Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples

Apples were coated with different concentrations of Semperfresh™ just after harvest to determine the effect of this coating on the shelf-life and quality criteria of apples. Treated apples showed a delay in the change of firmness, titrateable acidity, vitamin C content, soluble solid content and wei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food science & technology 1995, Vol.28 (5), p.501-505
Hauptverfasser: SÜMNÜ, G, BAYINDIRH, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 505
container_issue 5
container_start_page 501
container_title Food science & technology
container_volume 28
creator SÜMNÜ, G
BAYINDIRH, L
description Apples were coated with different concentrations of Semperfresh™ just after harvest to determine the effect of this coating on the shelf-life and quality criteria of apples. Treated apples showed a delay in the change of firmness, titrateable acidity, vitamin C content, soluble solid content and weight loss compared to untreated ones. Apples obtained from cold storage (0–1°C and 90% RH) were coated with three commercial coatings; Semperfresh™ (10 g/L), Fomesa™ and Jonfresh™ to compare the efficiency of these coatings on quality criteria and poststorage-life of apples. All of the coatings were effective in reducing the rate of weight, ascorbic acid, colour and firmness change and in increasing post storage life. There was not much quality difference in coated fruits for different kinds of coatings.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/fstl.1995.0084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_fstl_1995_0084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0023643885700849</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0023643885700849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e05ce94c4435efa180c34bb9f9cef3b500f486462622be913815c7ea3802f1b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFavnnPwmjj7md1jKa0KBRH0vGy2s7KSJmE3FfrvTah4cy4zMO87M88Qck-hogDqMeSxragxsgLQ4oIsKBhVUsrqS7IAYLxUgutrcpPzF0whmF4QuQkB_ZiLPhTr3o2x-5zqrtimYxyLt6Nr43iam6uDyydXrIahxXxLroJrM9795iX52G7e18_l7vXpZb3alZ6JeiwRpEcjvBBcYnBUg-eiaUwwHgNvJEAQWgnFFGMNGso1lb5GxzWwQBvJl6Q6z_WpzzlhsEOKB5dOloKdoe0MbWdoO0NPhoezYXDZuzYk1_mY_1xcGWVqOsn0WYbT8d8Rk80-YudxH9P0Dbvv438bfgB8GGl_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>SÜMNÜ, G ; BAYINDIRH, L</creator><creatorcontrib>SÜMNÜ, G ; BAYINDIRH, L</creatorcontrib><description>Apples were coated with different concentrations of Semperfresh™ just after harvest to determine the effect of this coating on the shelf-life and quality criteria of apples. Treated apples showed a delay in the change of firmness, titrateable acidity, vitamin C content, soluble solid content and weight loss compared to untreated ones. Apples obtained from cold storage (0–1°C and 90% RH) were coated with three commercial coatings; Semperfresh™ (10 g/L), Fomesa™ and Jonfresh™ to compare the efficiency of these coatings on quality criteria and poststorage-life of apples. All of the coatings were effective in reducing the rate of weight, ascorbic acid, colour and firmness change and in increasing post storage life. There was not much quality difference in coated fruits for different kinds of coatings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-6438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1127</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/fstl.1995.0084</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LBWTAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Fruit and vegetable industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><ispartof>Food science &amp; technology, 1995, Vol.28 (5), p.501-505</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e05ce94c4435efa180c34bb9f9cef3b500f486462622be913815c7ea3802f1b53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643885700849$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3696971$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SÜMNÜ, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAYINDIRH, L</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples</title><title>Food science &amp; technology</title><description>Apples were coated with different concentrations of Semperfresh™ just after harvest to determine the effect of this coating on the shelf-life and quality criteria of apples. Treated apples showed a delay in the change of firmness, titrateable acidity, vitamin C content, soluble solid content and weight loss compared to untreated ones. Apples obtained from cold storage (0–1°C and 90% RH) were coated with three commercial coatings; Semperfresh™ (10 g/L), Fomesa™ and Jonfresh™ to compare the efficiency of these coatings on quality criteria and poststorage-life of apples. All of the coatings were effective in reducing the rate of weight, ascorbic acid, colour and firmness change and in increasing post storage life. There was not much quality difference in coated fruits for different kinds of coatings.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fruit and vegetable industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><issn>0023-6438</issn><issn>1096-1127</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFavnnPwmjj7md1jKa0KBRH0vGy2s7KSJmE3FfrvTah4cy4zMO87M88Qck-hogDqMeSxragxsgLQ4oIsKBhVUsrqS7IAYLxUgutrcpPzF0whmF4QuQkB_ZiLPhTr3o2x-5zqrtimYxyLt6Nr43iam6uDyydXrIahxXxLroJrM9795iX52G7e18_l7vXpZb3alZ6JeiwRpEcjvBBcYnBUg-eiaUwwHgNvJEAQWgnFFGMNGso1lb5GxzWwQBvJl6Q6z_WpzzlhsEOKB5dOloKdoe0MbWdoO0NPhoezYXDZuzYk1_mY_1xcGWVqOsn0WYbT8d8Rk80-YudxH9P0Dbvv438bfgB8GGl_</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>SÜMNÜ, G</creator><creator>BAYINDIRH, L</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples</title><author>SÜMNÜ, G ; BAYINDIRH, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e05ce94c4435efa180c34bb9f9cef3b500f486462622be913815c7ea3802f1b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fruit and vegetable industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SÜMNÜ, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAYINDIRH, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Food science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SÜMNÜ, G</au><au>BAYINDIRH, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples</atitle><jtitle>Food science &amp; technology</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>501-505</pages><issn>0023-6438</issn><eissn>1096-1127</eissn><coden>LBWTAP</coden><abstract>Apples were coated with different concentrations of Semperfresh™ just after harvest to determine the effect of this coating on the shelf-life and quality criteria of apples. Treated apples showed a delay in the change of firmness, titrateable acidity, vitamin C content, soluble solid content and weight loss compared to untreated ones. Apples obtained from cold storage (0–1°C and 90% RH) were coated with three commercial coatings; Semperfresh™ (10 g/L), Fomesa™ and Jonfresh™ to compare the efficiency of these coatings on quality criteria and poststorage-life of apples. All of the coatings were effective in reducing the rate of weight, ascorbic acid, colour and firmness change and in increasing post storage life. There was not much quality difference in coated fruits for different kinds of coatings.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/fstl.1995.0084</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-6438
ispartof Food science & technology, 1995, Vol.28 (5), p.501-505
issn 0023-6438
1096-1127
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_fstl_1995_0084
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Fruit and vegetable industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
title Effects of Coatings on Fruit Quality of Amasya Apples
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A01%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Coatings%20on%20Fruit%20Quality%20of%20Amasya%20Apples&rft.jtitle=Food%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=S%C3%9CMN%C3%9C,%20G&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=501-505&rft.issn=0023-6438&rft.eissn=1096-1127&rft.coden=LBWTAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/fstl.1995.0084&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0023643885700849%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0023643885700849&rfr_iscdi=true