Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer

Patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated in two multicenter trials with different cytostatic drug regimens including ifosfamide. In the first randomized study, including 306 patients, alternating chemotherapy with VP 16, ifosfamide, vindesine (VPIV), adriamycin, cisplatinum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 1986, Vol.18 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S40-S44
Hauptverfasser: Havemann, K, Gropp, C, Klapsing, J, Viktor, N, Holle, R, Drings, P, Manke, H G, Hans, K, Schroeder, M, Heim, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S44
container_issue S2
container_start_page S40
container_title Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
container_volume 18 Suppl 2
creator Havemann, K
Gropp, C
Klapsing, J
Viktor, N
Holle, R
Drings, P
Manke, H G
Hans, K
Schroeder, M
Heim, M
description Patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated in two multicenter trials with different cytostatic drug regimens including ifosfamide. In the first randomized study, including 306 patients, alternating chemotherapy with VP 16, ifosfamide, vindesine (VPIV), adriamycin, cisplatinum, vincristine (APO), and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, CCNU (CMCC) was compared against standard treatment with ACO (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine). It was shown that the alternating therapy resulted in a higher response rate (88% vs 78%) and a longer median survival time (11 months vs 10 months). Regarding toxicity, VPIV was similar to ACO, whereas APO and CMCC had more side-effects, leading to an increase in the number of drop-outs. In the second randomized study 144 patients were treated either with ifosfamide/VP 16 (IVP) or with cisplatinum/VP 16 (PVP). In the case of no further response, no change, or progression the induction therapy was changed to ACO. Interim analyses show that both regimens have similar therapeutic effects; but higher toxicity was observed in patients treated with cis-platinum/VP 16 than in patients treated with ifosfamide/VP 16. According to the response rate in patients treated with ACO after first-line therapy there was less cross-resistance of IVP than of PVP to ACO.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00647450
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00647450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3028663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-31573797ff5f767d2e7174f69ddea61575b09b8e0520b935a963f2600e28f7e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AURQdRaqxu3AuzFqJv8uYjWWppVSjooq7DJHljI0kmTFKk_nojLbq5d3EPd3EYuxZwJwDM_eMKQEsjFZywSEhMYkglnrIIUMpYGZDn7GIYPgFACsQZmyEkqdYYsbfNl-fBdpVv62-q-Bhq2wzc-cBtM1Lo7Fh3H7z3zb7cUuvHLQXb77l3fGht0_CSpmh2E1ParqRwyc7c9EBXx56z99Vys3iO169PL4uHdVwKpccYhTJoMuOcckabKiEjjHQ6qyqyehpVAVmREqgEigyVzTS6RANQkjpDGc7Z7eG3DH4YArm8D3Vrwz4XkP9ayf-tTPDNAe53RUvVH3rUgD9df1w6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Havemann, K ; Gropp, C ; Klapsing, J ; Viktor, N ; Holle, R ; Drings, P ; Manke, H G ; Hans, K ; Schroeder, M ; Heim, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Havemann, K ; Gropp, C ; Klapsing, J ; Viktor, N ; Holle, R ; Drings, P ; Manke, H G ; Hans, K ; Schroeder, M ; Heim, M</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated in two multicenter trials with different cytostatic drug regimens including ifosfamide. In the first randomized study, including 306 patients, alternating chemotherapy with VP 16, ifosfamide, vindesine (VPIV), adriamycin, cisplatinum, vincristine (APO), and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, CCNU (CMCC) was compared against standard treatment with ACO (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine). It was shown that the alternating therapy resulted in a higher response rate (88% vs 78%) and a longer median survival time (11 months vs 10 months). Regarding toxicity, VPIV was similar to ACO, whereas APO and CMCC had more side-effects, leading to an increase in the number of drop-outs. In the second randomized study 144 patients were treated either with ifosfamide/VP 16 (IVP) or with cisplatinum/VP 16 (PVP). In the case of no further response, no change, or progression the induction therapy was changed to ACO. Interim analyses show that both regimens have similar therapeutic effects; but higher toxicity was observed in patients treated with cis-platinum/VP 16 than in patients treated with ifosfamide/VP 16. According to the response rate in patients treated with ACO after first-line therapy there was less cross-resistance of IVP than of PVP to ACO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0344-5704</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00647450</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3028663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage ; Carcinoma, Small Cell - drug therapy ; Carcinoma, Small Cell - mortality ; Cisplatin - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cyclophosphamide - therapeutic use ; Doxorubicin - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Ifosfamide - therapeutic use ; Lomustine - therapeutic use ; Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Lung Neoplasms - mortality ; Methotrexate - therapeutic use ; Podophyllotoxin - therapeutic use ; Random Allocation ; Sex Factors ; Smoking ; Time Factors ; Vincristine - therapeutic use ; Vindesine - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1986, Vol.18 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S40-S44</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-31573797ff5f767d2e7174f69ddea61575b09b8e0520b935a963f2600e28f7e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3028663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Havemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gropp, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapsing, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holle, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drings, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manke, H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hans, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, M</creatorcontrib><title>Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer</title><title>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated in two multicenter trials with different cytostatic drug regimens including ifosfamide. In the first randomized study, including 306 patients, alternating chemotherapy with VP 16, ifosfamide, vindesine (VPIV), adriamycin, cisplatinum, vincristine (APO), and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, CCNU (CMCC) was compared against standard treatment with ACO (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine). It was shown that the alternating therapy resulted in a higher response rate (88% vs 78%) and a longer median survival time (11 months vs 10 months). Regarding toxicity, VPIV was similar to ACO, whereas APO and CMCC had more side-effects, leading to an increase in the number of drop-outs. In the second randomized study 144 patients were treated either with ifosfamide/VP 16 (IVP) or with cisplatinum/VP 16 (PVP). In the case of no further response, no change, or progression the induction therapy was changed to ACO. Interim analyses show that both regimens have similar therapeutic effects; but higher toxicity was observed in patients treated with cis-platinum/VP 16 than in patients treated with ifosfamide/VP 16. According to the response rate in patients treated with ACO after first-line therapy there was less cross-resistance of IVP than of PVP to ACO.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Small Cell - drug therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Small Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cyclophosphamide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ifosfamide - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lomustine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Methotrexate - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Podophyllotoxin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vincristine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Vindesine - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0344-5704</issn><issn>1432-0843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AURQdRaqxu3AuzFqJv8uYjWWppVSjooq7DJHljI0kmTFKk_nojLbq5d3EPd3EYuxZwJwDM_eMKQEsjFZywSEhMYkglnrIIUMpYGZDn7GIYPgFACsQZmyEkqdYYsbfNl-fBdpVv62-q-Bhq2wzc-cBtM1Lo7Fh3H7z3zb7cUuvHLQXb77l3fGht0_CSpmh2E1ParqRwyc7c9EBXx56z99Vys3iO169PL4uHdVwKpccYhTJoMuOcckabKiEjjHQ6qyqyehpVAVmREqgEigyVzTS6RANQkjpDGc7Z7eG3DH4YArm8D3Vrwz4XkP9ayf-tTPDNAe53RUvVH3rUgD9df1w6</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Havemann, K</creator><creator>Gropp, C</creator><creator>Klapsing, J</creator><creator>Viktor, N</creator><creator>Holle, R</creator><creator>Drings, P</creator><creator>Manke, H G</creator><creator>Hans, K</creator><creator>Schroeder, M</creator><creator>Heim, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer</title><author>Havemann, K ; Gropp, C ; Klapsing, J ; Viktor, N ; Holle, R ; Drings, P ; Manke, H G ; Hans, K ; Schroeder, M ; Heim, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-31573797ff5f767d2e7174f69ddea61575b09b8e0520b935a963f2600e28f7e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Small Cell - drug therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Small Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Cisplatin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cyclophosphamide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ifosfamide - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lomustine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Methotrexate - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Podophyllotoxin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vincristine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Vindesine - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Havemann, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gropp, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapsing, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viktor, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holle, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drings, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manke, H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hans, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Havemann, K</au><au>Gropp, C</au><au>Klapsing, J</au><au>Viktor, N</au><au>Holle, R</au><au>Drings, P</au><au>Manke, H G</au><au>Hans, K</au><au>Schroeder, M</au><au>Heim, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Chemother Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>18 Suppl 2</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>S40</spage><epage>S44</epage><pages>S40-S44</pages><issn>0344-5704</issn><eissn>1432-0843</eissn><abstract>Patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated in two multicenter trials with different cytostatic drug regimens including ifosfamide. In the first randomized study, including 306 patients, alternating chemotherapy with VP 16, ifosfamide, vindesine (VPIV), adriamycin, cisplatinum, vincristine (APO), and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, CCNU (CMCC) was compared against standard treatment with ACO (adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine). It was shown that the alternating therapy resulted in a higher response rate (88% vs 78%) and a longer median survival time (11 months vs 10 months). Regarding toxicity, VPIV was similar to ACO, whereas APO and CMCC had more side-effects, leading to an increase in the number of drop-outs. In the second randomized study 144 patients were treated either with ifosfamide/VP 16 (IVP) or with cisplatinum/VP 16 (PVP). In the case of no further response, no change, or progression the induction therapy was changed to ACO. Interim analyses show that both regimens have similar therapeutic effects; but higher toxicity was observed in patients treated with cis-platinum/VP 16 than in patients treated with ifosfamide/VP 16. According to the response rate in patients treated with ACO after first-line therapy there was less cross-resistance of IVP than of PVP to ACO.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>3028663</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00647450</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0344-5704
ispartof Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1986, Vol.18 Suppl 2 (S2), p.S40-S44
issn 0344-5704
1432-0843
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00647450
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Age Factors
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Small Cell - drug therapy
Carcinoma, Small Cell - mortality
Cisplatin - therapeutic use
Clinical Trials as Topic
Cyclophosphamide - therapeutic use
Doxorubicin - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Ifosfamide - therapeutic use
Lomustine - therapeutic use
Lung Neoplasms - drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms - mortality
Methotrexate - therapeutic use
Podophyllotoxin - therapeutic use
Random Allocation
Sex Factors
Smoking
Time Factors
Vincristine - therapeutic use
Vindesine - therapeutic use
title Two randomized trials for alternating polychemotherapy of small cell lung cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T02%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20randomized%20trials%20for%20alternating%20polychemotherapy%20of%20small%20cell%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20chemotherapy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Havemann,%20K&rft.date=1986&rft.volume=18%20Suppl%202&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=S40&rft.epage=S44&rft.pages=S40-S44&rft.issn=0344-5704&rft.eissn=1432-0843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00647450&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E3028663%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/3028663&rfr_iscdi=true