An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring
A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Clinical Monitoring 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Journal of Clinical Monitoring |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Philip, J H Raemer, D B |
description | A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01620547 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01620547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77012070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1LwzAchoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfDTJcpzDqTDwoueSpr9sHW0yk1Twv7fiUE_v5eHl4UHokpJbSoi6u18RKhkRpTpCUyoUL5ik5TGaElXOC6qVOkVnKe0IIWyu2QRNuColl_MpsguPoQObY_CtxSlD3oZkwx5wm_BuaDbQ4Bpyhojz1nhsg_8An9vgTfcfT9iFiI2HlLeQWoP78TCH2PrNOTpxpktwcdgZels9vC6fivXL4_NysS7sqJgLTZVsJGfAQEutnbRMCFZyqsragq2t0sYoLYkVAELUztXWGtdwo7VQ1vEZuv753cfwPowiVd8mC103WoUhVUoRyogiI3jzA9oYUorgqn1sexM_K0qq76LVX9ERvjq8DnUPzS96SMi_ANXOcys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>77012070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</creator><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><description>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-1977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01620547</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3746368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Electronics, Medical ; Heart Auscultation - instrumentation ; Humans ; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3746368$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><title>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><description>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Electronics, Medical</subject><subject>Heart Auscultation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</subject><issn>0748-1977</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1LwzAchoMoc04v3oWcPAjVfDTJcpzDqTDwoueSpr9sHW0yk1Twv7fiUE_v5eHl4UHokpJbSoi6u18RKhkRpTpCUyoUL5ik5TGaElXOC6qVOkVnKe0IIWyu2QRNuColl_MpsguPoQObY_CtxSlD3oZkwx5wm_BuaDbQ4Bpyhojz1nhsg_8An9vgTfcfT9iFiI2HlLeQWoP78TCH2PrNOTpxpktwcdgZels9vC6fivXL4_NysS7sqJgLTZVsJGfAQEutnbRMCFZyqsragq2t0sYoLYkVAELUztXWGtdwo7VQ1vEZuv753cfwPowiVd8mC103WoUhVUoRyogiI3jzA9oYUorgqn1sexM_K0qq76LVX9ERvjq8DnUPzS96SMi_ANXOcys</recordid><startdate>198607</startdate><enddate>198607</enddate><creator>Philip, J H</creator><creator>Raemer, D B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198607</creationdate><title>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</title><author>Philip, J H ; Raemer, D B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-9176d632e2e9699f6c255243174bcecbc79aa7960c5ee55bffbccafd3a9957cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Electronics, Medical</topic><topic>Heart Auscultation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Philip, J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raemer, D B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Philip, J H</au><au>Raemer, D B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Monitoring</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit</addtitle><date>1986-07</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>151-154</pages><issn>0748-1977</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>A prototype electronic monitoring stethoscope was constructed from readily available, high-quality components. It consisted of a conventional precordial or esophageal probe connected to a microphone by a rubber adapter. The microphone was connected by lightweight wire to an amplifier and headphones. Twenty-one anesthesia clinicians evaluated the stethoscope and responded to a multiple-choice preference questionnaire. The electronic stethoscope was judged to perform better than the conventional stethoscope in most categories evaluated. The electronic device was perceived to be louder, clearer in sound reproduction, more efficacious for monitoring, and easier to use continuously, and its headphones were considered more comfortable than the conventional earpiece. Based on our results, we conclude that amplified stethoscopes have the potential to improve monitoring. Further development of electronic stethoscope monitoring seems warranted and is continuing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>3746368</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01620547</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-1977 |
ispartof | Journal of Clinical Monitoring, 1986-07, Vol.2 (3), p.151-154 |
issn | 0748-1977 1573-2614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01620547 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Anesthesia Electronics, Medical Heart Auscultation - instrumentation Humans Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation |
title | An electronic stethoscope is judged better than conventional stethoscopes for anesthesia monitoring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A43%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20electronic%20stethoscope%20is%20judged%20better%20than%20conventional%20stethoscopes%20for%20anesthesia%20monitoring&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Monitoring&rft.au=Philip,%20J%20H&rft.date=1986-07&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=151-154&rft.issn=0748-1977&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01620547&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E77012070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=77012070&rft_id=info:pmid/3746368&rfr_iscdi=true |