Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders
SUMMARY For a successful software project, acceptable quality must be achieved within an acceptable cost, demonstrating business value to customers and satisfactorily meeting delivery timeliness. Testing serves as the most widely used approaches to determine that the intended functionalities are per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of software : evolution and process 2012-11, Vol.24 (7), p.783-801 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 801 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 783 |
container_title | Journal of software : evolution and process |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Li, Qi Yang, Ye Li, Mingshu Wang, Qing Boehm, Barry W. Hu, Chenyong |
description | SUMMARY
For a successful software project, acceptable quality must be achieved within an acceptable cost, demonstrating business value to customers and satisfactorily meeting delivery timeliness. Testing serves as the most widely used approaches to determine that the intended functionalities are performed correctly and achieve the desired level of services; however, it is also a labor‐intensive and expensive process during the whole software life cycle. Most current testing processes are often technique‐centered, rather than organized to maximize business value. In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in the software testing process; propose a multi‐objective feature prioritization strategy for testing planning and controlling, which aligns the internal testing process with value objectives coming from customers and markets. Our case study in a real‐life business project shows that this method allows reasoning about the software testing process in different dimensions: it helps to manage the testing process effectively and efficiently, provides information for continuous internal software process improvement, and increases customer satisfaction, which makes winners of all success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs) in the software testing process. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐Based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in software testing process. This figure illustrates the whole process of value‐based software testing method. This method helps test manager consider all the win‐conditions from success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs), such as Business Importance, Quality Risk, Testing Cost and Market Pressure, enact thetesting plan and adjust it during testing execution. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/smr.512 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_smr_512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SMR512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-5a611d32e2201c89defab88f56881493df86caf502f4c5bd3cf5558f061691353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCpZafIXsXMjUXCaZjDupWgtVoSp1F9JMomPnUpLUWp_eDCPuzCYh5zuHww_AKUZjjBC58LUbM0wOwICgNEuyVODDv3dGj8HI-w8UDyeIpWwA1rN649rPsnmDvrVhp5yBwfjQfcSCNt5fQmtU2MbCxpWtK0P5rULZNjC0sFZrA3dl0xjnYWuh3-quJdEd06qCPkTx3lZFBCfgyKrKm9HvPQQvtzfPk7tk_jidTa7miaa5IAlTHOOCEkMIwlrkhbFqJYRlXAic5rSwgmtlGSI21WxVUG0ZY8IijnmOKaNDcNbP1a713hkr4-K1cnuJkexikjEmGWOK8ryXu7Iy-_-YfLpf9DrpdemD-frTyq0lz2jG5PJhKhcUZeT6lcsl_QFvd3oQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Li, Qi ; Yang, Ye ; Li, Mingshu ; Wang, Qing ; Boehm, Barry W. ; Hu, Chenyong</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi ; Yang, Ye ; Li, Mingshu ; Wang, Qing ; Boehm, Barry W. ; Hu, Chenyong</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
For a successful software project, acceptable quality must be achieved within an acceptable cost, demonstrating business value to customers and satisfactorily meeting delivery timeliness. Testing serves as the most widely used approaches to determine that the intended functionalities are performed correctly and achieve the desired level of services; however, it is also a labor‐intensive and expensive process during the whole software life cycle. Most current testing processes are often technique‐centered, rather than organized to maximize business value. In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in the software testing process; propose a multi‐objective feature prioritization strategy for testing planning and controlling, which aligns the internal testing process with value objectives coming from customers and markets. Our case study in a real‐life business project shows that this method allows reasoning about the software testing process in different dimensions: it helps to manage the testing process effectively and efficiently, provides information for continuous internal software process improvement, and increases customer satisfaction, which makes winners of all success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs) in the software testing process. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐Based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in software testing process. This figure illustrates the whole process of value‐based software testing method. This method helps test manager consider all the win‐conditions from success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs), such as Business Importance, Quality Risk, Testing Cost and Market Pressure, enact thetesting plan and adjust it during testing execution. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2047-7473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2047-7481</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/smr.512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>business importance ; cost ; market ; quality risk ; software testing ; value-based</subject><ispartof>Journal of software : evolution and process, 2012-11, Vol.24 (7), p.783-801</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-5a611d32e2201c89defab88f56881493df86caf502f4c5bd3cf5558f061691353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-5a611d32e2201c89defab88f56881493df86caf502f4c5bd3cf5558f061691353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsmr.512$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsmr.512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Barry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chenyong</creatorcontrib><title>Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders</title><title>Journal of software : evolution and process</title><addtitle>J. Softw. Evol. and Proc</addtitle><description>SUMMARY
For a successful software project, acceptable quality must be achieved within an acceptable cost, demonstrating business value to customers and satisfactorily meeting delivery timeliness. Testing serves as the most widely used approaches to determine that the intended functionalities are performed correctly and achieve the desired level of services; however, it is also a labor‐intensive and expensive process during the whole software life cycle. Most current testing processes are often technique‐centered, rather than organized to maximize business value. In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in the software testing process; propose a multi‐objective feature prioritization strategy for testing planning and controlling, which aligns the internal testing process with value objectives coming from customers and markets. Our case study in a real‐life business project shows that this method allows reasoning about the software testing process in different dimensions: it helps to manage the testing process effectively and efficiently, provides information for continuous internal software process improvement, and increases customer satisfaction, which makes winners of all success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs) in the software testing process. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐Based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in software testing process. This figure illustrates the whole process of value‐based software testing method. This method helps test manager consider all the win‐conditions from success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs), such as Business Importance, Quality Risk, Testing Cost and Market Pressure, enact thetesting plan and adjust it during testing execution. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>business importance</subject><subject>cost</subject><subject>market</subject><subject>quality risk</subject><subject>software testing</subject><subject>value-based</subject><issn>2047-7473</issn><issn>2047-7481</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCpZafIXsXMjUXCaZjDupWgtVoSp1F9JMomPnUpLUWp_eDCPuzCYh5zuHww_AKUZjjBC58LUbM0wOwICgNEuyVODDv3dGj8HI-w8UDyeIpWwA1rN649rPsnmDvrVhp5yBwfjQfcSCNt5fQmtU2MbCxpWtK0P5rULZNjC0sFZrA3dl0xjnYWuh3-quJdEd06qCPkTx3lZFBCfgyKrKm9HvPQQvtzfPk7tk_jidTa7miaa5IAlTHOOCEkMIwlrkhbFqJYRlXAic5rSwgmtlGSI21WxVUG0ZY8IijnmOKaNDcNbP1a713hkr4-K1cnuJkexikjEmGWOK8ryXu7Iy-_-YfLpf9DrpdemD-frTyq0lz2jG5PJhKhcUZeT6lcsl_QFvd3oQ</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Li, Qi</creator><creator>Yang, Ye</creator><creator>Li, Mingshu</creator><creator>Wang, Qing</creator><creator>Boehm, Barry W.</creator><creator>Hu, Chenyong</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders</title><author>Li, Qi ; Yang, Ye ; Li, Mingshu ; Wang, Qing ; Boehm, Barry W. ; Hu, Chenyong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3982-5a611d32e2201c89defab88f56881493df86caf502f4c5bd3cf5558f061691353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>business importance</topic><topic>cost</topic><topic>market</topic><topic>quality risk</topic><topic>software testing</topic><topic>value-based</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Barry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Chenyong</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of software : evolution and process</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Qi</au><au>Yang, Ye</au><au>Li, Mingshu</au><au>Wang, Qing</au><au>Boehm, Barry W.</au><au>Hu, Chenyong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of software : evolution and process</jtitle><addtitle>J. Softw. Evol. and Proc</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>783-801</pages><issn>2047-7473</issn><eissn>2047-7481</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY
For a successful software project, acceptable quality must be achieved within an acceptable cost, demonstrating business value to customers and satisfactorily meeting delivery timeliness. Testing serves as the most widely used approaches to determine that the intended functionalities are performed correctly and achieve the desired level of services; however, it is also a labor‐intensive and expensive process during the whole software life cycle. Most current testing processes are often technique‐centered, rather than organized to maximize business value. In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in the software testing process; propose a multi‐objective feature prioritization strategy for testing planning and controlling, which aligns the internal testing process with value objectives coming from customers and markets. Our case study in a real‐life business project shows that this method allows reasoning about the software testing process in different dimensions: it helps to manage the testing process effectively and efficiently, provides information for continuous internal software process improvement, and increases customer satisfaction, which makes winners of all success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs) in the software testing process. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In this article, we extend and elaborate the ‘4+1’ theoretical lenses of Value‐Based Software Engineering (VBSE) framework in software testing process. This figure illustrates the whole process of value‐based software testing method. This method helps test manager consider all the win‐conditions from success‐critical stakeholders (SCSs), such as Business Importance, Quality Risk, Testing Cost and Market Pressure, enact thetesting plan and adjust it during testing execution. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/smr.512</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2047-7473 |
ispartof | Journal of software : evolution and process, 2012-11, Vol.24 (7), p.783-801 |
issn | 2047-7473 2047-7481 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_smr_512 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | business importance cost market quality risk software testing value-based |
title | Improving software testing process: feature prioritization to make winners of success-critical stakeholders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20software%20testing%20process:%20feature%20prioritization%20to%20make%20winners%20of%20success-critical%20stakeholders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20software%20:%20evolution%20and%20process&rft.au=Li,%20Qi&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=783-801&rft.issn=2047-7473&rft.eissn=2047-7481&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/smr.512&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ESMR512%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |