) are being used here to help the reader understand the nature of the simulation activity even though there was no attempt to calibrate the simulation to these standards. The speed of the animated object was based on units of distance and time that were unique to the simulations. For example, distance was measured in pixels and time measured in simulation cycles. Of course, all units of measurement are arbitrary conventions and the actual choices for these units do not matter so long as they remain consistent. 2. Obviously, an adequate understanding of the relationship between acceleration and velocity is prerequisite to fully understanding the nature of the task that subjects experienced in this study. An adequate explanation of the underlying physics principles is beyond the scope of this article. Unfortunately, the static medium of a journal article does a poor job of representing such a dynamic system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02300323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Automatic teaching ; Coding theory ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Computer Graphics ; Computer Simulation ; Educational Methods ; Educational research ; Educational sciences ; Examples ; Experiential Learning ; Experimentation ; Feedback ; Graduate Students ; Higher Education ; Interaction ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Modeling ; Multimedia Instruction ; Posttests ; Pretests ; Researchs ; Simulated Environment ; Simulations ; Speed ; Teaching aids ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.5-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a88a5bd8c562d9a0b5bd970518530ed0685e9af452748b4d7fabe7290f6182dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a88a5bd8c562d9a0b5bd970518530ed0685e9af452748b4d7fabe7290f6182dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30220136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30220136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ520274$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3270974$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rieber, Lloyd P.</creatorcontrib><title>Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subjects interacted with the computer simulation using a discovery-based approach: no formal instruction on the science concepts was presented. Subjects had control over the acceleration of a simple screen object--a ball-in a game-like context. Three simulation conditions were studied, each differing on how feedback of the ball's speed, direction, and position was represented: graphical feedback, textual feedback, and graphical plus textual feedback. Results showed that subjects learned more tacit knowledge when provided with animated graphical feedback than with textual feedback, although gains in explicit understanding of these science principles did not depend on the way the feedback was represented. Patterns of interactivity and frustration are also discussed. 1 Please note that standard units of measurement (i.e., centimeters and seconds) are being used here to help the reader understand the nature of the simulation activity even though there was no attempt to calibrate the simulation to these standards. The speed of the animated object was based on units of distance and time that were unique to the simulations. For example, distance was measured in pixels and time measured in simulation cycles. Of course, all units of measurement are arbitrary conventions and the actual choices for these units do not matter so long as they remain consistent. 2. Obviously, an adequate understanding of the relationship between acceleration and velocity is prerequisite to fully understanding the nature of the task that subjects experienced in this study. An adequate explanation of the underlying physics principles is beyond the scope of this article. Unfortunately, the static medium of a journal article does a poor job of representing such a dynamic system.</description><subject>Automatic teaching</subject><subject>Coding theory</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Educational Methods</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Examples</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Multimedia Instruction</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Pretests</subject><subject>Researchs</subject><subject>Simulated Environment</subject><subject>Simulations</subject><subject>Speed</subject><subject>Teaching aids</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtLw0AQxhdRsFYvnhVy8CREZ3ezj3hrS-uDiuDjHCa7G0htk7CbHvzvXRtp5zLz8f2-gRlCLincUQB1P10A4wCc8SMyokLIVAqgx3GGjKVUsvyUnIWwglhK6hFZTpp6g33dNgmGZOGcLdF8J3WUyazddNve-XSKwdnko95s1zv0IXl3nXfBNf0QfcU-cuGcnFS4Du7iv4_J12L-OXtKl2-Pz7PJMjUcaJ-i1ihKq42QzOYIZRS5AkG14OAsSC1cjlUmmMp0mVlVYekUy6GSVDNr-JjcDnuNb0Pwrio6H6_wPwWF4u8PxeEPEb4Z4A6DwXXlsTF12Cc4U5CrLGJXA-Z8bfbu_EUwYDv7erBXoW_9IQ2MAeWS_wKQVG6A</recordid><startdate>19960101</startdate><enddate>19960101</enddate><creator>Rieber, Lloyd P.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960101</creationdate><title>Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters</title><author>Rieber, Lloyd P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-a88a5bd8c562d9a0b5bd970518530ed0685e9af452748b4d7fabe7290f6182dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Automatic teaching</topic><topic>Coding theory</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Educational Methods</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Examples</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Multimedia Instruction</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Pretests</topic><topic>Researchs</topic><topic>Simulated Environment</topic><topic>Simulations</topic><topic>Speed</topic><topic>Teaching aids</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rieber, Lloyd P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rieber, Lloyd P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ520274</ericid><atitle>Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>1996-01-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>5-22</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subjects interacted with the computer simulation using a discovery-based approach: no formal instruction on the science concepts was presented. Subjects had control over the acceleration of a simple screen object--a ball-in a game-like context. Three simulation conditions were studied, each differing on how feedback of the ball's speed, direction, and position was represented: graphical feedback, textual feedback, and graphical plus textual feedback. Results showed that subjects learned more tacit knowledge when provided with animated graphical feedback than with textual feedback, although gains in explicit understanding of these science principles did not depend on the way the feedback was represented. Patterns of interactivity and frustration are also discussed. 1 Please note that standard units of measurement (i.e., centimeters and seconds) are being used here to help the reader understand the nature of the simulation activity even though there was no attempt to calibrate the simulation to these standards. The speed of the animated object was based on units of distance and time that were unique to the simulations. For example, distance was measured in pixels and time measured in simulation cycles. Of course, all units of measurement are arbitrary conventions and the actual choices for these units do not matter so long as they remain consistent. 2. Obviously, an adequate understanding of the relationship between acceleration and velocity is prerequisite to fully understanding the nature of the task that subjects experienced in this study. An adequate explanation of the underlying physics principles is beyond the scope of this article. Unfortunately, the static medium of a journal article does a poor job of representing such a dynamic system.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02300323</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 1996-01, Vol.44 (1), p.5-22
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF02300323
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Automatic teaching
Coding theory
Computer Assisted Instruction
Computer Graphics
Computer Simulation
Educational Methods
Educational research
Educational sciences
Examples
Experiential Learning
Experimentation
Feedback
Graduate Students
Higher Education
Interaction
Learning
Learning Processes
Modeling
Multimedia Instruction
Posttests
Pretests
Researchs
Simulated Environment
Simulations
Speed
Teaching aids
Velocity
title Animation as Feedback in a Computer-Based Simulation: Representation Matters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T14%3A14%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animation%20as%20Feedback%20in%20a%20Computer-Based%20Simulation:%20Representation%20Matters&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Rieber,%20Lloyd%20P.&rft.date=1996-01-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=5-22&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02300323&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E30220136%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ520274&rft_jstor_id=30220136&rfr_iscdi=true