Faculty Reflect on Course Planning
Faculty members' beliefs about educational purpose and the nature of their academic fields strongly influence how they plan introductory courses. Interviews with 89 faculty members teaching in diverse colleges and representing eight fields also identified faculty attention to student preparatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in higher education 1988-11, Vol.29 (3), p.219-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 240 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | Research in higher education |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Stark, Joan S. Lowther, Malcolm A. Ryan, Michael P. Genthon, Michele |
description | Faculty members' beliefs about educational purpose and the nature of their academic fields strongly influence how they plan introductory courses. Interviews with 89 faculty members teaching in diverse colleges and representing eight fields also identified faculty attention to student preparation, available textbooks, and locally important factors, but little attention to alternative instructional strategies during course planning. Based on the findings, the authors have developed a tentative general model of course design and related questions to guide future study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00992924 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00992924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40195838</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40195838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-3df83a591629500481f104ca6472a134164194085ce6cbe01df4e8db971e4bf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz0FLxDAUBOAgCtbVi3eheBSi7zUvaXLUslVhQREFbyVNE9mltpJ0D_vvrazoZebyMTCMnSNcI0B5c1cDGFOYgg5YhrIUHLV-P2QZCIV8DnnMTlLawIwRVcYua-u2_bTLX3zovZvyccircRuTz597Owzr4eOUHQXbJ3_22wv2Vi9fqwe-erp_rG5X3BUSJy66oIWVBlVhJABpDAjkrKKysCgIFaEh0NJ55VoP2AXyumtNiZ7aQGLBrva7Lo4pRR-ar7j-tHHXIDQ_75r_dzO-2ONNmsb4JwnQSC20-AbQ6EjO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Reflect on Course Planning</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Stark, Joan S. ; Lowther, Malcolm A. ; Ryan, Michael P. ; Genthon, Michele</creator><creatorcontrib>Stark, Joan S. ; Lowther, Malcolm A. ; Ryan, Michael P. ; Genthon, Michele</creatorcontrib><description>Faculty members' beliefs about educational purpose and the nature of their academic fields strongly influence how they plan introductory courses. Interviews with 89 faculty members teaching in diverse colleges and representing eight fields also identified faculty attention to student preparation, available textbooks, and locally important factors, but little attention to alternative instructional strategies during course planning. Based on the findings, the authors have developed a tentative general model of course design and related questions to guide future study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-0365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-188X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00992924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Agathon Press, Inc</publisher><subject>Academic education ; Academic learning ; College instruction ; College students ; Colleges ; Course content ; Curricula ; Instructional development ; Introductory courses ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Research in higher education, 1988-11, Vol.29 (3), p.219-240</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1988 Agathon Press, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-3df83a591629500481f104ca6472a134164194085ce6cbe01df4e8db971e4bf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-3df83a591629500481f104ca6472a134164194085ce6cbe01df4e8db971e4bf43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40195838$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40195838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stark, Joan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowther, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genthon, Michele</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Reflect on Course Planning</title><title>Research in higher education</title><description>Faculty members' beliefs about educational purpose and the nature of their academic fields strongly influence how they plan introductory courses. Interviews with 89 faculty members teaching in diverse colleges and representing eight fields also identified faculty attention to student preparation, available textbooks, and locally important factors, but little attention to alternative instructional strategies during course planning. Based on the findings, the authors have developed a tentative general model of course design and related questions to guide future study.</description><subject>Academic education</subject><subject>Academic learning</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Course content</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Instructional development</subject><subject>Introductory courses</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0361-0365</issn><issn>1573-188X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz0FLxDAUBOAgCtbVi3eheBSi7zUvaXLUslVhQREFbyVNE9mltpJ0D_vvrazoZebyMTCMnSNcI0B5c1cDGFOYgg5YhrIUHLV-P2QZCIV8DnnMTlLawIwRVcYua-u2_bTLX3zovZvyccircRuTz597Owzr4eOUHQXbJ3_22wv2Vi9fqwe-erp_rG5X3BUSJy66oIWVBlVhJABpDAjkrKKysCgIFaEh0NJ55VoP2AXyumtNiZ7aQGLBrva7Lo4pRR-ar7j-tHHXIDQ_75r_dzO-2ONNmsb4JwnQSC20-AbQ6EjO</recordid><startdate>198811</startdate><enddate>198811</enddate><creator>Stark, Joan S.</creator><creator>Lowther, Malcolm A.</creator><creator>Ryan, Michael P.</creator><creator>Genthon, Michele</creator><general>Agathon Press, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198811</creationdate><title>Faculty Reflect on Course Planning</title><author>Stark, Joan S. ; Lowther, Malcolm A. ; Ryan, Michael P. ; Genthon, Michele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c251t-3df83a591629500481f104ca6472a134164194085ce6cbe01df4e8db971e4bf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Academic education</topic><topic>Academic learning</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Course content</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Instructional development</topic><topic>Introductory courses</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stark, Joan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowther, Malcolm A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genthon, Michele</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stark, Joan S.</au><au>Lowther, Malcolm A.</au><au>Ryan, Michael P.</au><au>Genthon, Michele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Faculty Reflect on Course Planning</atitle><jtitle>Research in higher education</jtitle><date>1988-11</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>219-240</pages><issn>0361-0365</issn><eissn>1573-188X</eissn><abstract>Faculty members' beliefs about educational purpose and the nature of their academic fields strongly influence how they plan introductory courses. Interviews with 89 faculty members teaching in diverse colleges and representing eight fields also identified faculty attention to student preparation, available textbooks, and locally important factors, but little attention to alternative instructional strategies during course planning. Based on the findings, the authors have developed a tentative general model of course design and related questions to guide future study.</abstract><pub>Agathon Press, Inc</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00992924</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-0365 |
ispartof | Research in higher education, 1988-11, Vol.29 (3), p.219-240 |
issn | 0361-0365 1573-188X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00992924 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Academic education Academic learning College instruction College students Colleges Course content Curricula Instructional development Introductory courses Teachers |
title | Faculty Reflect on Course Planning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Reflect%20on%20Course%20Planning&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Stark,%20Joan%20S.&rft.date=1988-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=219-240&rft.issn=0361-0365&rft.eissn=1573-188X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00992924&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E40195838%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40195838&rfr_iscdi=true |