A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules

Resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization spectrometry (REMPI), using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometers and tuned lasers, has proved an important ultra‐sensitive analytical technique. Nevertheless, conventional nanosecond REMPI suffers from a number of shortcomings: most importantly, REMPI often fai...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 1995, Vol.9 (15), p.1522-1527
Hauptverfasser: Ledingham, Kenneth W. D., Deas, Robert M., Marshall, Archibald, McCanny, Thomas, Singhal, Ravi P., Kilic, Hamdi S., Kosmidis, Costantine, Langley, Andrew J., Shaikh, Waseem
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1527
container_issue 15
container_start_page 1522
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 9
creator Ledingham, Kenneth W. D.
Deas, Robert M.
Marshall, Archibald
McCanny, Thomas
Singhal, Ravi P.
Kilic, Hamdi S.
Kosmidis, Costantine
Langley, Andrew J.
Shaikh, Waseem
description Resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization spectrometry (REMPI), using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometers and tuned lasers, has proved an important ultra‐sensitive analytical technique. Nevertheless, conventional nanosecond REMPI suffers from a number of shortcomings: most importantly, REMPI often fails through rapidly (pre)dissociating states. In the case of thermally labile molecules, which include the nitro‐molecules, either no or very small parent or high/mass fragment ion peaks exist, making the interpretation of the mass spectra ambiguous at best and often impossible. Femtosecond laser mass spectrometry (FLMS) can often ‘defeat’ these dissociative states, resulting in large parent or high‐mass fragment ion peaks which make the interpretation less ambiguous. In the present paper, nanosecond and femtosecond multiphoton ionization and fragmentation are compared using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for NO2 gas and a number of different nitro‐molecules: nitromethane, nitrobenzene, m‐nitrotoluene, dinitrotoluene and trinitrotoluene.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcm.1290091512
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_rcm_1290091512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>RCM1290091512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-aaf1edd4fde6274a62e3f2a7a9cc82040982f4fe1df89d38e4d7928d2502e1283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZZ0fSBnbSRMvq_IoUgsSFJWdZdljYZrElZ0KytcTCA-xYjG6mtE9sziEnFIYUQB2FnQ9okwACJpTtkcGFESRAuN0nwxA5DTNqCgPyVGMzwCU5gwGZD1JtK83Krjom8TbxGLd-ojaNyZR3TSq-V7rbdW6zZNvu6bzjXtTbRefLeNi9Nr1B-tDEn2NSePa4NPaV6i3FcZjcmBVFfHkK4fk4fJiOZ2l89ur6-lknmouOEuVshSNyazBMSsyNWbILVOFElqXDDIQJbOZRWpsKQwvMTOFYKVhOTCkrORDMur_6uBjDGjlJrhahZ2kID9UyU6V_FXVAaIHXlyFu3_a8m66-MOmPetii68_rAprOS54kcvVzZU8n_HFfbZaykf-DlHyf4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D. ; Deas, Robert M. ; Marshall, Archibald ; McCanny, Thomas ; Singhal, Ravi P. ; Kilic, Hamdi S. ; Kosmidis, Costantine ; Langley, Andrew J. ; Shaikh, Waseem</creator><creatorcontrib>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D. ; Deas, Robert M. ; Marshall, Archibald ; McCanny, Thomas ; Singhal, Ravi P. ; Kilic, Hamdi S. ; Kosmidis, Costantine ; Langley, Andrew J. ; Shaikh, Waseem</creatorcontrib><description>Resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization spectrometry (REMPI), using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometers and tuned lasers, has proved an important ultra‐sensitive analytical technique. Nevertheless, conventional nanosecond REMPI suffers from a number of shortcomings: most importantly, REMPI often fails through rapidly (pre)dissociating states. In the case of thermally labile molecules, which include the nitro‐molecules, either no or very small parent or high/mass fragment ion peaks exist, making the interpretation of the mass spectra ambiguous at best and often impossible. Femtosecond laser mass spectrometry (FLMS) can often ‘defeat’ these dissociative states, resulting in large parent or high‐mass fragment ion peaks which make the interpretation less ambiguous. In the present paper, nanosecond and femtosecond multiphoton ionization and fragmentation are compared using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for NO2 gas and a number of different nitro‐molecules: nitromethane, nitrobenzene, m‐nitrotoluene, dinitrotoluene and trinitrotoluene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1290091512</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Heyden &amp; Son Limited</publisher><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1995, Vol.9 (15), p.1522-1527</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-aaf1edd4fde6274a62e3f2a7a9cc82040982f4fe1df89d38e4d7928d2502e1283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-aaf1edd4fde6274a62e3f2a7a9cc82040982f4fe1df89d38e4d7928d2502e1283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.1290091512$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.1290091512$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deas, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Archibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCanny, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Ravi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Hamdi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, Costantine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Waseem</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization spectrometry (REMPI), using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometers and tuned lasers, has proved an important ultra‐sensitive analytical technique. Nevertheless, conventional nanosecond REMPI suffers from a number of shortcomings: most importantly, REMPI often fails through rapidly (pre)dissociating states. In the case of thermally labile molecules, which include the nitro‐molecules, either no or very small parent or high/mass fragment ion peaks exist, making the interpretation of the mass spectra ambiguous at best and often impossible. Femtosecond laser mass spectrometry (FLMS) can often ‘defeat’ these dissociative states, resulting in large parent or high‐mass fragment ion peaks which make the interpretation less ambiguous. In the present paper, nanosecond and femtosecond multiphoton ionization and fragmentation are compared using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for NO2 gas and a number of different nitro‐molecules: nitromethane, nitrobenzene, m‐nitrotoluene, dinitrotoluene and trinitrotoluene.</description><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZZ0fSBnbSRMvq_IoUgsSFJWdZdljYZrElZ0KytcTCA-xYjG6mtE9sziEnFIYUQB2FnQ9okwACJpTtkcGFESRAuN0nwxA5DTNqCgPyVGMzwCU5gwGZD1JtK83Krjom8TbxGLd-ojaNyZR3TSq-V7rbdW6zZNvu6bzjXtTbRefLeNi9Nr1B-tDEn2NSePa4NPaV6i3FcZjcmBVFfHkK4fk4fJiOZ2l89ur6-lknmouOEuVshSNyazBMSsyNWbILVOFElqXDDIQJbOZRWpsKQwvMTOFYKVhOTCkrORDMur_6uBjDGjlJrhahZ2kID9UyU6V_FXVAaIHXlyFu3_a8m66-MOmPetii68_rAprOS54kcvVzZU8n_HFfbZaykf-DlHyf4Q</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D.</creator><creator>Deas, Robert M.</creator><creator>Marshall, Archibald</creator><creator>McCanny, Thomas</creator><creator>Singhal, Ravi P.</creator><creator>Kilic, Hamdi S.</creator><creator>Kosmidis, Costantine</creator><creator>Langley, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Shaikh, Waseem</creator><general>Heyden &amp; Son Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules</title><author>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D. ; Deas, Robert M. ; Marshall, Archibald ; McCanny, Thomas ; Singhal, Ravi P. ; Kilic, Hamdi S. ; Kosmidis, Costantine ; Langley, Andrew J. ; Shaikh, Waseem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3932-aaf1edd4fde6274a62e3f2a7a9cc82040982f4fe1df89d38e4d7928d2502e1283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deas, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Archibald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCanny, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singhal, Ravi P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Hamdi S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosmidis, Costantine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langley, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, Waseem</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ledingham, Kenneth W. D.</au><au>Deas, Robert M.</au><au>Marshall, Archibald</au><au>McCanny, Thomas</au><au>Singhal, Ravi P.</au><au>Kilic, Hamdi S.</au><au>Kosmidis, Costantine</au><au>Langley, Andrew J.</au><au>Shaikh, Waseem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>1522</spage><epage>1527</epage><pages>1522-1527</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Resonance‐enhanced multiphoton ionization spectrometry (REMPI), using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometers and tuned lasers, has proved an important ultra‐sensitive analytical technique. Nevertheless, conventional nanosecond REMPI suffers from a number of shortcomings: most importantly, REMPI often fails through rapidly (pre)dissociating states. In the case of thermally labile molecules, which include the nitro‐molecules, either no or very small parent or high/mass fragment ion peaks exist, making the interpretation of the mass spectra ambiguous at best and often impossible. Femtosecond laser mass spectrometry (FLMS) can often ‘defeat’ these dissociative states, resulting in large parent or high‐mass fragment ion peaks which make the interpretation less ambiguous. In the present paper, nanosecond and femtosecond multiphoton ionization and fragmentation are compared using time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for NO2 gas and a number of different nitro‐molecules: nitromethane, nitrobenzene, m‐nitrotoluene, dinitrotoluene and trinitrotoluene.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Heyden &amp; Son Limited</pub><doi>10.1002/rcm.1290091512</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 1995, Vol.9 (15), p.1522-1527
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_rcm_1290091512
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title A comparison of femtosecond and nanosecond multiphoton ionization and dissociation for some nitro-molecules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T16%3A48%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20femtosecond%20and%20nanosecond%20multiphoton%20ionization%20and%20dissociation%20for%20some%20nitro-molecules&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Ledingham,%20Kenneth%20W.%20D.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=1522&rft.epage=1527&rft.pages=1522-1527&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.1290091512&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ERCM1290091512%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true