A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves

With approximately 100 million shots fired at mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) annually, it is incumbent on managers to determine whether changes in ammunition will substantially alter harvest metrics or hunter satisfaction. We compared mourning dove harvest metrics for 1 lead (Pb 7½, 32 g) and 2 s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wildlife Society bulletin 2015-03, Vol.39 (1), p.103-115
Hauptverfasser: Pierce, Brian L., Roster, Thomas A., Frisbie, Michael C., Mason, Corey D., Roberson, Jay A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 115
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Wildlife Society bulletin
container_volume 39
creator Pierce, Brian L.
Roster, Thomas A.
Frisbie, Michael C.
Mason, Corey D.
Roberson, Jay A.
description With approximately 100 million shots fired at mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) annually, it is incumbent on managers to determine whether changes in ammunition will substantially alter harvest metrics or hunter satisfaction. We compared mourning dove harvest metrics for 1 lead (Pb 7½, 32 g) and 2 steel (Fe 7 and Fe 6, 28 g) 12-gauge ammunition types using a double-blind field test in central Texas, USA. There were no differences in the number of attempts, or number of shots fired among ammunition types. Hunters were unable to distinguish the ammunition type being used in the field, and we detected no relationship between ammunition type and level of hunter satisfaction. Field analyses detected no difference in doves bagged per shot, wounded per shot, bagged per hit, or wounded per hit among the 3 ammunition types. Necropsy analyses detected no difference in the proportion of birds with through-body strikes, mean penetration depth of through-body strikes, or mean embedded pellet depth among ammunition types. Ammunition and choke combinations that produced higher pattern densities yielded more hits per shot and produced more total strikes per bird, resulting in a higher percentage of birds with embedded pellets, more embedded pellets per bird, and a higher proportion of birds with broken legs. All 3 ammunition types retained sufficient lethality to harvest mourning doves under typical hunting conditions. Our results demonstrate that when the ammunition type used provides sufficient lethality for pellets to penetrate vital organs, pattern density becomes the primary factor influencing ammunition performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wsb.504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>wildsocibull2011.39.1.103</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>wildsocibull2011.39.1.103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-fe7bd88370a43a10bd77f9d60c59b52692f7245617ca7d791f7db4b21653024d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OAjEURhujiYjGV-jOhRlsp-2UWQKR0Uhw4Q_LpjNtZbBMSTuIvL0lY4gbV_fLzTk3-S4A1xgNMELp3S6UA4boCejhnAwTRjNy-iefg4sQVgihDGHeA8UIVm69kb4OroHOQKulgrJRMLRaWxiWroXWSRWgcR4upf_Soa2bD7h2W98cgnJxdQnOjLRBX_3OPnib3r9OHpLZc_E4Gc2SinBME6N5qYZDwpGkRGJUKs5NrjJUsbxkaZanhqeUZZhXkiueY8NVScsUZ4yglCrSBzfd3cq7ELw2YuPrtfR7gZE49Bexv4j9I3nbkbva6v1_mFi8jDt60NGr0Dp_pKOrgqvqcmttijAWJBc4HiBRSDqhjo_6PgrSf4qME87EYl4I_vQ-ZsWcCEp-AIZDehs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Pierce, Brian L. ; Roster, Thomas A. ; Frisbie, Michael C. ; Mason, Corey D. ; Roberson, Jay A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Brian L. ; Roster, Thomas A. ; Frisbie, Michael C. ; Mason, Corey D. ; Roberson, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><description>With approximately 100 million shots fired at mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) annually, it is incumbent on managers to determine whether changes in ammunition will substantially alter harvest metrics or hunter satisfaction. We compared mourning dove harvest metrics for 1 lead (Pb 7½, 32 g) and 2 steel (Fe 7 and Fe 6, 28 g) 12-gauge ammunition types using a double-blind field test in central Texas, USA. There were no differences in the number of attempts, or number of shots fired among ammunition types. Hunters were unable to distinguish the ammunition type being used in the field, and we detected no relationship between ammunition type and level of hunter satisfaction. Field analyses detected no difference in doves bagged per shot, wounded per shot, bagged per hit, or wounded per hit among the 3 ammunition types. Necropsy analyses detected no difference in the proportion of birds with through-body strikes, mean penetration depth of through-body strikes, or mean embedded pellet depth among ammunition types. Ammunition and choke combinations that produced higher pattern densities yielded more hits per shot and produced more total strikes per bird, resulting in a higher percentage of birds with embedded pellets, more embedded pellets per bird, and a higher proportion of birds with broken legs. All 3 ammunition types retained sufficient lethality to harvest mourning doves under typical hunting conditions. Our results demonstrate that when the ammunition type used provides sufficient lethality for pellets to penetrate vital organs, pattern density becomes the primary factor influencing ammunition performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ammunition ; Birds ; Doves ; Fowling ; Hunting ; Lead ; lethality research ; mourning dove ; nontoxic ; Original Article ; shotgun ; shotshell ; Steels ; Texas ; toxic shot ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management ; wounding ; Zenaida macroura</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2015-03, Vol.39 (1), p.103-115</ispartof><rights>2015 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2014 The Authors. published by The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-fe7bd88370a43a10bd77f9d60c59b52692f7245617ca7d791f7db4b21653024d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-fe7bd88370a43a10bd77f9d60c59b52692f7245617ca7d791f7db4b21653024d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/wildsocibull2011.39.1.103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.39.1.103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roster, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbie, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Corey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberson, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><description>With approximately 100 million shots fired at mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) annually, it is incumbent on managers to determine whether changes in ammunition will substantially alter harvest metrics or hunter satisfaction. We compared mourning dove harvest metrics for 1 lead (Pb 7½, 32 g) and 2 steel (Fe 7 and Fe 6, 28 g) 12-gauge ammunition types using a double-blind field test in central Texas, USA. There were no differences in the number of attempts, or number of shots fired among ammunition types. Hunters were unable to distinguish the ammunition type being used in the field, and we detected no relationship between ammunition type and level of hunter satisfaction. Field analyses detected no difference in doves bagged per shot, wounded per shot, bagged per hit, or wounded per hit among the 3 ammunition types. Necropsy analyses detected no difference in the proportion of birds with through-body strikes, mean penetration depth of through-body strikes, or mean embedded pellet depth among ammunition types. Ammunition and choke combinations that produced higher pattern densities yielded more hits per shot and produced more total strikes per bird, resulting in a higher percentage of birds with embedded pellets, more embedded pellets per bird, and a higher proportion of birds with broken legs. All 3 ammunition types retained sufficient lethality to harvest mourning doves under typical hunting conditions. Our results demonstrate that when the ammunition type used provides sufficient lethality for pellets to penetrate vital organs, pattern density becomes the primary factor influencing ammunition performance.</description><subject>Ammunition</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Doves</subject><subject>Fowling</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>lethality research</subject><subject>mourning dove</subject><subject>nontoxic</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>shotgun</subject><subject>shotshell</subject><subject>Steels</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>toxic shot</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>wounding</subject><subject>Zenaida macroura</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OAjEURhujiYjGV-jOhRlsp-2UWQKR0Uhw4Q_LpjNtZbBMSTuIvL0lY4gbV_fLzTk3-S4A1xgNMELp3S6UA4boCejhnAwTRjNy-iefg4sQVgihDGHeA8UIVm69kb4OroHOQKulgrJRMLRaWxiWroXWSRWgcR4upf_Soa2bD7h2W98cgnJxdQnOjLRBX_3OPnib3r9OHpLZc_E4Gc2SinBME6N5qYZDwpGkRGJUKs5NrjJUsbxkaZanhqeUZZhXkiueY8NVScsUZ4yglCrSBzfd3cq7ELw2YuPrtfR7gZE49Bexv4j9I3nbkbva6v1_mFi8jDt60NGr0Dp_pKOrgqvqcmttijAWJBc4HiBRSDqhjo_6PgrSf4qME87EYl4I_vQ-ZsWcCEp-AIZDehs</recordid><startdate>201503</startdate><enddate>201503</enddate><creator>Pierce, Brian L.</creator><creator>Roster, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Frisbie, Michael C.</creator><creator>Mason, Corey D.</creator><creator>Roberson, Jay A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201503</creationdate><title>A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves</title><author>Pierce, Brian L. ; Roster, Thomas A. ; Frisbie, Michael C. ; Mason, Corey D. ; Roberson, Jay A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-fe7bd88370a43a10bd77f9d60c59b52692f7245617ca7d791f7db4b21653024d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ammunition</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Doves</topic><topic>Fowling</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>lethality research</topic><topic>mourning dove</topic><topic>nontoxic</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>shotgun</topic><topic>shotshell</topic><topic>Steels</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>toxic shot</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>wounding</topic><topic>Zenaida macroura</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Brian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roster, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbie, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Corey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberson, Jay A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pierce, Brian L.</au><au>Roster, Thomas A.</au><au>Frisbie, Michael C.</au><au>Mason, Corey D.</au><au>Roberson, Jay A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><date>2015-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>115</epage><pages>103-115</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>With approximately 100 million shots fired at mourning doves (Zenaida macroura) annually, it is incumbent on managers to determine whether changes in ammunition will substantially alter harvest metrics or hunter satisfaction. We compared mourning dove harvest metrics for 1 lead (Pb 7½, 32 g) and 2 steel (Fe 7 and Fe 6, 28 g) 12-gauge ammunition types using a double-blind field test in central Texas, USA. There were no differences in the number of attempts, or number of shots fired among ammunition types. Hunters were unable to distinguish the ammunition type being used in the field, and we detected no relationship between ammunition type and level of hunter satisfaction. Field analyses detected no difference in doves bagged per shot, wounded per shot, bagged per hit, or wounded per hit among the 3 ammunition types. Necropsy analyses detected no difference in the proportion of birds with through-body strikes, mean penetration depth of through-body strikes, or mean embedded pellet depth among ammunition types. Ammunition and choke combinations that produced higher pattern densities yielded more hits per shot and produced more total strikes per bird, resulting in a higher percentage of birds with embedded pellets, more embedded pellets per bird, and a higher proportion of birds with broken legs. All 3 ammunition types retained sufficient lethality to harvest mourning doves under typical hunting conditions. Our results demonstrate that when the ammunition type used provides sufficient lethality for pellets to penetrate vital organs, pattern density becomes the primary factor influencing ammunition performance.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.504</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-5463
ispartof Wildlife Society bulletin, 2015-03, Vol.39 (1), p.103-115
issn 1938-5463
1938-5463
2328-5540
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_504
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Ammunition
Birds
Doves
Fowling
Hunting
Lead
lethality research
mourning dove
nontoxic
Original Article
shotgun
shotshell
Steels
Texas
toxic shot
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
wounding
Zenaida macroura
title A comparison of lead and steel shot loads for harvesting mourning doves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A07%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20lead%20and%20steel%20shot%20loads%20for%20harvesting%20mourning%20doves&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Pierce,%20Brian%20L.&rft.date=2015-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=115&rft.pages=103-115&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.504&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Ewildsocibull2011.39.1.103%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=wildsocibull2011.39.1.103&rfr_iscdi=true