The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests

Relative sensitivity and correlations between the Microtox® test and three commonly used acute lethality bioassays (i.e., rainbow trout, fathead minnow, Daphnia) are reviewed and discussed. All relevant data available for comparison were separated and evaluated based on chemical groupings. Generally...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental toxicology and water quality 1991-02, Vol.6 (1), p.35-62
Hauptverfasser: Munkittrick, K. R., Power, E. A., Sergy, G. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Environmental toxicology and water quality
container_volume 6
creator Munkittrick, K. R.
Power, E. A.
Sergy, G. A.
description Relative sensitivity and correlations between the Microtox® test and three commonly used acute lethality bioassays (i.e., rainbow trout, fathead minnow, Daphnia) are reviewed and discussed. All relevant data available for comparison were separated and evaluated based on chemical groupings. Generally, Microtox was more sensitive than or as sensitive as the acute lethality tests for pure individual organics, but was less sensitive to most inorganics. Microtox was not as sensitive as acute lethality tests to effluents or leachates with a high component of insecticides, herbicides, inorganics, pharmaceuticals or textiles, or highly lipophilic contaminants. As the complexity and toxicity of industrial effluents increased, the correlations and sensitivity of Microtox increased, with a corresponding decrease in data variability. Additionally, limitations of the available data are that (1) comparisons of relative sensitivity varied with the compounds and organisms tested; (2) there was a lack of standardization in approach and a failure to provide adequate details on the origin of the cited toxicity data, which confused and obscured comparisons; and (3) published reviews commonly failed to identify fish species and test details for cited data.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tox.2530060105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tox_2530060105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_M4HJB6JR_V</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-8bfbc8b705137c48c975addb752c53800ab600548249867a84e9a3bfaf6828763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZe0DNGUSxz9ZQgUtVQEJlZ-d5SSOYkgTZLu0vRSH4GS4KgKxYjVPM-97mhmETmMYxgDJme_Ww4QSAAYx0D3UiyETUZJQtr_VlEQpT-ghOnLuBQBE6PRQPa81trpR3rxr7HTrTFDGb3BX4YUpbBdiPz8GuFRvdWvKAbbKtHm3wt52Sz_Aqi1xpXytVRn8bRsmqlh6jRvta9Vsk7x23h2jg0o1Tp981z56uLqcjybR7G58PTqfRQXJYhqJvMoLkXOgMeFFKoqMU1WWOadJQYkAUDkDoKlI0kwwrkSqM0XySlVMJIIz0kfDXW5Y3TmrK_lmzULZjYxBbv8kw0Hy908ByHbAyjR6849bzu-e_7DRjjXO6_UPq-yrZJxwKp9ux_ImnUwv2PRePpIv7Yp9hA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Munkittrick, K. R. ; Power, E. A. ; Sergy, G. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munkittrick, K. R. ; Power, E. A. ; Sergy, G. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Relative sensitivity and correlations between the Microtox® test and three commonly used acute lethality bioassays (i.e., rainbow trout, fathead minnow, Daphnia) are reviewed and discussed. All relevant data available for comparison were separated and evaluated based on chemical groupings. Generally, Microtox was more sensitive than or as sensitive as the acute lethality tests for pure individual organics, but was less sensitive to most inorganics. Microtox was not as sensitive as acute lethality tests to effluents or leachates with a high component of insecticides, herbicides, inorganics, pharmaceuticals or textiles, or highly lipophilic contaminants. As the complexity and toxicity of industrial effluents increased, the correlations and sensitivity of Microtox increased, with a corresponding decrease in data variability. Additionally, limitations of the available data are that (1) comparisons of relative sensitivity varied with the compounds and organisms tested; (2) there was a lack of standardization in approach and a failure to provide adequate details on the origin of the cited toxicity data, which confused and obscured comparisons; and (3) published reviews commonly failed to identify fish species and test details for cited data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-4725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tox.2530060105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Environmental toxicology and water quality, 1991-02, Vol.6 (1), p.35-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1991 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-8bfbc8b705137c48c975addb752c53800ab600548249867a84e9a3bfaf6828763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-8bfbc8b705137c48c975addb752c53800ab600548249867a84e9a3bfaf6828763</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftox.2530060105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftox.2530060105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munkittrick, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergy, G. A.</creatorcontrib><title>The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests</title><title>Environmental toxicology and water quality</title><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual</addtitle><description>Relative sensitivity and correlations between the Microtox® test and three commonly used acute lethality bioassays (i.e., rainbow trout, fathead minnow, Daphnia) are reviewed and discussed. All relevant data available for comparison were separated and evaluated based on chemical groupings. Generally, Microtox was more sensitive than or as sensitive as the acute lethality tests for pure individual organics, but was less sensitive to most inorganics. Microtox was not as sensitive as acute lethality tests to effluents or leachates with a high component of insecticides, herbicides, inorganics, pharmaceuticals or textiles, or highly lipophilic contaminants. As the complexity and toxicity of industrial effluents increased, the correlations and sensitivity of Microtox increased, with a corresponding decrease in data variability. Additionally, limitations of the available data are that (1) comparisons of relative sensitivity varied with the compounds and organisms tested; (2) there was a lack of standardization in approach and a failure to provide adequate details on the origin of the cited toxicity data, which confused and obscured comparisons; and (3) published reviews commonly failed to identify fish species and test details for cited data.</description><issn>1053-4725</issn><issn>1098-2256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1OwzAQhS0EEqWwZe0DNGUSxz9ZQgUtVQEJlZ-d5SSOYkgTZLu0vRSH4GS4KgKxYjVPM-97mhmETmMYxgDJme_Ww4QSAAYx0D3UiyETUZJQtr_VlEQpT-ghOnLuBQBE6PRQPa81trpR3rxr7HTrTFDGb3BX4YUpbBdiPz8GuFRvdWvKAbbKtHm3wt52Sz_Aqi1xpXytVRn8bRsmqlh6jRvta9Vsk7x23h2jg0o1Tp981z56uLqcjybR7G58PTqfRQXJYhqJvMoLkXOgMeFFKoqMU1WWOadJQYkAUDkDoKlI0kwwrkSqM0XySlVMJIIz0kfDXW5Y3TmrK_lmzULZjYxBbv8kw0Hy908ByHbAyjR6849bzu-e_7DRjjXO6_UPq-yrZJxwKp9ux_ImnUwv2PRePpIv7Yp9hA</recordid><startdate>199102</startdate><enddate>199102</enddate><creator>Munkittrick, K. R.</creator><creator>Power, E. A.</creator><creator>Sergy, G. A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199102</creationdate><title>The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests</title><author>Munkittrick, K. R. ; Power, E. A. ; Sergy, G. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-8bfbc8b705137c48c975addb752c53800ab600548249867a84e9a3bfaf6828763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munkittrick, K. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergy, G. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and water quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munkittrick, K. R.</au><au>Power, E. A.</au><au>Sergy, G. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology and water quality</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual</addtitle><date>1991-02</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>35-62</pages><issn>1053-4725</issn><eissn>1098-2256</eissn><abstract>Relative sensitivity and correlations between the Microtox® test and three commonly used acute lethality bioassays (i.e., rainbow trout, fathead minnow, Daphnia) are reviewed and discussed. All relevant data available for comparison were separated and evaluated based on chemical groupings. Generally, Microtox was more sensitive than or as sensitive as the acute lethality tests for pure individual organics, but was less sensitive to most inorganics. Microtox was not as sensitive as acute lethality tests to effluents or leachates with a high component of insecticides, herbicides, inorganics, pharmaceuticals or textiles, or highly lipophilic contaminants. As the complexity and toxicity of industrial effluents increased, the correlations and sensitivity of Microtox increased, with a corresponding decrease in data variability. Additionally, limitations of the available data are that (1) comparisons of relative sensitivity varied with the compounds and organisms tested; (2) there was a lack of standardization in approach and a failure to provide adequate details on the origin of the cited toxicity data, which confused and obscured comparisons; and (3) published reviews commonly failed to identify fish species and test details for cited data.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/tox.2530060105</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-4725
ispartof Environmental toxicology and water quality, 1991-02, Vol.6 (1), p.35-62
issn 1053-4725
1098-2256
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tox_2530060105
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title The relative sensitivity of microtox®, daphnid, rainbow trout, and fathead minnow acute lethality tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relative%20sensitivity%20of%20microtox%C2%AE,%20daphnid,%20rainbow%20trout,%20and%20fathead%20minnow%20acute%20lethality%20tests&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology%20and%20water%20quality&rft.au=Munkittrick,%20K.%20R.&rft.date=1991-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=35-62&rft.issn=1053-4725&rft.eissn=1098-2256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tox.2530060105&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_M4HJB6JR_V%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true