Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa

The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taxon 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98
Hauptverfasser: Bouman, Roderick W., Keßler, Paul J.A., Telford, Ian R.H., Bruhl, Jeremy J., Strijk, Joeri S., Saunders, Richard M.K., Welzen, Peter C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 98
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Taxon
container_volume 70
creator Bouman, Roderick W.
Keßler, Paul J.A.
Telford, Ian R.H.
Bruhl, Jeremy J.
Strijk, Joeri S.
Saunders, Richard M.K.
Welzen, Peter C.
description The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/tax.12424
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tax_12424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>TAX12424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0GWdjHtzaOTjLtSfEFFFxXcDbeZO7aSTkoypfbfO7XiztWFw3c_DoexawFDASBHLX4NhdRSn7CeKIo8s8KMT1kPQEMGMpfn7CKlzw4VplA9Vj8HT27rMfLNcu_DBzXUrlzioeavXeCxaZfbxBM1acs9toHf_OXoCGlwy-dhh7FK3IUlRWpavg5NOOgOKt5Vwkt2VqNPdPV7--zt_m4-fcxmLw9P08ksc8qAziqrhCzIoa60lLY2YJQ1Vo0LJSoFNeXaVQu5ANQ4JqPJ5A6sJeNIViCE6rPB0etiSClSXW7iao1xXwooDwOVXZvyZ6COHR3Z3crT_n-wnE_ejx_fxttpVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><description>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tax.12424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>molecular phylogenetics ; paraphyly ; Phyllanthaceae ; Phyllanthus ; sections ; subgenera ; systematics</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. TAXON published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association for Plant Taxonomy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5072-431X ; 0000-0001-6569-4726 ; 0000-0002-2949-3318 ; 0000-0002-3570-0053 ; 0000-0003-1109-7015 ; 0000-0001-9112-4436 ; 0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftax.12424$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftax.12424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telford, Ian R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijk, Joeri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><title>Taxon</title><description>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</description><subject>molecular phylogenetics</subject><subject>paraphyly</subject><subject>Phyllanthaceae</subject><subject>Phyllanthus</subject><subject>sections</subject><subject>subgenera</subject><subject>systematics</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0GWdjHtzaOTjLtSfEFFFxXcDbeZO7aSTkoypfbfO7XiztWFw3c_DoexawFDASBHLX4NhdRSn7CeKIo8s8KMT1kPQEMGMpfn7CKlzw4VplA9Vj8HT27rMfLNcu_DBzXUrlzioeavXeCxaZfbxBM1acs9toHf_OXoCGlwy-dhh7FK3IUlRWpavg5NOOgOKt5Vwkt2VqNPdPV7--zt_m4-fcxmLw9P08ksc8qAziqrhCzIoa60lLY2YJQ1Vo0LJSoFNeXaVQu5ANQ4JqPJ5A6sJeNIViCE6rPB0etiSClSXW7iao1xXwooDwOVXZvyZ6COHR3Z3crT_n-wnE_ejx_fxttpVw</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Bouman, Roderick W.</creator><creator>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creator><creator>Telford, Ian R.H.</creator><creator>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creator><creator>Strijk, Joeri S.</creator><creator>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creator><creator>Welzen, Peter C.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-431X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-4726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-3318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-4436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><author>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>molecular phylogenetics</topic><topic>paraphyly</topic><topic>Phyllanthaceae</topic><topic>Phyllanthus</topic><topic>sections</topic><topic>subgenera</topic><topic>systematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telford, Ian R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijk, Joeri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouman, Roderick W.</au><au>Keßler, Paul J.A.</au><au>Telford, Ian R.H.</au><au>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</au><au>Strijk, Joeri S.</au><au>Saunders, Richard M.K.</au><au>Welzen, Peter C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>72-98</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tax.12424</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-431X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-4726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-3318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-4436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0262
ispartof Taxon, 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98
issn 0040-0262
1996-8175
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tax_12424
source Wiley Journals
subjects molecular phylogenetics
paraphyly
Phyllanthaceae
Phyllanthus
sections
subgenera
systematics
title Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20phylogenetics%20of%20Phyllanthus%20sensu%20lato%20(Phyllanthaceae):%20Towards%20coherent%20monophyletic%20taxa&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Bouman,%20Roderick%20W.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=72-98&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tax.12424&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ETAX12424%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true