Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms

A detailed theoretical study on the reaction mechanisms for the formations of H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 from the self‐reaction of HO 2 radicals under the effect of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 catalysts was performed using the CCSD(T)/CBS//M06‐2X/aug‐cc‐pVTZ method. The rate constant was computed usin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of quantum chemistry 2020-12, Vol.120 (23)
Hauptverfasser: Wen, Mingjie, Cao, Xiru, Zhang, Yongqi, Liang, Meng, Zhang, Tianlei, Muthiah, Balaganesh, Zhou, Ke, Roy, Soumendra K., Lily, Makroni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 23
container_start_page
container_title International journal of quantum chemistry
container_volume 120
creator Wen, Mingjie
Cao, Xiru
Zhang, Yongqi
Liang, Meng
Zhang, Tianlei
Muthiah, Balaganesh
Zhou, Ke
Roy, Soumendra K.
Lily, Makroni
description A detailed theoretical study on the reaction mechanisms for the formations of H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 from the self‐reaction of HO 2 radicals under the effect of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 catalysts was performed using the CCSD(T)/CBS//M06‐2X/aug‐cc‐pVTZ method. The rate constant was computed using canonical variational transition state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling (SCT). Our results indicate that NH 3 ‐, H 3 N···H 2 O‐, and H 2 SO 4 ‐catalyzed reactions could proceed through both one‐step and stepwise routes. Calculated rate constants show that the catalyzed routes in the presence of the three catalysts all prefer stepwise pathways. Compared to the catalytic efficiency of H 2 O, the efficiencies of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 are much lower due to their smaller relative concentrations. The present results have provided a definitive example of how basic and acidic catalysts influence the atmospheric reaction of HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 . These results further encourage one to consider the effects of basic and acidic catalysts on the related atmospheric reactions. Thus, the present investigation should have broad implications in the gas‐phase reactions of the atmosphere.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qua.26389
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_qua_26389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_qua_26389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-3b52df8783d5a1a0b8bb18e6e945374e5d132feb5a25f2f35cda68e49cf8dd013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtKAzEUDaJgrS78g2xFpyaTeWTcSalWKHTThbshk9zQSGcyJlOKu64Ed-Ln-Dn9EjPVgovLPQ_ug4PQJSUjSkh8-7oWozhjvDhCA0qKPEoy-nyMBsEjUZ4RforOvH8hhGQsywfoe6I1yA5bjUVd28aImwPYbT83ogMXhEZhv17ptTMSC2kUtg3uloCncxzj3fbjOtQB796_ehbIP5P12IGQnQmjJkw721rfLsHBHR7buoXO7L0Kug1Ag30H7cZ42B-3DYRvegnXIJeiMb725-hEi5WHi78-RIuHyWI8jWbzx6fx_SySeVJErEpjpXnOmUoFFaTiVUU5ZFAkKcsTSBVlsYYqFXGqY81SqUTGISmk5koRyobo6netdNZ7B7psnamFeyspKfvMy5B5uc-c_QBQwX1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wen, Mingjie ; Cao, Xiru ; Zhang, Yongqi ; Liang, Meng ; Zhang, Tianlei ; Muthiah, Balaganesh ; Zhou, Ke ; Roy, Soumendra K. ; Lily, Makroni</creator><creatorcontrib>Wen, Mingjie ; Cao, Xiru ; Zhang, Yongqi ; Liang, Meng ; Zhang, Tianlei ; Muthiah, Balaganesh ; Zhou, Ke ; Roy, Soumendra K. ; Lily, Makroni</creatorcontrib><description>A detailed theoretical study on the reaction mechanisms for the formations of H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 from the self‐reaction of HO 2 radicals under the effect of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 catalysts was performed using the CCSD(T)/CBS//M06‐2X/aug‐cc‐pVTZ method. The rate constant was computed using canonical variational transition state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling (SCT). Our results indicate that NH 3 ‐, H 3 N···H 2 O‐, and H 2 SO 4 ‐catalyzed reactions could proceed through both one‐step and stepwise routes. Calculated rate constants show that the catalyzed routes in the presence of the three catalysts all prefer stepwise pathways. Compared to the catalytic efficiency of H 2 O, the efficiencies of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 are much lower due to their smaller relative concentrations. The present results have provided a definitive example of how basic and acidic catalysts influence the atmospheric reaction of HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 . These results further encourage one to consider the effects of basic and acidic catalysts on the related atmospheric reactions. Thus, the present investigation should have broad implications in the gas‐phase reactions of the atmosphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-461X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qua.26389</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of quantum chemistry, 2020-12, Vol.120 (23)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-3b52df8783d5a1a0b8bb18e6e945374e5d132feb5a25f2f35cda68e49cf8dd013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-3b52df8783d5a1a0b8bb18e6e945374e5d132feb5a25f2f35cda68e49cf8dd013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4396-071X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wen, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xiru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthiah, Balaganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Soumendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lily, Makroni</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms</title><title>International journal of quantum chemistry</title><description>A detailed theoretical study on the reaction mechanisms for the formations of H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 from the self‐reaction of HO 2 radicals under the effect of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 catalysts was performed using the CCSD(T)/CBS//M06‐2X/aug‐cc‐pVTZ method. The rate constant was computed using canonical variational transition state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling (SCT). Our results indicate that NH 3 ‐, H 3 N···H 2 O‐, and H 2 SO 4 ‐catalyzed reactions could proceed through both one‐step and stepwise routes. Calculated rate constants show that the catalyzed routes in the presence of the three catalysts all prefer stepwise pathways. Compared to the catalytic efficiency of H 2 O, the efficiencies of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 are much lower due to their smaller relative concentrations. The present results have provided a definitive example of how basic and acidic catalysts influence the atmospheric reaction of HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 . These results further encourage one to consider the effects of basic and acidic catalysts on the related atmospheric reactions. Thus, the present investigation should have broad implications in the gas‐phase reactions of the atmosphere.</description><issn>0020-7608</issn><issn>1097-461X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMtKAzEUDaJgrS78g2xFpyaTeWTcSalWKHTThbshk9zQSGcyJlOKu64Ed-Ln-Dn9EjPVgovLPQ_ug4PQJSUjSkh8-7oWozhjvDhCA0qKPEoy-nyMBsEjUZ4RforOvH8hhGQsywfoe6I1yA5bjUVd28aImwPYbT83ogMXhEZhv17ptTMSC2kUtg3uloCncxzj3fbjOtQB796_ehbIP5P12IGQnQmjJkw721rfLsHBHR7buoXO7L0Kug1Ag30H7cZ42B-3DYRvegnXIJeiMb725-hEi5WHi78-RIuHyWI8jWbzx6fx_SySeVJErEpjpXnOmUoFFaTiVUU5ZFAkKcsTSBVlsYYqFXGqY81SqUTGISmk5koRyobo6netdNZ7B7psnamFeyspKfvMy5B5uc-c_QBQwX1o</recordid><startdate>20201205</startdate><enddate>20201205</enddate><creator>Wen, Mingjie</creator><creator>Cao, Xiru</creator><creator>Zhang, Yongqi</creator><creator>Liang, Meng</creator><creator>Zhang, Tianlei</creator><creator>Muthiah, Balaganesh</creator><creator>Zhou, Ke</creator><creator>Roy, Soumendra K.</creator><creator>Lily, Makroni</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-071X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201205</creationdate><title>Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms</title><author>Wen, Mingjie ; Cao, Xiru ; Zhang, Yongqi ; Liang, Meng ; Zhang, Tianlei ; Muthiah, Balaganesh ; Zhou, Ke ; Roy, Soumendra K. ; Lily, Makroni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-3b52df8783d5a1a0b8bb18e6e945374e5d132feb5a25f2f35cda68e49cf8dd013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wen, Mingjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xiru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthiah, Balaganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Soumendra K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lily, Makroni</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of quantum chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wen, Mingjie</au><au>Cao, Xiru</au><au>Zhang, Yongqi</au><au>Liang, Meng</au><au>Zhang, Tianlei</au><au>Muthiah, Balaganesh</au><au>Zhou, Ke</au><au>Roy, Soumendra K.</au><au>Lily, Makroni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>International journal of quantum chemistry</jtitle><date>2020-12-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>23</issue><issn>0020-7608</issn><eissn>1097-461X</eissn><abstract>A detailed theoretical study on the reaction mechanisms for the formations of H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 from the self‐reaction of HO 2 radicals under the effect of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 catalysts was performed using the CCSD(T)/CBS//M06‐2X/aug‐cc‐pVTZ method. The rate constant was computed using canonical variational transition state theory (CVT) with small curvature tunneling (SCT). Our results indicate that NH 3 ‐, H 3 N···H 2 O‐, and H 2 SO 4 ‐catalyzed reactions could proceed through both one‐step and stepwise routes. Calculated rate constants show that the catalyzed routes in the presence of the three catalysts all prefer stepwise pathways. Compared to the catalytic efficiency of H 2 O, the efficiencies of NH 3 , H 3 N···H 2 O, and H 2 SO 4 are much lower due to their smaller relative concentrations. The present results have provided a definitive example of how basic and acidic catalysts influence the atmospheric reaction of HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  +  3 O 2 . These results further encourage one to consider the effects of basic and acidic catalysts on the related atmospheric reactions. Thus, the present investigation should have broad implications in the gas‐phase reactions of the atmosphere.</abstract><doi>10.1002/qua.26389</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4396-071X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7608
ispartof International journal of quantum chemistry, 2020-12, Vol.120 (23)
issn 0020-7608
1097-461X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_qua_26389
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Effect of ammonia, ammonia‐water, and sulfuric acid on the HO 2  + HO 2  → H 2 O 2  + 3O 2 reaction in troposphere: Competition between stepwise and one‐step mechanisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20ammonia,%20ammonia%E2%80%90water,%20and%20sulfuric%20acid%20on%20the%20HO%202%20%E2%80%89+%E2%80%89HO%202%20%E2%80%89%E2%86%92%E2%80%89H%202%20O%202%20%E2%80%89+%E2%80%893O%202%20reaction%20in%20troposphere:%20Competition%20between%20stepwise%20and%20one%E2%80%90step%20mechanisms&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20quantum%20chemistry&rft.au=Wen,%20Mingjie&rft.date=2020-12-05&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=23&rft.issn=0020-7608&rft.eissn=1097-461X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qua.26389&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_qua_26389%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true