Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply

The phenotypic plasticity of axial root anatomy was investigated in response to the availability of above- and below-ground resources using eight grass species of the genera Bromus and Poa. In a 7-week garden experiment nutrients were varied by a factor of five and light treatments of 100, 30 and 5·...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of botany 2001-12, Vol.88 (6), p.1071-1078
Hauptverfasser: Wahl, Stefan, Ryser, Peter, Edwards, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1078
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1071
container_title Annals of botany
container_volume 88
creator Wahl, Stefan
Ryser, Peter
Edwards, Peter J.
description The phenotypic plasticity of axial root anatomy was investigated in response to the availability of above- and below-ground resources using eight grass species of the genera Bromus and Poa. In a 7-week garden experiment nutrients were varied by a factor of five and light treatments of 100, 30 and 5·5% daylight were applied. Both nutrients and light influenced root structure. The effect of nutrients was largely explained by plant size, but this was not the case for light. Shading to 30% daylight led to a higher proportion of stele, larger stelar cells and larger xylem vessels. This can be understood either as an increased need for high transport capacity in the shade, where leaf area is larger but root mass lower than in full daylight, or as an increased resistance against desiccation, which is more of a hazard in open sites. Under 5·5% daylight, tissue mass density was reduced due to a lower proportion of stele, though xylem characteristics were not influenced when a correction for the effect of root cross-sectional area was applied. This response may be interpreted as a mechanism to maintain root function with a lower investment in biomass when growth is limited by low irradiance. The results show that the response of a plant to resource limitation is not restricted to those organs responsible for the acquisition of that resource. Furthermore, the qualitative response to shading depends on the absolute level of irradiance. For this reason, care is needed when comparing the results of shading experiments conducted under different irradiances.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/anbo.2001.1551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_anbo_2001_1551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42772221</jstor_id><els_id>S0305736401915513</els_id><sourcerecordid>42772221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-45431b6b69263ef8b0c34d7603651a8ba9d726a82c93537a1bdebb98cf48f5b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWKtbd0JeYGp-JpnMUoq2QtFSFcSFIclkNFqTIUnFeXs7VLpzdRffdy73HgDOMZpghPil8jpMCEJ4ghnDB2CEUc0KQWp0CEaIIlZUlJfH4CSlD4QQ4TUegdflu_Uh950zcLlWKTvjcg9DC2dRpQRXIWR45VUOXz10Hq5s6oJPFuYAF-7tPcNbn61PA6R8A-82OTrrM3zYdN26PwVHrVone_Y3x-Dp5vpxOi8W97Pb6dWiMKXAuShZSbHmmteEU9sKjQwtm4ojyhlWQqu6qQhXgpiaMloprBurdS1MW4qWaUHHYLLba2JIKdpWdtF9qdhLjORgRw525GBHDna2wMUO-Eg5xH27JFVFCBnyYpe7lO3PPlfxU_KKVkzOn18km86fV5whWW77Yte32y-_nY0yma0HYxsXrcmyCe6_U34BTgeFAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wahl, Stefan ; Ryser, Peter ; Edwards, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wahl, Stefan ; Ryser, Peter ; Edwards, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>The phenotypic plasticity of axial root anatomy was investigated in response to the availability of above- and below-ground resources using eight grass species of the genera Bromus and Poa. In a 7-week garden experiment nutrients were varied by a factor of five and light treatments of 100, 30 and 5·5% daylight were applied. Both nutrients and light influenced root structure. The effect of nutrients was largely explained by plant size, but this was not the case for light. Shading to 30% daylight led to a higher proportion of stele, larger stelar cells and larger xylem vessels. This can be understood either as an increased need for high transport capacity in the shade, where leaf area is larger but root mass lower than in full daylight, or as an increased resistance against desiccation, which is more of a hazard in open sites. Under 5·5% daylight, tissue mass density was reduced due to a lower proportion of stele, though xylem characteristics were not influenced when a correction for the effect of root cross-sectional area was applied. This response may be interpreted as a mechanism to maintain root function with a lower investment in biomass when growth is limited by low irradiance. The results show that the response of a plant to resource limitation is not restricted to those organs responsible for the acquisition of that resource. Furthermore, the qualitative response to shading depends on the absolute level of irradiance. For this reason, care is needed when comparing the results of shading experiments conducted under different irradiances.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-7364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbo.2001.1551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Bromus ; Bromus, hydraulic conductivity, light, nutrients, phenotypic plasticity, Poa, Poaceae, root anatomy, stele ; Cell walls ; hydraulic conductivity ; light ; nutrients ; Phenotypic plasticity ; Plant anatomy ; Plant nutrition ; Plant roots ; Plant tissues ; Plants ; Poa ; Poaceae ; root anatomy ; Root stele ; stele ; Xylem ; Xylem vessels</subject><ispartof>Annals of botany, 2001-12, Vol.88 (6), p.1071-1078</ispartof><rights>2001 Annals of Botany Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-45431b6b69263ef8b0c34d7603651a8ba9d726a82c93537a1bdebb98cf48f5b83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42772221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42772221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wahl, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply</title><title>Annals of botany</title><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><description>The phenotypic plasticity of axial root anatomy was investigated in response to the availability of above- and below-ground resources using eight grass species of the genera Bromus and Poa. In a 7-week garden experiment nutrients were varied by a factor of five and light treatments of 100, 30 and 5·5% daylight were applied. Both nutrients and light influenced root structure. The effect of nutrients was largely explained by plant size, but this was not the case for light. Shading to 30% daylight led to a higher proportion of stele, larger stelar cells and larger xylem vessels. This can be understood either as an increased need for high transport capacity in the shade, where leaf area is larger but root mass lower than in full daylight, or as an increased resistance against desiccation, which is more of a hazard in open sites. Under 5·5% daylight, tissue mass density was reduced due to a lower proportion of stele, though xylem characteristics were not influenced when a correction for the effect of root cross-sectional area was applied. This response may be interpreted as a mechanism to maintain root function with a lower investment in biomass when growth is limited by low irradiance. The results show that the response of a plant to resource limitation is not restricted to those organs responsible for the acquisition of that resource. Furthermore, the qualitative response to shading depends on the absolute level of irradiance. For this reason, care is needed when comparing the results of shading experiments conducted under different irradiances.</description><subject>Bromus</subject><subject>Bromus, hydraulic conductivity, light, nutrients, phenotypic plasticity, Poa, Poaceae, root anatomy, stele</subject><subject>Cell walls</subject><subject>hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>light</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>Phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Plant anatomy</subject><subject>Plant nutrition</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Poa</subject><subject>Poaceae</subject><subject>root anatomy</subject><subject>Root stele</subject><subject>stele</subject><subject>Xylem</subject><subject>Xylem vessels</subject><issn>0305-7364</issn><issn>1095-8290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEURoMoWKtbd0JeYGp-JpnMUoq2QtFSFcSFIclkNFqTIUnFeXs7VLpzdRffdy73HgDOMZpghPil8jpMCEJ4ghnDB2CEUc0KQWp0CEaIIlZUlJfH4CSlD4QQ4TUegdflu_Uh950zcLlWKTvjcg9DC2dRpQRXIWR45VUOXz10Hq5s6oJPFuYAF-7tPcNbn61PA6R8A-82OTrrM3zYdN26PwVHrVone_Y3x-Dp5vpxOi8W97Pb6dWiMKXAuShZSbHmmteEU9sKjQwtm4ojyhlWQqu6qQhXgpiaMloprBurdS1MW4qWaUHHYLLba2JIKdpWdtF9qdhLjORgRw525GBHDna2wMUO-Eg5xH27JFVFCBnyYpe7lO3PPlfxU_KKVkzOn18km86fV5whWW77Yte32y-_nY0yma0HYxsXrcmyCe6_U34BTgeFAg</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Wahl, Stefan</creator><creator>Ryser, Peter</creator><creator>Edwards, Peter J.</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply</title><author>Wahl, Stefan ; Ryser, Peter ; Edwards, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-45431b6b69263ef8b0c34d7603651a8ba9d726a82c93537a1bdebb98cf48f5b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Bromus</topic><topic>Bromus, hydraulic conductivity, light, nutrients, phenotypic plasticity, Poa, Poaceae, root anatomy, stele</topic><topic>Cell walls</topic><topic>hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>light</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>Phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Plant anatomy</topic><topic>Plant nutrition</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Poa</topic><topic>Poaceae</topic><topic>root anatomy</topic><topic>Root stele</topic><topic>stele</topic><topic>Xylem</topic><topic>Xylem vessels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wahl, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryser, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wahl, Stefan</au><au>Ryser, Peter</au><au>Edwards, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply</atitle><jtitle>Annals of botany</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Bot</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1071</spage><epage>1078</epage><pages>1071-1078</pages><issn>0305-7364</issn><eissn>1095-8290</eissn><abstract>The phenotypic plasticity of axial root anatomy was investigated in response to the availability of above- and below-ground resources using eight grass species of the genera Bromus and Poa. In a 7-week garden experiment nutrients were varied by a factor of five and light treatments of 100, 30 and 5·5% daylight were applied. Both nutrients and light influenced root structure. The effect of nutrients was largely explained by plant size, but this was not the case for light. Shading to 30% daylight led to a higher proportion of stele, larger stelar cells and larger xylem vessels. This can be understood either as an increased need for high transport capacity in the shade, where leaf area is larger but root mass lower than in full daylight, or as an increased resistance against desiccation, which is more of a hazard in open sites. Under 5·5% daylight, tissue mass density was reduced due to a lower proportion of stele, though xylem characteristics were not influenced when a correction for the effect of root cross-sectional area was applied. This response may be interpreted as a mechanism to maintain root function with a lower investment in biomass when growth is limited by low irradiance. The results show that the response of a plant to resource limitation is not restricted to those organs responsible for the acquisition of that resource. Furthermore, the qualitative response to shading depends on the absolute level of irradiance. For this reason, care is needed when comparing the results of shading experiments conducted under different irradiances.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/anbo.2001.1551</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-7364
ispartof Annals of botany, 2001-12, Vol.88 (6), p.1071-1078
issn 0305-7364
1095-8290
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_anbo_2001_1551
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bromus
Bromus, hydraulic conductivity, light, nutrients, phenotypic plasticity, Poa, Poaceae, root anatomy, stele
Cell walls
hydraulic conductivity
light
nutrients
Phenotypic plasticity
Plant anatomy
Plant nutrition
Plant roots
Plant tissues
Plants
Poa
Poaceae
root anatomy
Root stele
stele
Xylem
Xylem vessels
title Phenotypic Plasticity of Grass Root Anatomy in Response to Light Intensity and Nutrient Supply
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T17%3A06%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenotypic%20Plasticity%20of%20Grass%20Root%20Anatomy%20in%20Response%20to%20Light%20Intensity%20and%20Nutrient%20Supply&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20botany&rft.au=Wahl,%20Stefan&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1071&rft.epage=1078&rft.pages=1071-1078&rft.issn=0305-7364&rft.eissn=1095-8290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbo.2001.1551&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E42772221%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42772221&rft_els_id=S0305736401915513&rfr_iscdi=true