COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY?
This study examines ratings of cotherapist self-disclosure furnished by members in 20 outpatient groups. Clients completed a specially designed measure to assess three dimensions of therapist transparency: positive or negative valence, low or high risk, and the target of the disclosure, namely, the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Group (New York. 1977) 1993-09, Vol.17 (3), p.131-142 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 142 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Group (New York. 1977) |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | McNary, Scot W. Dies, Robert R. |
| description | This study examines ratings of cotherapist self-disclosure furnished by members in 20 outpatient groups. Clients completed a specially designed measure to assess three dimensions of therapist transparency: positive or negative valence, low or high risk, and the target of the disclosure, namely, the individual members, the group as a whole, the therapist her/himself, or the co-leader. Exploration of the frequency of therapist-to-therapist disclosure provided an evaluation of the modeling hypothesis that is so prevalent in the literature. The findings demonstrate that although the overall level of therapist selfdisclosure was quite low, results were consistent with expectations showing that most of the personal comments were positive, low risk, and rarely directed to the cotherapist. The viability of the modeling concept in co-led groups is challenged. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF01419672 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01419672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41718721</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41718721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-ee062f39d3a83362c076b74518a78d70bb56f92acf2a2e5dc5122f4f2bf4e2c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz0FLw0AQBeBFFKzVi3chB09CdHY22d0IImlsk0BMQpoeegqbbRZaqi3ZXvz3Rlrq6R3mm2EeIfcUnimAeJnMgHo04AIvyIj6grmMSX5JRsA4uh4gvSY31m4AIBDCH5G3qKiTaRWW6bx2PouPaZbmsZPmTlwVi9Ip58soOYnlqzMLo9opqiHzOpwv32_JlVFb292dckwWs2kdJW5WxGkUZq5GiQe364CjYcGKKcmGRzQI3grPp1IJuRLQtj43ASptUGHnr7RPEY1nsDVeh1qyMXk63tX9ztq-M82-X3-p_qeh0PwVb_6LD_jxiPfKarU1vfrWa3veYIIz4MHAHo5sYw-7_jz2qKBSIGW_eE1acw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>McNary, Scot W. ; Dies, Robert R.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNary, Scot W. ; Dies, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines ratings of cotherapist self-disclosure furnished by members in 20 outpatient groups. Clients completed a specially designed measure to assess three dimensions of therapist transparency: positive or negative valence, low or high risk, and the target of the disclosure, namely, the individual members, the group as a whole, the therapist her/himself, or the co-leader. Exploration of the frequency of therapist-to-therapist disclosure provided an evaluation of the modeling hypothesis that is so prevalent in the literature. The findings demonstrate that although the overall level of therapist selfdisclosure was quite low, results were consistent with expectations showing that most of the personal comments were positive, low risk, and rarely directed to the cotherapist. The viability of the modeling concept in co-led groups is challenged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-4021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01419672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GROUDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel Publishers</publisher><subject>Behavior modeling ; Biological and medical sciences ; Group processes ; Group psychotherapy ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Mental health ; Observational learning ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling ; Psychotherapy ; Research variables ; Statistical variance ; Treatments ; Verb valency</subject><ispartof>Group (New York. 1977), 1993-09, Vol.17 (3), p.131-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1993 Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-ee062f39d3a83362c076b74518a78d70bb56f92acf2a2e5dc5122f4f2bf4e2c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-ee062f39d3a83362c076b74518a78d70bb56f92acf2a2e5dc5122f4f2bf4e2c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41718721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41718721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3763069$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNary, Scot W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dies, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><title>COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY?</title><title>Group (New York. 1977)</title><description>This study examines ratings of cotherapist self-disclosure furnished by members in 20 outpatient groups. Clients completed a specially designed measure to assess three dimensions of therapist transparency: positive or negative valence, low or high risk, and the target of the disclosure, namely, the individual members, the group as a whole, the therapist her/himself, or the co-leader. Exploration of the frequency of therapist-to-therapist disclosure provided an evaluation of the modeling hypothesis that is so prevalent in the literature. The findings demonstrate that although the overall level of therapist selfdisclosure was quite low, results were consistent with expectations showing that most of the personal comments were positive, low risk, and rarely directed to the cotherapist. The viability of the modeling concept in co-led groups is challenged.</description><subject>Behavior modeling</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Group processes</subject><subject>Group psychotherapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Research variables</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Verb valency</subject><issn>0362-4021</issn><issn>1573-3386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz0FLw0AQBeBFFKzVi3chB09CdHY22d0IImlsk0BMQpoeegqbbRZaqi3ZXvz3Rlrq6R3mm2EeIfcUnimAeJnMgHo04AIvyIj6grmMSX5JRsA4uh4gvSY31m4AIBDCH5G3qKiTaRWW6bx2PouPaZbmsZPmTlwVi9Ip58soOYnlqzMLo9opqiHzOpwv32_JlVFb292dckwWs2kdJW5WxGkUZq5GiQe364CjYcGKKcmGRzQI3grPp1IJuRLQtj43ASptUGHnr7RPEY1nsDVeh1qyMXk63tX9ztq-M82-X3-p_qeh0PwVb_6LD_jxiPfKarU1vfrWa3veYIIz4MHAHo5sYw-7_jz2qKBSIGW_eE1acw</recordid><startdate>19930901</startdate><enddate>19930901</enddate><creator>McNary, Scot W.</creator><creator>Dies, Robert R.</creator><general>Brunner/Mazel Publishers</general><general>Human Sciences Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930901</creationdate><title>COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY?</title><author>McNary, Scot W. ; Dies, Robert R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-ee062f39d3a83362c076b74518a78d70bb56f92acf2a2e5dc5122f4f2bf4e2c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Behavior modeling</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Group processes</topic><topic>Group psychotherapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Research variables</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Verb valency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNary, Scot W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dies, Robert R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Group (New York. 1977)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNary, Scot W.</au><au>Dies, Robert R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY?</atitle><jtitle>Group (New York. 1977)</jtitle><date>1993-09-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>131-142</pages><issn>0362-4021</issn><eissn>1573-3386</eissn><coden>GROUDE</coden><abstract>This study examines ratings of cotherapist self-disclosure furnished by members in 20 outpatient groups. Clients completed a specially designed measure to assess three dimensions of therapist transparency: positive or negative valence, low or high risk, and the target of the disclosure, namely, the individual members, the group as a whole, the therapist her/himself, or the co-leader. Exploration of the frequency of therapist-to-therapist disclosure provided an evaluation of the modeling hypothesis that is so prevalent in the literature. The findings demonstrate that although the overall level of therapist selfdisclosure was quite low, results were consistent with expectations showing that most of the personal comments were positive, low risk, and rarely directed to the cotherapist. The viability of the modeling concept in co-led groups is challenged.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Brunner/Mazel Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/BF01419672</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0362-4021 |
| ispartof | Group (New York. 1977), 1993-09, Vol.17 (3), p.131-142 |
| issn | 0362-4021 1573-3386 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01419672 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR |
| subjects | Behavior modeling Biological and medical sciences Group processes Group psychotherapy Medical sciences Medical treatment Mental health Observational learning Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Psychotherapies. Psychological and clinical counseling Psychotherapy Research variables Statistical variance Treatments Verb valency |
| title | COTHERAPIST MODELING IN GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY: FACT OR FANTASY? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A11%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COTHERAPIST%20MODELING%20IN%20GROUP%20PSYCHOTHERAPY:%20FACT%20OR%20FANTASY?&rft.jtitle=Group%20(New%20York.%201977)&rft.au=McNary,%20Scot%20W.&rft.date=1993-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=131-142&rft.issn=0362-4021&rft.eissn=1573-3386&rft.coden=GROUDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01419672&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E41718721%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41718721&rfr_iscdi=true |