Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA

Thirteen states associated with the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group‐6 (SERA‐IEG‐6) agreed to share their soil test based P and K rate recommendations for nine major crops. The objectives were to compare fertilizer P and K rate recommendations, to look for opport...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.975-988
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Hailin, Antonangelo, Joao, Grove, John, Osmond, Deanna, Slaton, Nathan A., Alford, Shannon, Florence, Robert, Huluka, Gobena, Hardy, David Herring, Lessl, Jason, Maguire, Rory, Mylavarapu, Rao, Oldham, J. Larry, Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M., Provin, Tony, Sonon, Leticia, Sotomayor, David, Wang, Jim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 988
container_issue 4
container_start_page 975
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 85
creator Zhang, Hailin
Antonangelo, Joao
Grove, John
Osmond, Deanna
Slaton, Nathan A.
Alford, Shannon
Florence, Robert
Huluka, Gobena
Hardy, David Herring
Lessl, Jason
Maguire, Rory
Mylavarapu, Rao
Oldham, J. Larry
Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.
Provin, Tony
Sonon, Leticia
Sotomayor, David
Wang, Jim
description Thirteen states associated with the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group‐6 (SERA‐IEG‐6) agreed to share their soil test based P and K rate recommendations for nine major crops. The objectives were to compare fertilizer P and K rate recommendations, to look for opportunities to rationalize similar recommendations across state lines, and to examine challenges to the development of a cooperative regional approach to P and K recommendations. Mehlich‐3 (eight states), Mehlich‐1 (five states), or Lancaster (one state) extractions were the basis of plant available soil P (STP) and K (STK) assessment. Fertilizer recommendation philosophies (sufficiency, build and maintain, and/or hybrid) variation among the states might be the main reason behind such discrepancies. Although a few similarities in P and K rate recommendations were found, the different philosophies, numerical presentations, and extraction procedures drove important recommendation differences. Widespread adoption of the Mehlich‐3 extraction procedure has not reduced variation in fertilizer P and K rate recommendations among the states. Instead, for states using Mehlich 3, soil test critical concentrations ranged from 30 to 75 mg P kg–1 and 60 to 175 mg K kg–1 for corn (Zea mays L.) grain and warm‐season grass hay production. The adoption of uniform soil testing terminology, sample collection guidelines, extraction methods, and interpretations across common physiographic regions, soils, and state lines remains a challenge. Differences arise because of the different soil orders and properties, climate conditions, and resulting crop responses to added P and K fertilizers. Such differences in soil‐test‐based fertilizer P and K recommendations are state specific and highlight needs to examine the soil testing and recommendation process, make soil test results end‐user friendly, and, when appropriate, standardize fundamental information used in the soil testing guidelines. Core Ideas Soil test‐based P and K fertilizer recommendations vary widely across the southern U.S. states. Mehlich‐3 and Mehlich‐1 extractions were the basis of plant available soil P and K assessment. Differences in P and K rate recommendations exists even with a consistent set of extractants. Recommendations differences are attributed to philosophical and soil properties differences. More consistent P and K recommendations would enhance the creditability of soil testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/saj2.20280
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_saj2_20280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SAJ220280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-b4c5b2dfa0446c09ac32762075ecbbfcd81db8e41e610b872b359164ce86662f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1qwzAQRkVpoWnaTU-gdcHpSLZkexlCfwl0kaZbI8ljohDbQeNQsusResaepErSdRfDx8Cbj-ExditgIgDkPZm1nEiQBZyxkchSlYDW4pyNINUiUWWpLtkV0RpAqBJgxJoPE7wZfN9x33Hq_ebn63tAGmJYQ1jz7aqnOGFH3HRx7QdD5HctD2ZAHtD1bYtdfeyIiAs9ER9WGMt2MULHl4vpNbtozIbw5i_HbPn48D57TuZvTy-z6TxxKZSQ2MwpK-vGQJZpB6Vxqcy1hFyhs7ZxdSFqW2AmUAuwRS5tqkqhM4eF1lo26ZjdnXqPbwRsqm3wrQn7SkB1MFQdDFVHQxEWJ_jTb3D_D1ktpq_ydPMLqOhsVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Hailin ; Antonangelo, Joao ; Grove, John ; Osmond, Deanna ; Slaton, Nathan A. ; Alford, Shannon ; Florence, Robert ; Huluka, Gobena ; Hardy, David Herring ; Lessl, Jason ; Maguire, Rory ; Mylavarapu, Rao ; Oldham, J. Larry ; Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Provin, Tony ; Sonon, Leticia ; Sotomayor, David ; Wang, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hailin ; Antonangelo, Joao ; Grove, John ; Osmond, Deanna ; Slaton, Nathan A. ; Alford, Shannon ; Florence, Robert ; Huluka, Gobena ; Hardy, David Herring ; Lessl, Jason ; Maguire, Rory ; Mylavarapu, Rao ; Oldham, J. Larry ; Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Provin, Tony ; Sonon, Leticia ; Sotomayor, David ; Wang, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>Thirteen states associated with the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group‐6 (SERA‐IEG‐6) agreed to share their soil test based P and K rate recommendations for nine major crops. The objectives were to compare fertilizer P and K rate recommendations, to look for opportunities to rationalize similar recommendations across state lines, and to examine challenges to the development of a cooperative regional approach to P and K recommendations. Mehlich‐3 (eight states), Mehlich‐1 (five states), or Lancaster (one state) extractions were the basis of plant available soil P (STP) and K (STK) assessment. Fertilizer recommendation philosophies (sufficiency, build and maintain, and/or hybrid) variation among the states might be the main reason behind such discrepancies. Although a few similarities in P and K rate recommendations were found, the different philosophies, numerical presentations, and extraction procedures drove important recommendation differences. Widespread adoption of the Mehlich‐3 extraction procedure has not reduced variation in fertilizer P and K rate recommendations among the states. Instead, for states using Mehlich 3, soil test critical concentrations ranged from 30 to 75 mg P kg–1 and 60 to 175 mg K kg–1 for corn (Zea mays L.) grain and warm‐season grass hay production. The adoption of uniform soil testing terminology, sample collection guidelines, extraction methods, and interpretations across common physiographic regions, soils, and state lines remains a challenge. Differences arise because of the different soil orders and properties, climate conditions, and resulting crop responses to added P and K fertilizers. Such differences in soil‐test‐based fertilizer P and K recommendations are state specific and highlight needs to examine the soil testing and recommendation process, make soil test results end‐user friendly, and, when appropriate, standardize fundamental information used in the soil testing guidelines. Core Ideas Soil test‐based P and K fertilizer recommendations vary widely across the southern U.S. states. Mehlich‐3 and Mehlich‐1 extractions were the basis of plant available soil P and K assessment. Differences in P and K rate recommendations exists even with a consistent set of extractants. Recommendations differences are attributed to philosophical and soil properties differences. More consistent P and K recommendations would enhance the creditability of soil testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20280</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.975-988</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Soil Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-b4c5b2dfa0446c09ac32762075ecbbfcd81db8e41e610b872b359164ce86662f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-b4c5b2dfa0446c09ac32762075ecbbfcd81db8e41e610b872b359164ce86662f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7329-1150 ; 0000-0002-8545-1032 ; 0000-0002-4412-8925 ; 0000-0002-6336-8318 ; 0000-0002-0015-2034 ; 0000-0003-3447-1727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20280$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20280$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, Joao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmond, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaton, Nathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alford, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florence, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huluka, Gobena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, David Herring</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessl, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylavarapu, Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, J. Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provin, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonon, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sotomayor, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Thirteen states associated with the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group‐6 (SERA‐IEG‐6) agreed to share their soil test based P and K rate recommendations for nine major crops. The objectives were to compare fertilizer P and K rate recommendations, to look for opportunities to rationalize similar recommendations across state lines, and to examine challenges to the development of a cooperative regional approach to P and K recommendations. Mehlich‐3 (eight states), Mehlich‐1 (five states), or Lancaster (one state) extractions were the basis of plant available soil P (STP) and K (STK) assessment. Fertilizer recommendation philosophies (sufficiency, build and maintain, and/or hybrid) variation among the states might be the main reason behind such discrepancies. Although a few similarities in P and K rate recommendations were found, the different philosophies, numerical presentations, and extraction procedures drove important recommendation differences. Widespread adoption of the Mehlich‐3 extraction procedure has not reduced variation in fertilizer P and K rate recommendations among the states. Instead, for states using Mehlich 3, soil test critical concentrations ranged from 30 to 75 mg P kg–1 and 60 to 175 mg K kg–1 for corn (Zea mays L.) grain and warm‐season grass hay production. The adoption of uniform soil testing terminology, sample collection guidelines, extraction methods, and interpretations across common physiographic regions, soils, and state lines remains a challenge. Differences arise because of the different soil orders and properties, climate conditions, and resulting crop responses to added P and K fertilizers. Such differences in soil‐test‐based fertilizer P and K recommendations are state specific and highlight needs to examine the soil testing and recommendation process, make soil test results end‐user friendly, and, when appropriate, standardize fundamental information used in the soil testing guidelines. Core Ideas Soil test‐based P and K fertilizer recommendations vary widely across the southern U.S. states. Mehlich‐3 and Mehlich‐1 extractions were the basis of plant available soil P and K assessment. Differences in P and K rate recommendations exists even with a consistent set of extractants. Recommendations differences are attributed to philosophical and soil properties differences. More consistent P and K recommendations would enhance the creditability of soil testing.</description><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1qwzAQRkVpoWnaTU-gdcHpSLZkexlCfwl0kaZbI8ljohDbQeNQsusResaepErSdRfDx8Cbj-ExditgIgDkPZm1nEiQBZyxkchSlYDW4pyNINUiUWWpLtkV0RpAqBJgxJoPE7wZfN9x33Hq_ebn63tAGmJYQ1jz7aqnOGFH3HRx7QdD5HctD2ZAHtD1bYtdfeyIiAs9ER9WGMt2MULHl4vpNbtozIbw5i_HbPn48D57TuZvTy-z6TxxKZSQ2MwpK-vGQJZpB6Vxqcy1hFyhs7ZxdSFqW2AmUAuwRS5tqkqhM4eF1lo26ZjdnXqPbwRsqm3wrQn7SkB1MFQdDFVHQxEWJ_jTb3D_D1ktpq_ydPMLqOhsVA</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Zhang, Hailin</creator><creator>Antonangelo, Joao</creator><creator>Grove, John</creator><creator>Osmond, Deanna</creator><creator>Slaton, Nathan A.</creator><creator>Alford, Shannon</creator><creator>Florence, Robert</creator><creator>Huluka, Gobena</creator><creator>Hardy, David Herring</creator><creator>Lessl, Jason</creator><creator>Maguire, Rory</creator><creator>Mylavarapu, Rao</creator><creator>Oldham, J. Larry</creator><creator>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creator><creator>Provin, Tony</creator><creator>Sonon, Leticia</creator><creator>Sotomayor, David</creator><creator>Wang, Jim</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-1032</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-8925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-8318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-2034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-1727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA</title><author>Zhang, Hailin ; Antonangelo, Joao ; Grove, John ; Osmond, Deanna ; Slaton, Nathan A. ; Alford, Shannon ; Florence, Robert ; Huluka, Gobena ; Hardy, David Herring ; Lessl, Jason ; Maguire, Rory ; Mylavarapu, Rao ; Oldham, J. Larry ; Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Provin, Tony ; Sonon, Leticia ; Sotomayor, David ; Wang, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3090-b4c5b2dfa0446c09ac32762075ecbbfcd81db8e41e610b872b359164ce86662f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hailin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, Joao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osmond, Deanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaton, Nathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alford, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Florence, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huluka, Gobena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardy, David Herring</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessl, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mylavarapu, Rao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, J. Larry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Provin, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonon, Leticia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sotomayor, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Hailin</au><au>Antonangelo, Joao</au><au>Grove, John</au><au>Osmond, Deanna</au><au>Slaton, Nathan A.</au><au>Alford, Shannon</au><au>Florence, Robert</au><au>Huluka, Gobena</au><au>Hardy, David Herring</au><au>Lessl, Jason</au><au>Maguire, Rory</au><au>Mylavarapu, Rao</au><au>Oldham, J. Larry</au><au>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</au><au>Provin, Tony</au><au>Sonon, Leticia</au><au>Sotomayor, David</au><au>Wang, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>975-988</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><abstract>Thirteen states associated with the Southern Extension and Research Activities Information Exchange Group‐6 (SERA‐IEG‐6) agreed to share their soil test based P and K rate recommendations for nine major crops. The objectives were to compare fertilizer P and K rate recommendations, to look for opportunities to rationalize similar recommendations across state lines, and to examine challenges to the development of a cooperative regional approach to P and K recommendations. Mehlich‐3 (eight states), Mehlich‐1 (five states), or Lancaster (one state) extractions were the basis of plant available soil P (STP) and K (STK) assessment. Fertilizer recommendation philosophies (sufficiency, build and maintain, and/or hybrid) variation among the states might be the main reason behind such discrepancies. Although a few similarities in P and K rate recommendations were found, the different philosophies, numerical presentations, and extraction procedures drove important recommendation differences. Widespread adoption of the Mehlich‐3 extraction procedure has not reduced variation in fertilizer P and K rate recommendations among the states. Instead, for states using Mehlich 3, soil test critical concentrations ranged from 30 to 75 mg P kg–1 and 60 to 175 mg K kg–1 for corn (Zea mays L.) grain and warm‐season grass hay production. The adoption of uniform soil testing terminology, sample collection guidelines, extraction methods, and interpretations across common physiographic regions, soils, and state lines remains a challenge. Differences arise because of the different soil orders and properties, climate conditions, and resulting crop responses to added P and K fertilizers. Such differences in soil‐test‐based fertilizer P and K recommendations are state specific and highlight needs to examine the soil testing and recommendation process, make soil test results end‐user friendly, and, when appropriate, standardize fundamental information used in the soil testing guidelines. Core Ideas Soil test‐based P and K fertilizer recommendations vary widely across the southern U.S. states. Mehlich‐3 and Mehlich‐1 extractions were the basis of plant available soil P and K assessment. Differences in P and K rate recommendations exists even with a consistent set of extractants. Recommendations differences are attributed to philosophical and soil properties differences. More consistent P and K recommendations would enhance the creditability of soil testing.</abstract><doi>10.1002/saj2.20280</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-1150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-1032</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-8925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-8318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0015-2034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3447-1727</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2021-07, Vol.85 (4), p.975-988
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_saj2_20280
source Wiley Journals
title Variation in soil‐test‐based phosphorus and potassium rate recommendations across the southern USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A06%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20soil%E2%80%90test%E2%80%90based%20phosphorus%20and%20potassium%20rate%20recommendations%20across%20the%20southern%20USA&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Zhang,%20Hailin&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=975-988&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/saj2.20280&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ESAJ220280%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true