Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is an ecologically important species in forests of North America. Effective management of forests requires accurate, precise estimates of deer population abundance to plan and justify management actions. Spotlight surveys in combination with distance sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wildlife Society bulletin (2011) 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.97-108
Hauptverfasser: PRESTON, TODD M., WILDHABER, MARK L., GREEN, NICHOLAS S., ALBERS, JANICE L., DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108
container_issue 1
container_start_page 97
container_title Wildlife Society bulletin (2011)
container_volume 45
creator PRESTON, TODD M.
WILDHABER, MARK L.
GREEN, NICHOLAS S.
ALBERS, JANICE L.
DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.
description The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is an ecologically important species in forests of North America. Effective management of forests requires accurate, precise estimates of deer population abundance to plan and justify management actions. Spotlight surveys in combination with distance sampling are a common method of estimating deer population abundance; however, spotlight surveys are known to have serious drawbacks such as high costs and sampling biases. Therefore, we tested the effectiveness of enumerating deer from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flights, conducted 1 and 6 March 2018, to develop population and density estimates in 2 United States National Parks: Harpers Ferry National Historic Park (HAFE) and Monocacy National Battlefield (MONO). Concurrent spotlight surveys at MONO enabled us to compare estimates obtained by the 2 methods. Deer density estimates by 4 observers of UAV-obtained thermal imagery from HAFE were 94.5 ± 3.9 deer/km². Concurrent UAV and spotlight surveys at MONO found 19.7 ± 0.5 deer/km² and 6.4 ± 4.9 deer/km², respectively; suggesting that spotlight surveys may significantly underestimate deer densities. Despite the logistical challenges to UAV operation, our findings demonstrate that UAVs will become an invaluable tool for wildlife management as technology improves.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wsb.1149
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27014855</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27014855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2879-6d45a7dd1087be939560bb1d6975738d9ca4d8c4d4cb26f89d8d4105012ce21f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOObAf0Do0UtnvjRpEvAy5_wBAw-u7hjSJHUZXSdJZey_t6VDvHh6P14ePnhehK4BTwFjcneI5RSAyjM0IhkRKWMUn_-5L9Ekxi3GGCgICWSE7hfN984F3frmM1lvfOvSlfa1s8mjcyEpYt8XzU43TdfNXPC6Tj7cxpvaxSt0Uek6uskpx6h4WqzmL-ny7fl1Plumhggu09xSprm1gAUvncwky3FZgs0lZzwTVhpNrTDUUlOSvBLSCksBMwzEOAJVNka3w18T9jEGV6mv4Hc6HBVg1YurTlz14h2aDuihkzj-y6n1-8OJvxn4bWz34ZcnvJtIMJb9ANXSYes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>PRESTON, TODD M. ; WILDHABER, MARK L. ; GREEN, NICHOLAS S. ; ALBERS, JANICE L. ; DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</creator><creatorcontrib>PRESTON, TODD M. ; WILDHABER, MARK L. ; GREEN, NICHOLAS S. ; ALBERS, JANICE L. ; DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</creatorcontrib><description>The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is an ecologically important species in forests of North America. Effective management of forests requires accurate, precise estimates of deer population abundance to plan and justify management actions. Spotlight surveys in combination with distance sampling are a common method of estimating deer population abundance; however, spotlight surveys are known to have serious drawbacks such as high costs and sampling biases. Therefore, we tested the effectiveness of enumerating deer from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flights, conducted 1 and 6 March 2018, to develop population and density estimates in 2 United States National Parks: Harpers Ferry National Historic Park (HAFE) and Monocacy National Battlefield (MONO). Concurrent spotlight surveys at MONO enabled us to compare estimates obtained by the 2 methods. Deer density estimates by 4 observers of UAV-obtained thermal imagery from HAFE were 94.5 ± 3.9 deer/km². Concurrent UAV and spotlight surveys at MONO found 19.7 ± 0.5 deer/km² and 6.4 ± 4.9 deer/km², respectively; suggesting that spotlight surveys may significantly underestimate deer densities. Despite the logistical challenges to UAV operation, our findings demonstrate that UAVs will become an invaluable tool for wildlife management as technology improves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><subject>density estimate ; distance sampling ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Original Article ; population estimate ; spotlight survey ; thermal imaging ; UAV ; white‐tailed deer</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin (2011), 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.97-108</ispartof><rights>2021 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2021 The Wildlife Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2879-6d45a7dd1087be939560bb1d6975738d9ca4d8c4d4cb26f89d8d4105012ce21f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2879-6d45a7dd1087be939560bb1d6975738d9ca4d8c4d4cb26f89d8d4105012ce21f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27014855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27014855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PRESTON, TODD M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILDHABER, MARK L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREEN, NICHOLAS S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBERS, JANICE L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</creatorcontrib><title>Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin (2011)</title><description>The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is an ecologically important species in forests of North America. Effective management of forests requires accurate, precise estimates of deer population abundance to plan and justify management actions. Spotlight surveys in combination with distance sampling are a common method of estimating deer population abundance; however, spotlight surveys are known to have serious drawbacks such as high costs and sampling biases. Therefore, we tested the effectiveness of enumerating deer from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flights, conducted 1 and 6 March 2018, to develop population and density estimates in 2 United States National Parks: Harpers Ferry National Historic Park (HAFE) and Monocacy National Battlefield (MONO). Concurrent spotlight surveys at MONO enabled us to compare estimates obtained by the 2 methods. Deer density estimates by 4 observers of UAV-obtained thermal imagery from HAFE were 94.5 ± 3.9 deer/km². Concurrent UAV and spotlight surveys at MONO found 19.7 ± 0.5 deer/km² and 6.4 ± 4.9 deer/km², respectively; suggesting that spotlight surveys may significantly underestimate deer densities. Despite the logistical challenges to UAV operation, our findings demonstrate that UAVs will become an invaluable tool for wildlife management as technology improves.</description><subject>density estimate</subject><subject>distance sampling</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>population estimate</subject><subject>spotlight survey</subject><subject>thermal imaging</subject><subject>UAV</subject><subject>white‐tailed deer</subject><issn>2328-5540</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOObAf0Do0UtnvjRpEvAy5_wBAw-u7hjSJHUZXSdJZey_t6VDvHh6P14ePnhehK4BTwFjcneI5RSAyjM0IhkRKWMUn_-5L9Ekxi3GGCgICWSE7hfN984F3frmM1lvfOvSlfa1s8mjcyEpYt8XzU43TdfNXPC6Tj7cxpvaxSt0Uek6uskpx6h4WqzmL-ny7fl1Plumhggu09xSprm1gAUvncwky3FZgs0lZzwTVhpNrTDUUlOSvBLSCksBMwzEOAJVNka3w18T9jEGV6mv4Hc6HBVg1YurTlz14h2aDuihkzj-y6n1-8OJvxn4bWz34ZcnvJtIMJb9ANXSYes</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>PRESTON, TODD M.</creator><creator>WILDHABER, MARK L.</creator><creator>GREEN, NICHOLAS S.</creator><creator>ALBERS, JANICE L.</creator><creator>DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</title><author>PRESTON, TODD M. ; WILDHABER, MARK L. ; GREEN, NICHOLAS S. ; ALBERS, JANICE L. ; DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2879-6d45a7dd1087be939560bb1d6975738d9ca4d8c4d4cb26f89d8d4105012ce21f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>density estimate</topic><topic>distance sampling</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>population estimate</topic><topic>spotlight survey</topic><topic>thermal imaging</topic><topic>UAV</topic><topic>white‐tailed deer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PRESTON, TODD M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILDHABER, MARK L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GREEN, NICHOLAS S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALBERS, JANICE L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin (2011)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PRESTON, TODD M.</au><au>WILDHABER, MARK L.</au><au>GREEN, NICHOLAS S.</au><au>ALBERS, JANICE L.</au><au>DEBENEDETTO, GEOFFREY P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin (2011)</jtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>97-108</pages><issn>2328-5540</issn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is an ecologically important species in forests of North America. Effective management of forests requires accurate, precise estimates of deer population abundance to plan and justify management actions. Spotlight surveys in combination with distance sampling are a common method of estimating deer population abundance; however, spotlight surveys are known to have serious drawbacks such as high costs and sampling biases. Therefore, we tested the effectiveness of enumerating deer from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flights, conducted 1 and 6 March 2018, to develop population and density estimates in 2 United States National Parks: Harpers Ferry National Historic Park (HAFE) and Monocacy National Battlefield (MONO). Concurrent spotlight surveys at MONO enabled us to compare estimates obtained by the 2 methods. Deer density estimates by 4 observers of UAV-obtained thermal imagery from HAFE were 94.5 ± 3.9 deer/km². Concurrent UAV and spotlight surveys at MONO found 19.7 ± 0.5 deer/km² and 6.4 ± 4.9 deer/km², respectively; suggesting that spotlight surveys may significantly underestimate deer densities. Despite the logistical challenges to UAV operation, our findings demonstrate that UAVs will become an invaluable tool for wildlife management as technology improves.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.1149</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2328-5540
ispartof Wildlife Society bulletin (2011), 2021-03, Vol.45 (1), p.97-108
issn 2328-5540
2328-5540
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1149
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects density estimate
distance sampling
Odocoileus virginianus
Original Article
population estimate
spotlight survey
thermal imaging
UAV
white‐tailed deer
title Enumerating White-Tailed Deer Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enumerating%20White-Tailed%20Deer%20Using%20Unmanned%20Aerial%20Vehicles&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin%20(2011)&rft.au=PRESTON,%20TODD%20M.&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=97-108&rft.issn=2328-5540&rft.eissn=2328-5540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.1149&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E27014855%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27014855&rfr_iscdi=true