Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States

Losses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) were compared between urea and urea treated with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (urea + NBPT) after a surface application in winter at three thinned mid‐rotation (age 15–20 years) loblolly pine plantations in Virginia, South Carolina, and F...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil Science Society of America journal 2020-03, Vol.84 (2), p.609-617
Hauptverfasser: Raymond, Jay E., Fox, Thomas R., Cook, Rachel L., Albaugh, Timothy J., Rubilar, Rafael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 617
container_issue 2
container_start_page 609
container_title Soil Science Society of America journal
container_volume 84
creator Raymond, Jay E.
Fox, Thomas R.
Cook, Rachel L.
Albaugh, Timothy J.
Rubilar, Rafael
description Losses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) were compared between urea and urea treated with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (urea + NBPT) after a surface application in winter at three thinned mid‐rotation (age 15–20 years) loblolly pine plantations in Virginia, South Carolina, and Florida. Treatments were labeled with 15N and applied to open chamber microcosms in January and February 2016. Fifteen days after application, microcosms were removed from the field to determine fertilizer N lost from each microcosm. Losses following fertilization with urea (24% to 50%) were greater (p ≥ .05) at all sites compared to urea + NBPT (12% to 22%). Fertilizer N losses were greater in Florida than in SC and Virginia although N loss following urea fertilization was still 25% in Virginia. The loss of fertilizer N was consistently lower on beds compared to interbeds for both urea (bed = 25%, interbed = 40%) and urea + NBPT (bed = 12%, interbed = 23%). This research highlights the value of using urea + NBPT to reduce fertilizer N losses after a winter application and the greater potential loss in the interbed on wetter sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/saj2.20017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_saj2_20017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>SAJ220017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2737-c89c1e9f6d207a3d88a5c910d321414c5eb48155a51cb0a308a74c402a24ece43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HOwtZJNtmPYylqlYKH2vMyzc62KdtsSVZKPfjbTVu9enpn4JkH5mXsXsBIAMjHgBs5kgAiv2ADoVKdQJaJSzaANBOJLkt9zW5C2ERClwAD9j3rQqDAu4Y35Hvb2i_y3NnedytyHJs-rsj31h2HPwR72zluHe_Xnohv0eGKar6zjviuRdefgJO1XxMP3WcMDFHh-CLKIzuPDIVbdtVgG-juN4ds8fz0MZkms_eX18l4lhiZp3liitIIKpuslpBjWhcFalMKqFMplFBG01IVQmvUwiwBUygwV0aBRKnIkEqH7OHsNT7-66mpdt5u0R8qAdWxuerYXHVqLsLiDO9tS4d_yGo-fpPnmx9rx3L2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Raymond, Jay E. ; Fox, Thomas R. ; Cook, Rachel L. ; Albaugh, Timothy J. ; Rubilar, Rafael</creator><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Jay E. ; Fox, Thomas R. ; Cook, Rachel L. ; Albaugh, Timothy J. ; Rubilar, Rafael</creatorcontrib><description>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) were compared between urea and urea treated with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (urea + NBPT) after a surface application in winter at three thinned mid‐rotation (age 15–20 years) loblolly pine plantations in Virginia, South Carolina, and Florida. Treatments were labeled with 15N and applied to open chamber microcosms in January and February 2016. Fifteen days after application, microcosms were removed from the field to determine fertilizer N lost from each microcosm. Losses following fertilization with urea (24% to 50%) were greater (p ≥ .05) at all sites compared to urea + NBPT (12% to 22%). Fertilizer N losses were greater in Florida than in SC and Virginia although N loss following urea fertilization was still 25% in Virginia. The loss of fertilizer N was consistently lower on beds compared to interbeds for both urea (bed = 25%, interbed = 40%) and urea + NBPT (bed = 12%, interbed = 23%). This research highlights the value of using urea + NBPT to reduce fertilizer N losses after a winter application and the greater potential loss in the interbed on wetter sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-5995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/saj2.20017</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Soil Science Society of America journal, 2020-03, Vol.84 (2), p.609-617</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Soil Science Society of America Journal © 2019 Soil Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2737-c89c1e9f6d207a3d88a5c910d321414c5eb48155a51cb0a308a74c402a24ece43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2737-c89c1e9f6d207a3d88a5c910d321414c5eb48155a51cb0a308a74c402a24ece43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1605-9069</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20017$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsaj2.20017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Jay E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaugh, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubilar, Rafael</creatorcontrib><title>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States</title><title>Soil Science Society of America journal</title><description>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) were compared between urea and urea treated with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (urea + NBPT) after a surface application in winter at three thinned mid‐rotation (age 15–20 years) loblolly pine plantations in Virginia, South Carolina, and Florida. Treatments were labeled with 15N and applied to open chamber microcosms in January and February 2016. Fifteen days after application, microcosms were removed from the field to determine fertilizer N lost from each microcosm. Losses following fertilization with urea (24% to 50%) were greater (p ≥ .05) at all sites compared to urea + NBPT (12% to 22%). Fertilizer N losses were greater in Florida than in SC and Virginia although N loss following urea fertilization was still 25% in Virginia. The loss of fertilizer N was consistently lower on beds compared to interbeds for both urea (bed = 25%, interbed = 40%) and urea + NBPT (bed = 12%, interbed = 23%). This research highlights the value of using urea + NBPT to reduce fertilizer N losses after a winter application and the greater potential loss in the interbed on wetter sites.</description><issn>0361-5995</issn><issn>1435-0661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HOwtZJNtmPYylqlYKH2vMyzc62KdtsSVZKPfjbTVu9enpn4JkH5mXsXsBIAMjHgBs5kgAiv2ADoVKdQJaJSzaANBOJLkt9zW5C2ERClwAD9j3rQqDAu4Y35Hvb2i_y3NnedytyHJs-rsj31h2HPwR72zluHe_Xnohv0eGKar6zjviuRdefgJO1XxMP3WcMDFHh-CLKIzuPDIVbdtVgG-juN4ds8fz0MZkms_eX18l4lhiZp3liitIIKpuslpBjWhcFalMKqFMplFBG01IVQmvUwiwBUygwV0aBRKnIkEqH7OHsNT7-66mpdt5u0R8qAdWxuerYXHVqLsLiDO9tS4d_yGo-fpPnmx9rx3L2</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Raymond, Jay E.</creator><creator>Fox, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Cook, Rachel L.</creator><creator>Albaugh, Timothy J.</creator><creator>Rubilar, Rafael</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-9069</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States</title><author>Raymond, Jay E. ; Fox, Thomas R. ; Cook, Rachel L. ; Albaugh, Timothy J. ; Rubilar, Rafael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2737-c89c1e9f6d207a3d88a5c910d321414c5eb48155a51cb0a308a74c402a24ece43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raymond, Jay E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook, Rachel L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albaugh, Timothy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubilar, Rafael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raymond, Jay E.</au><au>Fox, Thomas R.</au><au>Cook, Rachel L.</au><au>Albaugh, Timothy J.</au><au>Rubilar, Rafael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States</atitle><jtitle>Soil Science Society of America journal</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>617</epage><pages>609-617</pages><issn>0361-5995</issn><eissn>1435-0661</eissn><abstract>Losses of fertilizer nitrogen (N) were compared between urea and urea treated with the urease inhibitor N‐(n‐Butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (urea + NBPT) after a surface application in winter at three thinned mid‐rotation (age 15–20 years) loblolly pine plantations in Virginia, South Carolina, and Florida. Treatments were labeled with 15N and applied to open chamber microcosms in January and February 2016. Fifteen days after application, microcosms were removed from the field to determine fertilizer N lost from each microcosm. Losses following fertilization with urea (24% to 50%) were greater (p ≥ .05) at all sites compared to urea + NBPT (12% to 22%). Fertilizer N losses were greater in Florida than in SC and Virginia although N loss following urea fertilization was still 25% in Virginia. The loss of fertilizer N was consistently lower on beds compared to interbeds for both urea (bed = 25%, interbed = 40%) and urea + NBPT (bed = 12%, interbed = 23%). This research highlights the value of using urea + NBPT to reduce fertilizer N losses after a winter application and the greater potential loss in the interbed on wetter sites.</abstract><doi>10.1002/saj2.20017</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-9069</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-5995
ispartof Soil Science Society of America journal, 2020-03, Vol.84 (2), p.609-617
issn 0361-5995
1435-0661
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_saj2_20017
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Losses of fertilizer nitrogen after a winter fertilization in three managed pine plantations of the southeastern United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A34%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Losses%20of%20fertilizer%20nitrogen%20after%20a%20winter%20fertilization%20in%20three%20managed%20pine%20plantations%20of%20the%20southeastern%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Soil%20Science%20Society%20of%20America%20journal&rft.au=Raymond,%20Jay%20E.&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=617&rft.pages=609-617&rft.issn=0361-5995&rft.eissn=1435-0661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/saj2.20017&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ESAJ220017%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true