A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease
First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1986-04, Vol.11 (12), p.474-477 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 477 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 474 |
| container_title | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | HASSAN, I. M MOHAMMED, M. M. J BADRUDDOSA, M MAHMOOD, A. R SAYED, M. E SIMO, M ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M YOUSEF, A. M |
| description | First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera interfaced with a Simis III Informatek computer. The results were compared with contrast angiography (CA). The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of both radionuclide techniques. The present data are based on 65 patients in whom CA and EGNA were performed. In 47 patients both FPRA and EGNA were performed. Results suggested that in ischemic heart disease (IHD) and valvular heart disease (VHD) the EGNA technique is well correlated with CA (r = 0.9 and 0.73, respectively). FPRA correlated well only with CA in IHD (r = 0.86), but not in VHD (r = 0.18). This study indicates that both FPRA and EGNA are sensitive, noninvasive techniques for measuring ejection fraction in IHD, while in VHD, EGNA is more sensitive technique than FPRA. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00252792 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00252792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>76950443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-8d245e4f9ffcbb8ee425c6fd218b24ea0463897af0f4fb633c25ae28cff8310d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMFO3TAQRa2KCh7QDXskL1AXldJObCexlxQVWgmpm7KOJs6YGCXxw3ZA_EM_unnliaorj3WPrmYOY2clfC4Bmi9frwFEJRoj3rFNWZemaECbA7YBqaCojWmO2HFKDwCglKwO2aGEsqoFbNjvS27DtMXoU5h5cDw_Bx6x92Fe7Oh74vRANq_fwkX8O_BMdpj940KJP_s8rAVzjpgyx_neh_uI2-GF-5n7ZAeavOUDYcy894kw0Ur1_AnHp2XE-H90yt47HBN92L8n7O7626-r78Xtz5sfV5e3hRWizoXuhapIOeOc7TpNpERla9eLUndCEYKqpTYNOnDKdbWUVlRIQlvntCyhlyfs42vvNobdGbmd1l1pHHGmsKS2qU21M7WCn15BG0NKkVy7jX7C-NKW0O7Ut__Ur_D5vnXpJurf0L3rNb_Y55gsjqvO2fr0hulGN5Uy8g_21o6X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>76950443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>HASSAN, I. M ; MOHAMMED, M. M. J ; BADRUDDOSA, M ; MAHMOOD, A. R ; SAYED, M. E ; SIMO, M ; ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M ; YOUSEF, A. M</creator><creatorcontrib>HASSAN, I. M ; MOHAMMED, M. M. J ; BADRUDDOSA, M ; MAHMOOD, A. R ; SAYED, M. E ; SIMO, M ; ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M ; YOUSEF, A. M</creatorcontrib><description>First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera interfaced with a Simis III Informatek computer. The results were compared with contrast angiography (CA). The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of both radionuclide techniques. The present data are based on 65 patients in whom CA and EGNA were performed. In 47 patients both FPRA and EGNA were performed. Results suggested that in ischemic heart disease (IHD) and valvular heart disease (VHD) the EGNA technique is well correlated with CA (r = 0.9 and 0.73, respectively). FPRA correlated well only with CA in IHD (r = 0.86), but not in VHD (r = 0.18). This study indicates that both FPRA and EGNA are sensitive, noninvasive techniques for measuring ejection fraction in IHD, while in VHD, EGNA is more sensitive technique than FPRA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-6997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00252792</identifier><identifier>PMID: 3015620</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJNMD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Angiography - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Coronary Disease - diagnosis ; Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Erythrocytes ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis ; Heart Valve Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radionuclide investigations ; Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m ; Stroke Volume</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 1986-04, Vol.11 (12), p.474-477</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-8d245e4f9ffcbb8ee425c6fd218b24ea0463897af0f4fb633c25ae28cff8310d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8787549$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3015620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HASSAN, I. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOHAMMED, M. M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BADRUDDOSA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAYED, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUSEF, A. M</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease</title><title>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera interfaced with a Simis III Informatek computer. The results were compared with contrast angiography (CA). The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of both radionuclide techniques. The present data are based on 65 patients in whom CA and EGNA were performed. In 47 patients both FPRA and EGNA were performed. Results suggested that in ischemic heart disease (IHD) and valvular heart disease (VHD) the EGNA technique is well correlated with CA (r = 0.9 and 0.73, respectively). FPRA correlated well only with CA in IHD (r = 0.86), but not in VHD (r = 0.18). This study indicates that both FPRA and EGNA are sensitive, noninvasive techniques for measuring ejection fraction in IHD, while in VHD, EGNA is more sensitive technique than FPRA.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radionuclide investigations</subject><subject>Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><issn>0340-6997</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMFO3TAQRa2KCh7QDXskL1AXldJObCexlxQVWgmpm7KOJs6YGCXxw3ZA_EM_unnliaorj3WPrmYOY2clfC4Bmi9frwFEJRoj3rFNWZemaECbA7YBqaCojWmO2HFKDwCglKwO2aGEsqoFbNjvS27DtMXoU5h5cDw_Bx6x92Fe7Oh74vRANq_fwkX8O_BMdpj940KJP_s8rAVzjpgyx_neh_uI2-GF-5n7ZAeavOUDYcy894kw0Ur1_AnHp2XE-H90yt47HBN92L8n7O7626-r78Xtz5sfV5e3hRWizoXuhapIOeOc7TpNpERla9eLUndCEYKqpTYNOnDKdbWUVlRIQlvntCyhlyfs42vvNobdGbmd1l1pHHGmsKS2qU21M7WCn15BG0NKkVy7jX7C-NKW0O7Ut__Ur_D5vnXpJurf0L3rNb_Y55gsjqvO2fr0hulGN5Uy8g_21o6X</recordid><startdate>198604</startdate><enddate>198604</enddate><creator>HASSAN, I. M</creator><creator>MOHAMMED, M. M. J</creator><creator>BADRUDDOSA, M</creator><creator>MAHMOOD, A. R</creator><creator>SAYED, M. E</creator><creator>SIMO, M</creator><creator>ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M</creator><creator>YOUSEF, A. M</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198604</creationdate><title>A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease</title><author>HASSAN, I. M ; MOHAMMED, M. M. J ; BADRUDDOSA, M ; MAHMOOD, A. R ; SAYED, M. E ; SIMO, M ; ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M ; YOUSEF, A. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-8d245e4f9ffcbb8ee425c6fd218b24ea0463897af0f4fb633c25ae28cff8310d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heart Valve Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radionuclide investigations</topic><topic>Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HASSAN, I. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOHAMMED, M. M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BADRUDDOSA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAHMOOD, A. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAYED, M. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMO, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YOUSEF, A. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HASSAN, I. M</au><au>MOHAMMED, M. M. J</au><au>BADRUDDOSA, M</au><au>MAHMOOD, A. R</au><au>SAYED, M. E</au><au>SIMO, M</au><au>ABDEL-DAYEM, H. M</au><au>YOUSEF, A. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>1986-04</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>474</spage><epage>477</epage><pages>474-477</pages><issn>0340-6997</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><coden>EJNMD9</coden><abstract>First-pass radionuclide angiography (FPRA) in the 30 degree right anterior oblique and equilibrium gated radionuclide angiography (EGNA) in the 45 degree left anterior oblique were used for quantitative measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Equipment used was a 400T gamma-camera interfaced with a Simis III Informatek computer. The results were compared with contrast angiography (CA). The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of both radionuclide techniques. The present data are based on 65 patients in whom CA and EGNA were performed. In 47 patients both FPRA and EGNA were performed. Results suggested that in ischemic heart disease (IHD) and valvular heart disease (VHD) the EGNA technique is well correlated with CA (r = 0.9 and 0.73, respectively). FPRA correlated well only with CA in IHD (r = 0.86), but not in VHD (r = 0.18). This study indicates that both FPRA and EGNA are sensitive, noninvasive techniques for measuring ejection fraction in IHD, while in VHD, EGNA is more sensitive technique than FPRA.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>3015620</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF00252792</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-6997 |
| ispartof | European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 1986-04, Vol.11 (12), p.474-477 |
| issn | 0340-6997 1619-7089 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00252792 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Angiography - methods Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular system Coronary Disease - diagnosis Coronary Disease - diagnostic imaging Erythrocytes Heart - diagnostic imaging Heart Valve Diseases - diagnosis Heart Valve Diseases - diagnostic imaging Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Middle Aged Radionuclide Imaging Radionuclide investigations Sodium Pertechnetate Tc 99m Stroke Volume |
| title | A comparison of two radionuclide ejection-fraction techniques with contrast angiography in ischemic heart disease and valvular heart disease |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A08%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20two%20radionuclide%20ejection-fraction%20techniques%20with%20contrast%20angiography%20in%20ischemic%20heart%20disease%20and%20valvular%20heart%20disease&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=HASSAN,%20I.%20M&rft.date=1986-04&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=474&rft.epage=477&rft.pages=474-477&rft.issn=0340-6997&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft.coden=EJNMD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00252792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E76950443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=76950443&rft_id=info:pmid/3015620&rfr_iscdi=true |