Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan
In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 26 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Linden, Daniel W. Campa III, Henry Roloff, Gary J. Beyer Jr, Dean E. Millenbah, Kelly F. |
description | In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wsb.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>wildsocibull2011.35.1.20</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>wildsocibull2011.35.1.20</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz01PwkAQBuCN0URE_sNejKfibKfdLkclAkbQgx8QL5vd7RYWa0u6JcC_twSDHjy9c3hmMi8hHQZdBhDebLzu4glpsR6KII44nv6Zz8mF90sA4MCSFuGTMrW5K-Z0obSrVU1XZW2L2qmcZmVF-6pQqaL5rthSV9CJMws3V8UlOctU7m3nJ9vkbXD_2h8F4-fhQ_92HBgMexiEPEqUUCxJIx2C4BEzNoxMhiZTap-gBcZojAbGuGAIqdCQYcYg4XFssU2uDndNVXpf2UyuKvelqp1kIPdlZVNWYuOuD27jcrv7H8npy91eBge59HVZHWWzl_rSOL3O87B5RmIsmQzh1ztf2-3Rq-pT8gSTWE6fhlLMRoPZ4_tMfuA3pU5ybA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><description>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (<0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R
2= 0.4,P< 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Canada lynx ; Coniferous forests ; Ecoregions ; Forest habitats ; Forest service ; geographic information system ; habitat ; Habitat conservation ; Hares ; landscape model ; Lepus americanus ; Lynx ; Lynx canadensis ; Michigan ; Original Article ; snowshoe hare ; Vegetation ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26</ispartof><rights>2011 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright © The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/wildsocibull2011.35.1.20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.35.1.20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campa III, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><addtitle>Wildlife Society Bulletin</addtitle><description>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (<0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R
2= 0.4,P< 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</description><subject>Canada lynx</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>geographic information system</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Hares</subject><subject>landscape model</subject><subject>Lepus americanus</subject><subject>Lynx</subject><subject>Lynx canadensis</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>snowshoe hare</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptz01PwkAQBuCN0URE_sNejKfibKfdLkclAkbQgx8QL5vd7RYWa0u6JcC_twSDHjy9c3hmMi8hHQZdBhDebLzu4glpsR6KII44nv6Zz8mF90sA4MCSFuGTMrW5K-Z0obSrVU1XZW2L2qmcZmVF-6pQqaL5rthSV9CJMws3V8UlOctU7m3nJ9vkbXD_2h8F4-fhQ_92HBgMexiEPEqUUCxJIx2C4BEzNoxMhiZTap-gBcZojAbGuGAIqdCQYcYg4XFssU2uDndNVXpf2UyuKvelqp1kIPdlZVNWYuOuD27jcrv7H8npy91eBge59HVZHWWzl_rSOL3O87B5RmIsmQzh1ztf2-3Rq-pT8gSTWE6fhlLMRoPZ4_tMfuA3pU5ybA</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Linden, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Campa III, Henry</creator><creator>Roloff, Gary J.</creator><creator>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creator><creator>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><author>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Canada lynx</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>geographic information system</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Hares</topic><topic>landscape model</topic><topic>Lepus americanus</topic><topic>Lynx</topic><topic>Lynx canadensis</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>snowshoe hare</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campa III, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linden, Daniel W.</au><au>Campa III, Henry</au><au>Roloff, Gary J.</au><au>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</au><au>Millenbah, Kelly F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Wildlife Society Bulletin</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>20-26</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (<0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R
2= 0.4,P< 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1938-5463 |
ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26 |
issn | 1938-5463 2328-5540 1938-5463 2328-5540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_3 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Canada lynx Coniferous forests Ecoregions Forest habitats Forest service geographic information system habitat Habitat conservation Hares landscape model Lepus americanus Lynx Lynx canadensis Michigan Original Article snowshoe hare Vegetation Wildlife habitats Wildlife management |
title | Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20habitat%20potential%20for%20Canada%20lynx%20in%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Linden,%20Daniel%20W.&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=20-26&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Ewildsocibull2011.35.1.20%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=wildsocibull2011.35.1.20&rfr_iscdi=true |