An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring

A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Clinical Monitoring 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154
Hauptverfasser: Philip, J H, Raemer, D B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 154
container_issue 3
container_start_page 151
container_title Journal of Clinical Monitoring
container_volume 2
creator Philip, J H
Raemer, D B
description A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01620547
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01620547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77012070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LwzAchoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfDTJcpzDqTDwoueSpr9sHW0yk1Twv7fiUE_v5eHl4UHokpJbSoi6u18RKhkRpTpCUyoUL5ik5TGaElXOC6qVOkVnKe0IIWyu2QRNuColl_MpsguPoQObY_CtxSlD3oZkwx5wm_BuaDbQ4Bpyhojz1nhsg_8An9vgTfcfT9iFiI2HlLeQWoP78TCH2PrNOTpxpktwcdgZels9vC6fivXL4_NysS7sqJgLTZVsJGfAQEutnbRMCFZyqsragq2t0sYoLYkVAELUztXWGtdwo7VQ1vEZuv753cfwPowiVd8mC103WoUhVUoRyogiI3jzA9oYUorgqn1sexM_K0qq76LVX9ERvjq8DnUPzS96SMi_ANXOcys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77012070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</creator><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><description>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-1977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01620547</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3746368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Electronics, Medical ; Heart Auscultation - instrumentation ; Humans ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3746368$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><title>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><description>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Electronics, Medical</subject><subject>Heart Auscultation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><issn>0748-1977</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1LwzAchoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfDTJcpzDqTDwoueSpr9sHW0yk1Twv7fiUE_v5eHl4UHokpJbSoi6u18RKhkRpTpCUyoUL5ik5TGaElXOC6qVOkVnKe0IIWyu2QRNuColl_MpsguPoQObY_CtxSlD3oZkwx5wm_BuaDbQ4Bpyhojz1nhsg_8An9vgTfcfT9iFiI2HlLeQWoP78TCH2PrNOTpxpktwcdgZels9vC6fivXL4_NysS7sqJgLTZVsJGfAQEutnbRMCFZyqsragq2t0sYoLYkVAELUztXWGtdwo7VQ1vEZuv753cfwPowiVd8mC103WoUhVUoRyogiI3jzA9oYUorgqn1sexM_K0qq76LVX9ERvjq8DnUPzS96SMi_ANXOcys</recordid><startdate>198607</startdate><enddate>198607</enddate><creator>Philip, J H</creator><creator>Raemer, D B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198607</creationdate><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><author>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Electronics, Medical</topic><topic>Heart Auscultation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Philip, J H</au><au>Raemer, D B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><date>1986-07</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>151-154</pages><issn>0748-1977</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3746368</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01620547</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-1977
ispartof Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154
issn 0748-1977
1573-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01620547
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anesthesia
Electronics, Medical
Heart Auscultation - instrumentation
Humans
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
title An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20electronic%20stethoscope%20is%20judged%20better%20than%20conventional%20stethoscopes%20for%20anesthesia%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Monitoring&rft.au=Philip,%20J%20H&rft.date=1986-07&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=151-154&rft.issn=0748-1977&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01620547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77012070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77012070&rft_id=info:pmid/3746368&rfr_iscdi=true