Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms
We examined efficacy of a mustard extraction technique for quantifying earthworm occupancy and density using a mesocosm experiment. In May 2017, we placed 12 earthworms from 2 ecological groups (6 surface dwelling [epigeic] and 6 deep dwelling [anecic]) into mesocosms (0.144 m² surface area) constru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 2019-12, Vol.43 (4), p.760-765 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 765 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 760 |
container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | STARKING, MELISSA D. ROLOFF, GARY J. |
description | We examined efficacy of a mustard extraction technique for quantifying earthworm occupancy and density using a mesocosm experiment. In May 2017, we placed 12 earthworms from 2 ecological groups (6 surface dwelling [epigeic] and 6 deep dwelling [anecic]) into mesocosms (0.144 m² surface area) constructed from soils typically found in northern hardwood forests of Michigan, USA. We evaluated 2 soil depths (15 and 30 cm) and a soil moisture gradient (dry to wet). We found occupancy of epigeic earthworms was accurately portrayed 92% of the time through leaf searches, and subsequent mustard phase did not improve accuracy. For anecic earthworms, we found that occupancy was accurately portrayed 50% of the time through leaf searches and mustard phase increased accuracy to 92%. We found that mustard extraction produced 0–83% (median = 50%) of epigeic earthworms available for capture, with most recovered through leaf searches (median = 42%). We found that mustard extraction produced 0–67% (median = 33%) of anecic earthworms available for capture, with most (median = 20%) recovered during the mustard phase. Our results lend support for using mustard extraction as a technique for quantifying occupancy of epigeic and anecic earthworms, but caution that density estimates are likely low. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wsb.1033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26877170</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_6cc394a4baf947af8afc64baa97bc2a0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>26877170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-533cef6b9781890298f8c9597ebc6fb01067faac7c5583b902abebd8ed5cf0683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiQRJ_AMme_Sy2m53t-0RCSoJxgMYj82028KShWK7iPx7i0u4eZjMm8mXN5OH0C3BDwTj7HEfVBSUXqBeRjOeFkWOL1GPCBp1XtJrNAhhhTEmOeGCZD00HH9Ds4O23iwSSN52oQVfJeOf1oNua7dJ5kYvN_XXziTW-WQG621zZMfg2-Xe-XW4QVcWmmAGp95HH8_j-eg1nb6_TEbDaappQWkaSxtbKsF4PI0zwS3XohDMKF1ahQkumQXQTBcFpyoSoIyquKkKbXHJaR9NOt_KwUpufb0Gf5AOavm3cH4h40-1bowstaYih1yBFTkDy8HqMk4gmNIZ4Oh133lp70Lwxp79CJbHJGVMUh6TjGjaofu6MYd_Ofk5ezrxdx2_Cq3zZz4rOWOEYfoLbFl-yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>STARKING, MELISSA D. ; ROLOFF, GARY J.</creator><creatorcontrib>STARKING, MELISSA D. ; ROLOFF, GARY J.</creatorcontrib><description>We examined efficacy of a mustard extraction technique for quantifying earthworm occupancy and density using a mesocosm experiment. In May 2017, we placed 12 earthworms from 2 ecological groups (6 surface dwelling [epigeic] and 6 deep dwelling [anecic]) into mesocosms (0.144 m² surface area) constructed from soils typically found in northern hardwood forests of Michigan, USA. We evaluated 2 soil depths (15 and 30 cm) and a soil moisture gradient (dry to wet). We found occupancy of epigeic earthworms was accurately portrayed 92% of the time through leaf searches, and subsequent mustard phase did not improve accuracy. For anecic earthworms, we found that occupancy was accurately portrayed 50% of the time through leaf searches and mustard phase increased accuracy to 92%. We found that mustard extraction produced 0–83% (median = 50%) of epigeic earthworms available for capture, with most recovered through leaf searches (median = 42%). We found that mustard extraction produced 0–67% (median = 33%) of anecic earthworms available for capture, with most (median = 20%) recovered during the mustard phase. Our results lend support for using mustard extraction as a technique for quantifying occupancy of epigeic and anecic earthworms, but caution that density estimates are likely low.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><subject>earthworms ; Michigan ; mustard extraction ; northern hardwoods ; Tools and Technology</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2019-12, Vol.43 (4), p.760-765</ispartof><rights>2019 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-533cef6b9781890298f8c9597ebc6fb01067faac7c5583b902abebd8ed5cf0683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-533cef6b9781890298f8c9597ebc6fb01067faac7c5583b902abebd8ed5cf0683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26877170$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26877170$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>STARKING, MELISSA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROLOFF, GARY J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><description>We examined efficacy of a mustard extraction technique for quantifying earthworm occupancy and density using a mesocosm experiment. In May 2017, we placed 12 earthworms from 2 ecological groups (6 surface dwelling [epigeic] and 6 deep dwelling [anecic]) into mesocosms (0.144 m² surface area) constructed from soils typically found in northern hardwood forests of Michigan, USA. We evaluated 2 soil depths (15 and 30 cm) and a soil moisture gradient (dry to wet). We found occupancy of epigeic earthworms was accurately portrayed 92% of the time through leaf searches, and subsequent mustard phase did not improve accuracy. For anecic earthworms, we found that occupancy was accurately portrayed 50% of the time through leaf searches and mustard phase increased accuracy to 92%. We found that mustard extraction produced 0–83% (median = 50%) of epigeic earthworms available for capture, with most recovered through leaf searches (median = 42%). We found that mustard extraction produced 0–67% (median = 33%) of anecic earthworms available for capture, with most (median = 20%) recovered during the mustard phase. Our results lend support for using mustard extraction as a technique for quantifying occupancy of epigeic and anecic earthworms, but caution that density estimates are likely low.</description><subject>earthworms</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>mustard extraction</subject><subject>northern hardwoods</subject><subject>Tools and Technology</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPAjEQhRujiQRJ_AMme_Sy2m53t-0RCSoJxgMYj82028KShWK7iPx7i0u4eZjMm8mXN5OH0C3BDwTj7HEfVBSUXqBeRjOeFkWOL1GPCBp1XtJrNAhhhTEmOeGCZD00HH9Ds4O23iwSSN52oQVfJeOf1oNua7dJ5kYvN_XXziTW-WQG621zZMfg2-Xe-XW4QVcWmmAGp95HH8_j-eg1nb6_TEbDaappQWkaSxtbKsF4PI0zwS3XohDMKF1ahQkumQXQTBcFpyoSoIyquKkKbXHJaR9NOt_KwUpufb0Gf5AOavm3cH4h40-1bowstaYih1yBFTkDy8HqMk4gmNIZ4Oh133lp70Lwxp79CJbHJGVMUh6TjGjaofu6MYd_Ofk5ezrxdx2_Cq3zZz4rOWOEYfoLbFl-yg</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>STARKING, MELISSA D.</creator><creator>ROLOFF, GARY J.</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms</title><author>STARKING, MELISSA D. ; ROLOFF, GARY J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-533cef6b9781890298f8c9597ebc6fb01067faac7c5583b902abebd8ed5cf0683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>earthworms</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>mustard extraction</topic><topic>northern hardwoods</topic><topic>Tools and Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STARKING, MELISSA D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROLOFF, GARY J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STARKING, MELISSA D.</au><au>ROLOFF, GARY J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>760</spage><epage>765</epage><pages>760-765</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><abstract>We examined efficacy of a mustard extraction technique for quantifying earthworm occupancy and density using a mesocosm experiment. In May 2017, we placed 12 earthworms from 2 ecological groups (6 surface dwelling [epigeic] and 6 deep dwelling [anecic]) into mesocosms (0.144 m² surface area) constructed from soils typically found in northern hardwood forests of Michigan, USA. We evaluated 2 soil depths (15 and 30 cm) and a soil moisture gradient (dry to wet). We found occupancy of epigeic earthworms was accurately portrayed 92% of the time through leaf searches, and subsequent mustard phase did not improve accuracy. For anecic earthworms, we found that occupancy was accurately portrayed 50% of the time through leaf searches and mustard phase increased accuracy to 92%. We found that mustard extraction produced 0–83% (median = 50%) of epigeic earthworms available for capture, with most recovered through leaf searches (median = 42%). We found that mustard extraction produced 0–67% (median = 33%) of anecic earthworms available for capture, with most (median = 20%) recovered during the mustard phase. Our results lend support for using mustard extraction as a technique for quantifying occupancy of epigeic and anecic earthworms, but caution that density estimates are likely low.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.1033</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1938-5463 |
ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 2019-12, Vol.43 (4), p.760-765 |
issn | 1938-5463 2328-5540 1938-5463 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_wsb_1033 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | earthworms Michigan mustard extraction northern hardwoods Tools and Technology |
title | Evaluating a Mustard Extraction Technique for Sampling Earthworms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A29%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20a%20Mustard%20Extraction%20Technique%20for%20Sampling%20Earthworms&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=STARKING,%20MELISSA%20D.&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=760&rft.epage=765&rft.pages=760-765&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=2328-5540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.1033&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E26877170%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26877170&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_6cc394a4baf947af8afc64baa97bc2a0&rfr_iscdi=true |