Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa
The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taxon 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Taxon |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Bouman, Roderick W. Keßler, Paul J.A. Telford, Ian R.H. Bruhl, Jeremy J. Strijk, Joeri S. Saunders, Richard M.K. Welzen, Peter C. |
description | The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tax.12424 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tax_12424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>TAX12424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0GWdjHtzaOTjLtSfEFFFxXcDbeZO7aSTkoypfbfO7XiztWFw3c_DoexawFDASBHLX4NhdRSn7CeKIo8s8KMT1kPQEMGMpfn7CKlzw4VplA9Vj8HT27rMfLNcu_DBzXUrlzioeavXeCxaZfbxBM1acs9toHf_OXoCGlwy-dhh7FK3IUlRWpavg5NOOgOKt5Vwkt2VqNPdPV7--zt_m4-fcxmLw9P08ksc8qAziqrhCzIoa60lLY2YJQ1Vo0LJSoFNeXaVQu5ANQ4JqPJ5A6sJeNIViCE6rPB0etiSClSXW7iao1xXwooDwOVXZvyZ6COHR3Z3crT_n-wnE_ejx_fxttpVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><description>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tax.12424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>molecular phylogenetics ; paraphyly ; Phyllanthaceae ; Phyllanthus ; sections ; subgenera ; systematics</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. TAXON published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association for Plant Taxonomy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5072-431X ; 0000-0001-6569-4726 ; 0000-0002-2949-3318 ; 0000-0002-3570-0053 ; 0000-0003-1109-7015 ; 0000-0001-9112-4436 ; 0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftax.12424$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftax.12424$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telford, Ian R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijk, Joeri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><title>Taxon</title><description>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</description><subject>molecular phylogenetics</subject><subject>paraphyly</subject><subject>Phyllanthaceae</subject><subject>Phyllanthus</subject><subject>sections</subject><subject>subgenera</subject><subject>systematics</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0GWdjHtzaOTjLtSfEFFFxXcDbeZO7aSTkoypfbfO7XiztWFw3c_DoexawFDASBHLX4NhdRSn7CeKIo8s8KMT1kPQEMGMpfn7CKlzw4VplA9Vj8HT27rMfLNcu_DBzXUrlzioeavXeCxaZfbxBM1acs9toHf_OXoCGlwy-dhh7FK3IUlRWpavg5NOOgOKt5Vwkt2VqNPdPV7--zt_m4-fcxmLw9P08ksc8qAziqrhCzIoa60lLY2YJQ1Vo0LJSoFNeXaVQu5ANQ4JqPJ5A6sJeNIViCE6rPB0etiSClSXW7iao1xXwooDwOVXZvyZ6COHR3Z3crT_n-wnE_ejx_fxttpVw</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Bouman, Roderick W.</creator><creator>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creator><creator>Telford, Ian R.H.</creator><creator>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creator><creator>Strijk, Joeri S.</creator><creator>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creator><creator>Welzen, Peter C.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-431X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-4726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-3318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-4436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</title><author>Bouman, Roderick W. ; Keßler, Paul J.A. ; Telford, Ian R.H. ; Bruhl, Jeremy J. ; Strijk, Joeri S. ; Saunders, Richard M.K. ; Welzen, Peter C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3704-d83129eca4d4228f707387835931d30fe64cdb2b0a4a5e74e76c088e7ce2d0113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>molecular phylogenetics</topic><topic>paraphyly</topic><topic>Phyllanthaceae</topic><topic>Phyllanthus</topic><topic>sections</topic><topic>subgenera</topic><topic>systematics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Roderick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keßler, Paul J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Telford, Ian R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strijk, Joeri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Richard M.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welzen, Peter C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouman, Roderick W.</au><au>Keßler, Paul J.A.</au><au>Telford, Ian R.H.</au><au>Bruhl, Jeremy J.</au><au>Strijk, Joeri S.</au><au>Saunders, Richard M.K.</au><au>Welzen, Peter C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>72-98</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>The genus Phyllanthus is paraphyletic as currently circumscribed, with the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon nested within it. A phylogeny based on nuclear (ITS, PHYC) and chloroplast (matK, accD‐psaI, trnS‐trnG) markers is presented, including 18/18 subgenera and 53/70 sections. Differences in habit, branching type, floral and fruit characters are discussed, and we find indications for shifts in pollination and dispersal strategies possibly underlying the convergent evolution of these characters in multiple clades. Several taxonomic issues were found in the subgeneric classification of Phyllanthus that will require new transfers and rank changes. Phyllanthus subg. Anesonemoides, subg. Conami, subg. Emblica, subg. Gomphidium, subg. Kirganelia and subg. Phyllanthus are polyphyletic, and several sections appear to be paraphyletic (e.g., P. sect. Anisonema, sect. Emblicastrum, sect. Pseudoactephila, sect. Swartziani, and sect. Xylophylla); P. subg. Phyllanthodendron is furthermore paraphyletic with the genus Glochidion nested within. To create a classification of tribe Phyllantheae that comprises exclusively monophyletic taxa, it is necessary to treat several clades at the same taxonomic rank as the genera Breynia, Glochidion and Synostemon. Since combining all genera would lead to one giant heterogeneous genus that is difficult to define, we recommend dividing Phyllanthus into several monophyletic genera, which have previously been recognized and often possess diagnostic (combinations of) morphological characters. This new classification is forthcoming.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/tax.12424</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-431X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-4726</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-3318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-0053</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1109-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-4436</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8104-7761</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-0262 |
ispartof | Taxon, 2021-02, Vol.70 (1), p.72-98 |
issn | 0040-0262 1996-8175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_tax_12424 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | molecular phylogenetics paraphyly Phyllanthaceae Phyllanthus sections subgenera systematics |
title | Molecular phylogenetics of Phyllanthus sensu lato (Phyllanthaceae): Towards coherent monophyletic taxa |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T19%3A49%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Molecular%20phylogenetics%20of%20Phyllanthus%20sensu%20lato%20(Phyllanthaceae):%20Towards%20coherent%20monophyletic%20taxa&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Bouman,%20Roderick%20W.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=72-98&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tax.12424&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ETAX12424%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |