Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan

In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wildlife Society bulletin 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26
Hauptverfasser: Linden, Daniel W., Campa III, Henry, Roloff, Gary J., Beyer Jr, Dean E., Millenbah, Kelly F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Wildlife Society bulletin
container_volume 35
creator Linden, Daniel W.
Campa III, Henry
Roloff, Gary J.
Beyer Jr, Dean E.
Millenbah, Kelly F.
description In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wsb.3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_3</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>wildsocibull2011.35.1.20</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>wildsocibull2011.35.1.20</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptz01PwkAQBuCN0URE_sNejKfibKfdLkclAkbQgx8QL5vd7RYWa0u6JcC_twSDHjy9c3hmMi8hHQZdBhDebLzu4glpsR6KII44nv6Zz8mF90sA4MCSFuGTMrW5K-Z0obSrVU1XZW2L2qmcZmVF-6pQqaL5rthSV9CJMws3V8UlOctU7m3nJ9vkbXD_2h8F4-fhQ_92HBgMexiEPEqUUCxJIx2C4BEzNoxMhiZTap-gBcZojAbGuGAIqdCQYcYg4XFssU2uDndNVXpf2UyuKvelqp1kIPdlZVNWYuOuD27jcrv7H8npy91eBge59HVZHWWzl_rSOL3O87B5RmIsmQzh1ztf2-3Rq-pT8gSTWE6fhlLMRoPZ4_tMfuA3pU5ybA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><description>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (&lt;0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R 2= 0.4,P&lt; 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Canada lynx ; Coniferous forests ; Ecoregions ; Forest habitats ; Forest service ; geographic information system ; habitat ; Habitat conservation ; Hares ; landscape model ; Lepus americanus ; Lynx ; Lynx canadensis ; Michigan ; Original Article ; snowshoe hare ; Vegetation ; Wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26</ispartof><rights>2011 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright © The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/wildsocibull2011.35.1.20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.35.1.20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campa III, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><addtitle>Wildlife Society Bulletin</addtitle><description>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (&lt;0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R 2= 0.4,P&lt; 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</description><subject>Canada lynx</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>geographic information system</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Hares</subject><subject>landscape model</subject><subject>Lepus americanus</subject><subject>Lynx</subject><subject>Lynx canadensis</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>snowshoe hare</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptz01PwkAQBuCN0URE_sNejKfibKfdLkclAkbQgx8QL5vd7RYWa0u6JcC_twSDHjy9c3hmMi8hHQZdBhDebLzu4glpsR6KII44nv6Zz8mF90sA4MCSFuGTMrW5K-Z0obSrVU1XZW2L2qmcZmVF-6pQqaL5rthSV9CJMws3V8UlOctU7m3nJ9vkbXD_2h8F4-fhQ_92HBgMexiEPEqUUCxJIx2C4BEzNoxMhiZTap-gBcZojAbGuGAIqdCQYcYg4XFssU2uDndNVXpf2UyuKvelqp1kIPdlZVNWYuOuD27jcrv7H8npy91eBge59HVZHWWzl_rSOL3O87B5RmIsmQzh1ztf2-3Rq-pT8gSTWE6fhlLMRoPZ4_tMfuA3pU5ybA</recordid><startdate>201103</startdate><enddate>201103</enddate><creator>Linden, Daniel W.</creator><creator>Campa III, Henry</creator><creator>Roloff, Gary J.</creator><creator>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creator><creator>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201103</creationdate><title>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</title><author>Linden, Daniel W. ; Campa III, Henry ; Roloff, Gary J. ; Beyer Jr, Dean E. ; Millenbah, Kelly F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3293-2647a8a17d4b208641ce24cf3cfaa4cf30b8353ccb01168130d8b0f3f107655e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Canada lynx</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>geographic information system</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Hares</topic><topic>landscape model</topic><topic>Lepus americanus</topic><topic>Lynx</topic><topic>Lynx canadensis</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>snowshoe hare</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linden, Daniel W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campa III, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roloff, Gary J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millenbah, Kelly F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linden, Daniel W.</au><au>Campa III, Henry</au><au>Roloff, Gary J.</au><au>Beyer Jr, Dean E.</au><au>Millenbah, Kelly F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Wildlife Society Bulletin</addtitle><date>2011-03</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>20-26</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>In the ruling to list Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) as a federally threatened species, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified the Great Lakes region as an area that historically contained lynx and, hence, could potentially contribute to population recovery.More recent critical habitat designations by the USFWS only recognize Minnesota, USA as important to recovery in the Great Lakes. Although there is no current evidence of a resident lynx population in the Upper Peninsula (UP) of Michigan, USA, trapping and track records over the past century suggest the region was periodically invaded after lynx population irruptions in Canada. In support of state and federal agency efforts in Michigan to provide and conserve lynx habitat, we quantified habitat potential using a spatially explicit, landscape-level model based on relationships among lynx, their primary prey, snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), and vegetation attributes. Outputs from the model indicated that habitat in the UP supports low hare densities (&lt;0.07–0.75 hares/ha). Corresponding potential lynx densities ranged from 0/100 km2in the southern and northeast UP to 5/100 km2in the central–eastern UP. Model estimates of potential hare density were correlated with winter track-surveys (R 2= 0.4,P&lt; 0.001). Current absence of a resident lynx population in Michigan is likely attributed to confounding factors (e.g., habitat, competition, status of source population) but our results indicate that current habitat quality, quantity, and spatial configuration are exerting large-scale negative influences. These results are generally consistent with the USFWS determination that Michigan’s UP most likely functions as dispersal habitat.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-5463
ispartof Wildlife Society bulletin, 2011-03, Vol.35 (1), p.20-26
issn 1938-5463
2328-5540
1938-5463
2328-5540
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_3
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Canada lynx
Coniferous forests
Ecoregions
Forest habitats
Forest service
geographic information system
habitat
Habitat conservation
Hares
landscape model
Lepus americanus
Lynx
Lynx canadensis
Michigan
Original Article
snowshoe hare
Vegetation
Wildlife habitats
Wildlife management
title Modeling habitat potential for Canada lynx in Michigan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20habitat%20potential%20for%20Canada%20lynx%20in%20Michigan&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Linden,%20Daniel%20W.&rft.date=2011-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=20-26&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Ewildsocibull2011.35.1.20%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=wildsocibull2011.35.1.20&rfr_iscdi=true