Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland

Four operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were evaluated in winter conditions against (a) synoptic observations in Europe, (b) observations at a 48 m high micrometeorological mast in Sodankylä, northern Finland, and (c) observations at the Helsinki Testbed stations: (i) to evaluate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 2012-07, Vol.138 (667), p.1440-1451
Hauptverfasser: Atlaskin, Evgeny, Vihma, Timo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1451
container_issue 667
container_start_page 1440
container_title Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 138
creator Atlaskin, Evgeny
Vihma, Timo
description Four operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were evaluated in winter conditions against (a) synoptic observations in Europe, (b) observations at a 48 m high micrometeorological mast in Sodankylä, northern Finland, and (c) observations at the Helsinki Testbed stations: (i) to evaluate the skills of the models to compute nocturnal 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the temperature inversion; and (ii) to distinguish between the T2m bias and the subgrid‐scale spatial variability of T2m. The models were (1) the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), (2) the High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), (3) the Applications of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) developed by Météo‐France, and (4) the Global Forecasting System (GFS) of the US National Center for Environmental Predictions (NCEP). The results demonstrated a T2m bias increasing with decreasing temperature and strengthening temperature inversion. When a strong temperature inversion was observed in Sodankylä, the models underestimated it, whereas in near‐neutral conditions the stratification was overestimated. Comparison of observed and modelled 3 h temperature tendencies showed that the T2m tendency in the models was on average only 17–20% of the observed one. The warm bias in T2m forecast in Sodankylä during periods of observed temperature inversion partly resulted from a warm bias in the initial conditions. This was due to problems in data assimilation in IFS and HIRLAM, in initialization in AROME, and in either or both procedures in GFS. In particular, the IFS data assimilation increased the T2m bias. Evaluation of modelled T2m against grid‐averaged T2m observed at Helsinki Testbed demonstrated that the T2m model error dominated over the spatial variability of observed T2m. This suggests that over an almost flat terrain horizontal resolution is not a major factor for the accuracy of T2m forecast at low T2m typically associated with temperature inversions. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qj.1885
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_qj_1885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_N2144Q1X_L</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-61ea5c8c79b3eb56f0927c6aeaa4c6dae25ec10a62d94ae132e83ef6394dcc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1rwkAQBuCltFBrS__C3nooafcjyWaPRbQfiK0g6G0ZNxOIjVndTbT--0aU3np6YeZhGF5C7jl74oyJ5-3qiWdZckF6PFYqyhRbXJIeYzKJNGP6mtyEsGKMJUqoHimGO6haaEpXU1fQyfyLegxt1QRaOE_3Zd2gb8o10trZpvU1VHTp2joHf4gqOKCnDa436KFbYqBu102GrXcbpFDndFTWVZe35KqAKuDdOftkNhrOBm_R-PP1ffAyjqzQOolSjpDYzCq9lLhM0oJpoWwKCBDbNAcUCVrOIBW5jgG5FJhJLFKp49xaKfvk4XTWeheCx8JsfLnuXjWcmWM7Zrsyx3Y6-XiS-7LCw3_MTD_OOjrpMjT486fBf5tUSZWY-eTVTASP4ylfmLH8BdJ4dxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Atlaskin, Evgeny ; Vihma, Timo</creator><creatorcontrib>Atlaskin, Evgeny ; Vihma, Timo</creatorcontrib><description>Four operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were evaluated in winter conditions against (a) synoptic observations in Europe, (b) observations at a 48 m high micrometeorological mast in Sodankylä, northern Finland, and (c) observations at the Helsinki Testbed stations: (i) to evaluate the skills of the models to compute nocturnal 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the temperature inversion; and (ii) to distinguish between the T2m bias and the subgrid‐scale spatial variability of T2m. The models were (1) the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), (2) the High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), (3) the Applications of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) developed by Météo‐France, and (4) the Global Forecasting System (GFS) of the US National Center for Environmental Predictions (NCEP). The results demonstrated a T2m bias increasing with decreasing temperature and strengthening temperature inversion. When a strong temperature inversion was observed in Sodankylä, the models underestimated it, whereas in near‐neutral conditions the stratification was overestimated. Comparison of observed and modelled 3 h temperature tendencies showed that the T2m tendency in the models was on average only 17–20% of the observed one. The warm bias in T2m forecast in Sodankylä during periods of observed temperature inversion partly resulted from a warm bias in the initial conditions. This was due to problems in data assimilation in IFS and HIRLAM, in initialization in AROME, and in either or both procedures in GFS. In particular, the IFS data assimilation increased the T2m bias. Evaluation of modelled T2m against grid‐averaged T2m observed at Helsinki Testbed demonstrated that the T2m model error dominated over the spatial variability of observed T2m. This suggests that over an almost flat terrain horizontal resolution is not a major factor for the accuracy of T2m forecast at low T2m typically associated with temperature inversions. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-870X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qj.1885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>mesoscale observational network ; model verificationw ; numerical weather prediction ; stable boundary layer ; subgrid-scale variability ; two-metre temperature</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2012-07, Vol.138 (667), p.1440-1451</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-61ea5c8c79b3eb56f0927c6aeaa4c6dae25ec10a62d94ae132e83ef6394dcc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-61ea5c8c79b3eb56f0927c6aeaa4c6dae25ec10a62d94ae132e83ef6394dcc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqj.1885$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqj.1885$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atlaskin, Evgeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vihma, Timo</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland</title><title>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</title><addtitle>Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc</addtitle><description>Four operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were evaluated in winter conditions against (a) synoptic observations in Europe, (b) observations at a 48 m high micrometeorological mast in Sodankylä, northern Finland, and (c) observations at the Helsinki Testbed stations: (i) to evaluate the skills of the models to compute nocturnal 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the temperature inversion; and (ii) to distinguish between the T2m bias and the subgrid‐scale spatial variability of T2m. The models were (1) the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), (2) the High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), (3) the Applications of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) developed by Météo‐France, and (4) the Global Forecasting System (GFS) of the US National Center for Environmental Predictions (NCEP). The results demonstrated a T2m bias increasing with decreasing temperature and strengthening temperature inversion. When a strong temperature inversion was observed in Sodankylä, the models underestimated it, whereas in near‐neutral conditions the stratification was overestimated. Comparison of observed and modelled 3 h temperature tendencies showed that the T2m tendency in the models was on average only 17–20% of the observed one. The warm bias in T2m forecast in Sodankylä during periods of observed temperature inversion partly resulted from a warm bias in the initial conditions. This was due to problems in data assimilation in IFS and HIRLAM, in initialization in AROME, and in either or both procedures in GFS. In particular, the IFS data assimilation increased the T2m bias. Evaluation of modelled T2m against grid‐averaged T2m observed at Helsinki Testbed demonstrated that the T2m model error dominated over the spatial variability of observed T2m. This suggests that over an almost flat terrain horizontal resolution is not a major factor for the accuracy of T2m forecast at low T2m typically associated with temperature inversions. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society</description><subject>mesoscale observational network</subject><subject>model verificationw</subject><subject>numerical weather prediction</subject><subject>stable boundary layer</subject><subject>subgrid-scale variability</subject><subject>two-metre temperature</subject><issn>0035-9009</issn><issn>1477-870X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E1rwkAQBuCltFBrS__C3nooafcjyWaPRbQfiK0g6G0ZNxOIjVndTbT--0aU3np6YeZhGF5C7jl74oyJ5-3qiWdZckF6PFYqyhRbXJIeYzKJNGP6mtyEsGKMJUqoHimGO6haaEpXU1fQyfyLegxt1QRaOE_3Zd2gb8o10trZpvU1VHTp2joHf4gqOKCnDa436KFbYqBu102GrXcbpFDndFTWVZe35KqAKuDdOftkNhrOBm_R-PP1ffAyjqzQOolSjpDYzCq9lLhM0oJpoWwKCBDbNAcUCVrOIBW5jgG5FJhJLFKp49xaKfvk4XTWeheCx8JsfLnuXjWcmWM7Zrsyx3Y6-XiS-7LCw3_MTD_OOjrpMjT486fBf5tUSZWY-eTVTASP4ylfmLH8BdJ4dxQ</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Atlaskin, Evgeny</creator><creator>Vihma, Timo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland</title><author>Atlaskin, Evgeny ; Vihma, Timo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2995-61ea5c8c79b3eb56f0927c6aeaa4c6dae25ec10a62d94ae132e83ef6394dcc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>mesoscale observational network</topic><topic>model verificationw</topic><topic>numerical weather prediction</topic><topic>stable boundary layer</topic><topic>subgrid-scale variability</topic><topic>two-metre temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atlaskin, Evgeny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vihma, Timo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atlaskin, Evgeny</au><au>Vihma, Timo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle><addtitle>Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>667</issue><spage>1440</spage><epage>1451</epage><pages>1440-1451</pages><issn>0035-9009</issn><eissn>1477-870X</eissn><abstract>Four operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were evaluated in winter conditions against (a) synoptic observations in Europe, (b) observations at a 48 m high micrometeorological mast in Sodankylä, northern Finland, and (c) observations at the Helsinki Testbed stations: (i) to evaluate the skills of the models to compute nocturnal 2 m air temperature (T2m) and the temperature inversion; and (ii) to distinguish between the T2m bias and the subgrid‐scale spatial variability of T2m. The models were (1) the Integrated Forecast System (IFS) of the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), (2) the High Resolution Limited Area Model (HIRLAM), (3) the Applications of Research to Operations at Mesoscale (AROME) developed by Météo‐France, and (4) the Global Forecasting System (GFS) of the US National Center for Environmental Predictions (NCEP). The results demonstrated a T2m bias increasing with decreasing temperature and strengthening temperature inversion. When a strong temperature inversion was observed in Sodankylä, the models underestimated it, whereas in near‐neutral conditions the stratification was overestimated. Comparison of observed and modelled 3 h temperature tendencies showed that the T2m tendency in the models was on average only 17–20% of the observed one. The warm bias in T2m forecast in Sodankylä during periods of observed temperature inversion partly resulted from a warm bias in the initial conditions. This was due to problems in data assimilation in IFS and HIRLAM, in initialization in AROME, and in either or both procedures in GFS. In particular, the IFS data assimilation increased the T2m bias. Evaluation of modelled T2m against grid‐averaged T2m observed at Helsinki Testbed demonstrated that the T2m model error dominated over the spatial variability of observed T2m. This suggests that over an almost flat terrain horizontal resolution is not a major factor for the accuracy of T2m forecast at low T2m typically associated with temperature inversions. Copyright © 2012 Royal Meteorological Society</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qj.1885</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-9009
ispartof Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2012-07, Vol.138 (667), p.1440-1451
issn 0035-9009
1477-870X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_qj_1885
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects mesoscale observational network
model verificationw
numerical weather prediction
stable boundary layer
subgrid-scale variability
two-metre temperature
title Evaluation of NWP results for wintertime nocturnal boundary-layer temperatures over Europe and Finland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T02%3A34%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20NWP%20results%20for%20wintertime%20nocturnal%20boundary-layer%20temperatures%20over%20Europe%20and%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Atlaskin,%20Evgeny&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=667&rft.spage=1440&rft.epage=1451&rft.pages=1440-1451&rft.issn=0035-9009&rft.eissn=1477-870X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qj.1885&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_N2144Q1X_L%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true