Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests

The bacterial bioluminescence assay is widely used to estimate chemical cytotoxicity. This assay is performed most often by using luminescent bacteria Vibrio fisheri NRRL‐B‐11177 (earlier cited as Photobacterium phosphoreum NRRL‐B‐11177) as a test organism. In this work we have used cloned gram(+) a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and water quality 1995-05, Vol.10 (2), p.157-166
Hauptverfasser: Lampinen, Jorma, Virta, Marko, Karp, Matti
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157
container_title Environmental toxicology and water quality
container_volume 10
creator Lampinen, Jorma
Virta, Marko
Karp, Matti
description The bacterial bioluminescence assay is widely used to estimate chemical cytotoxicity. This assay is performed most often by using luminescent bacteria Vibrio fisheri NRRL‐B‐11177 (earlier cited as Photobacterium phosphoreum NRRL‐B‐11177) as a test organism. In this work we have used cloned gram(+) and gram(‐) bacterial strains for the evaluation of chemical toxicity. Two types of luciferase genes were used as reporter genes, one of which was ATP‐dependent eukaryotic luciferase from Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and the other was FMN‐dependent bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi. These cloned strains were used to evaluate the effects of differences in cell wall structures in the bioluminescence cytotoxicity test using small molecular weight toxic chemicals as model compounds. The strains were found to have remarkably similar behavior and sensitivity toward test toxicants regardless of rather different kinds of membrane structure. However, the eukaryotic luciferase was found in every aspect more useful in toxicity tests than bacterial luciferase mainly because of increased sensitivity and ease of operation. The general behavior of the light emission is described and several aspects affecting the usefulness of the strains are discussed. © by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tox.2530100211
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tox_2530100211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_CNJ7KRNN_X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3651-d51a44b397109221903307123c026caec1da7ec50d1e4f482a800c8bc95dd4543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAMgCsEEmNw5ZwX6MhPs7ZHVMH4mTYJDbFblKXuCLRJlQS2PgjvS8cQiBMn25_8Wbaj6JzgEcGYXgS7HVHO8K4g5CAaEJxnMaV8fLjLOYuTlPLj6MT7F4xx1pNB9FHYppVOe2uQrdDayQa11uug3wFJU-6JgbX8IiupAjgta-SDk9p4pGproEQbHZ5RqasKHJiAQteC3w2s35TumfSA1mB6pg1aaVu_NbqvFBgFSHXB9strpUOHAvjgT6OjStYezr7jMHq8vloUN_F0PrktLqexYmNO4pITmSQrlqf9qZSSHDOGU0KZwnSsJChSyhQUxyWBpEoyKjOMVbZSOS_LhCdsGI32c5Wz3juoROt0I10nCBa7P4p-L_H71F7I98JG19D90y0W8-UfN9672gfY_rjSvYpxylIunmYTUczu0vuH2Uws2SeZAY6J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lampinen, Jorma ; Virta, Marko ; Karp, Matti</creator><creatorcontrib>Lampinen, Jorma ; Virta, Marko ; Karp, Matti</creatorcontrib><description>The bacterial bioluminescence assay is widely used to estimate chemical cytotoxicity. This assay is performed most often by using luminescent bacteria Vibrio fisheri NRRL‐B‐11177 (earlier cited as Photobacterium phosphoreum NRRL‐B‐11177) as a test organism. In this work we have used cloned gram(+) and gram(‐) bacterial strains for the evaluation of chemical toxicity. Two types of luciferase genes were used as reporter genes, one of which was ATP‐dependent eukaryotic luciferase from Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and the other was FMN‐dependent bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi. These cloned strains were used to evaluate the effects of differences in cell wall structures in the bioluminescence cytotoxicity test using small molecular weight toxic chemicals as model compounds. The strains were found to have remarkably similar behavior and sensitivity toward test toxicants regardless of rather different kinds of membrane structure. However, the eukaryotic luciferase was found in every aspect more useful in toxicity tests than bacterial luciferase mainly because of increased sensitivity and ease of operation. The general behavior of the light emission is described and several aspects affecting the usefulness of the strains are discussed. © by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tox.2530100211</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and water quality, 1995-05, Vol.10 (2), p.157-166</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3651-d51a44b397109221903307123c026caec1da7ec50d1e4f482a800c8bc95dd4543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3651-d51a44b397109221903307123c026caec1da7ec50d1e4f482a800c8bc95dd4543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftox.2530100211$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftox.2530100211$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lampinen, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virta, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Matti</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests</title><title>Environmental toxicology and water quality</title><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual</addtitle><description>The bacterial bioluminescence assay is widely used to estimate chemical cytotoxicity. This assay is performed most often by using luminescent bacteria Vibrio fisheri NRRL‐B‐11177 (earlier cited as Photobacterium phosphoreum NRRL‐B‐11177) as a test organism. In this work we have used cloned gram(+) and gram(‐) bacterial strains for the evaluation of chemical toxicity. Two types of luciferase genes were used as reporter genes, one of which was ATP‐dependent eukaryotic luciferase from Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and the other was FMN‐dependent bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi. These cloned strains were used to evaluate the effects of differences in cell wall structures in the bioluminescence cytotoxicity test using small molecular weight toxic chemicals as model compounds. The strains were found to have remarkably similar behavior and sensitivity toward test toxicants regardless of rather different kinds of membrane structure. However, the eukaryotic luciferase was found in every aspect more useful in toxicity tests than bacterial luciferase mainly because of increased sensitivity and ease of operation. The general behavior of the light emission is described and several aspects affecting the usefulness of the strains are discussed. © by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</description><issn>1053-4725</issn><issn>1098-2256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAMgCsEEmNw5ZwX6MhPs7ZHVMH4mTYJDbFblKXuCLRJlQS2PgjvS8cQiBMn25_8Wbaj6JzgEcGYXgS7HVHO8K4g5CAaEJxnMaV8fLjLOYuTlPLj6MT7F4xx1pNB9FHYppVOe2uQrdDayQa11uug3wFJU-6JgbX8IiupAjgta-SDk9p4pGproEQbHZ5RqasKHJiAQteC3w2s35TumfSA1mB6pg1aaVu_NbqvFBgFSHXB9strpUOHAvjgT6OjStYezr7jMHq8vloUN_F0PrktLqexYmNO4pITmSQrlqf9qZSSHDOGU0KZwnSsJChSyhQUxyWBpEoyKjOMVbZSOS_LhCdsGI32c5Wz3juoROt0I10nCBa7P4p-L_H71F7I98JG19D90y0W8-UfN9672gfY_rjSvYpxylIunmYTUczu0vuH2Uws2SeZAY6J</recordid><startdate>199505</startdate><enddate>199505</enddate><creator>Lampinen, Jorma</creator><creator>Virta, Marko</creator><creator>Karp, Matti</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199505</creationdate><title>Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests</title><author>Lampinen, Jorma ; Virta, Marko ; Karp, Matti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3651-d51a44b397109221903307123c026caec1da7ec50d1e4f482a800c8bc95dd4543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lampinen, Jorma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virta, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Matti</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and water quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lampinen, Jorma</au><au>Virta, Marko</au><au>Karp, Matti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and water quality</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual</addtitle><date>1995-05</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>157-166</pages><issn>1053-4725</issn><eissn>1098-2256</eissn><abstract>The bacterial bioluminescence assay is widely used to estimate chemical cytotoxicity. This assay is performed most often by using luminescent bacteria Vibrio fisheri NRRL‐B‐11177 (earlier cited as Photobacterium phosphoreum NRRL‐B‐11177) as a test organism. In this work we have used cloned gram(+) and gram(‐) bacterial strains for the evaluation of chemical toxicity. Two types of luciferase genes were used as reporter genes, one of which was ATP‐dependent eukaryotic luciferase from Pyrophorus plagiophthalamus and the other was FMN‐dependent bacterial luciferase from Vibrio harveyi. These cloned strains were used to evaluate the effects of differences in cell wall structures in the bioluminescence cytotoxicity test using small molecular weight toxic chemicals as model compounds. The strains were found to have remarkably similar behavior and sensitivity toward test toxicants regardless of rather different kinds of membrane structure. However, the eukaryotic luciferase was found in every aspect more useful in toxicity tests than bacterial luciferase mainly because of increased sensitivity and ease of operation. The general behavior of the light emission is described and several aspects affecting the usefulness of the strains are discussed. © by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/tox.2530100211</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-4725
ispartof Environmental toxicology and water quality, 1995-05, Vol.10 (2), p.157-166
issn 1053-4725
1098-2256
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tox_2530100211
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Comparison of gram positive and gram negative bacterial strains cloned with different types of luciferase genes in bioluminescence cytotoxicity tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A27%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20gram%20positive%20and%20gram%20negative%20bacterial%20strains%20cloned%20with%20different%20types%20of%20luciferase%20genes%20in%20bioluminescence%20cytotoxicity%20tests&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20water%20quality&rft.au=Lampinen,%20Jorma&rft.date=1995-05&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=157-166&rft.issn=1053-4725&rft.eissn=1098-2256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tox.2530100211&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_CNJ7KRNN_X%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true