Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding
Simple pseudo‐steady state relations between the hydraulic and nozzle pressures of an injection molding machine were presented and verified experimentally. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the performance of simple controllers using dynamic models developed for the hydraulic and nozzle p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Polymer engineering and science 1985-08, Vol.25 (11), p.714-723 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 723 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 714 |
| container_title | Polymer engineering and science |
| container_volume | 25 |
| creator | Fara, Dib Abu Kamal, M. R. Patterson, W. I. |
| description | Simple pseudo‐steady state relations between the hydraulic and nozzle pressures of an injection molding machine were presented and verified experimentally. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the performance of simple controllers using dynamic models developed for the hydraulic and nozzle pressures. The controllers chosen were the discrete proportional, proportional‐integral (PI), and proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) types, tuned according to the ITAE criterion. The control of hydraulic pressure simulation showed that the PI controller had the best overall performance, whereas the result of nozzle pressure control loop simulation showed that the PID controller performance was better than that of the PI controller. All the controllers, in both loops, gave responses that were about an order of magnitude more rapid than the open loop response. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pen.760251109 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pen_760251109</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>PEN760251109</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-d2004e0d2d53c388dd16930ad41cacf8f31c7153e87eaf199b3e2d32077deddb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7zl43TrZ7OdRSlvFUhUUjyFNspqaTZakVdu_3tSW4kkYmMP83pvHQ-iSwIAApNedsoOygDQnBOoj1CN5ViVpQbNj1AOgaUKrqjpFZyEsIPI0r3toMfrkZsWX2lnsGhx02xmF5dryVgvcOqlMwNxKLJxdemeM8gE3zuP3tfR8ZSK0vVq32URd51UIK6-wtnEWSvz6ts5Ibd_O0UnDTVAX-91HL-PR8_A2mT5M7oY300TQHOpEpgCZApnKnIqYWEpS1BS4zIjgoqkaSkRJcqqqUvGG1PWcqlTSFMpSKinntI-Sna_wLgSvGtZ53XK_ZgTYtigWi2KHoiJ_teM7HgQ3jedW6HAQVVkBVWyxj8od9qWNWv_vyR5Hs78P9oF0WKrvg5L7D1aUtMzZ62zCxuOsfoKiYPf0BynlilI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Fara, Dib Abu ; Kamal, M. R. ; Patterson, W. I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fara, Dib Abu ; Kamal, M. R. ; Patterson, W. I.</creatorcontrib><description>Simple pseudo‐steady state relations between the hydraulic and nozzle pressures of an injection molding machine were presented and verified experimentally. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the performance of simple controllers using dynamic models developed for the hydraulic and nozzle pressures. The controllers chosen were the discrete proportional, proportional‐integral (PI), and proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) types, tuned according to the ITAE criterion. The control of hydraulic pressure simulation showed that the PI controller had the best overall performance, whereas the result of nozzle pressure control loop simulation showed that the PID controller performance was better than that of the PI controller. All the controllers, in both loops, gave responses that were about an order of magnitude more rapid than the open loop response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pen.760251109</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYESAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brookfield: Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Injection moulding ; Machinery and processing ; Moulding ; Plastics ; Polymer industry, paints, wood ; Technology of polymers</subject><ispartof>Polymer engineering and science, 1985-08, Vol.25 (11), p.714-723</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1985 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.</rights><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-d2004e0d2d53c388dd16930ad41cacf8f31c7153e87eaf199b3e2d32077deddb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-d2004e0d2d53c388dd16930ad41cacf8f31c7153e87eaf199b3e2d32077deddb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpen.760251109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpen.760251109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=8460826$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fara, Dib Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, W. I.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding</title><title>Polymer engineering and science</title><addtitle>Polym Eng Sci</addtitle><description>Simple pseudo‐steady state relations between the hydraulic and nozzle pressures of an injection molding machine were presented and verified experimentally. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the performance of simple controllers using dynamic models developed for the hydraulic and nozzle pressures. The controllers chosen were the discrete proportional, proportional‐integral (PI), and proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) types, tuned according to the ITAE criterion. The control of hydraulic pressure simulation showed that the PI controller had the best overall performance, whereas the result of nozzle pressure control loop simulation showed that the PID controller performance was better than that of the PI controller. All the controllers, in both loops, gave responses that were about an order of magnitude more rapid than the open loop response.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Injection moulding</subject><subject>Machinery and processing</subject><subject>Moulding</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Polymer industry, paints, wood</subject><subject>Technology of polymers</subject><issn>0032-3888</issn><issn>1548-2634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKtH7zl43TrZ7OdRSlvFUhUUjyFNspqaTZakVdu_3tSW4kkYmMP83pvHQ-iSwIAApNedsoOygDQnBOoj1CN5ViVpQbNj1AOgaUKrqjpFZyEsIPI0r3toMfrkZsWX2lnsGhx02xmF5dryVgvcOqlMwNxKLJxdemeM8gE3zuP3tfR8ZSK0vVq32URd51UIK6-wtnEWSvz6ts5Ibd_O0UnDTVAX-91HL-PR8_A2mT5M7oY300TQHOpEpgCZApnKnIqYWEpS1BS4zIjgoqkaSkRJcqqqUvGG1PWcqlTSFMpSKinntI-Sna_wLgSvGtZ53XK_ZgTYtigWi2KHoiJ_teM7HgQ3jedW6HAQVVkBVWyxj8od9qWNWv_vyR5Hs78P9oF0WKrvg5L7D1aUtMzZ62zCxuOsfoKiYPf0BynlilI</recordid><startdate>198508</startdate><enddate>198508</enddate><creator>Fara, Dib Abu</creator><creator>Kamal, M. R.</creator><creator>Patterson, W. I.</creator><general>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198508</creationdate><title>Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding</title><author>Fara, Dib Abu ; Kamal, M. R. ; Patterson, W. I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-d2004e0d2d53c388dd16930ad41cacf8f31c7153e87eaf199b3e2d32077deddb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Injection moulding</topic><topic>Machinery and processing</topic><topic>Moulding</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Polymer industry, paints, wood</topic><topic>Technology of polymers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fara, Dib Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, W. I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fara, Dib Abu</au><au>Kamal, M. R.</au><au>Patterson, W. I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding</atitle><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle><addtitle>Polym Eng Sci</addtitle><date>1985-08</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>723</epage><pages>714-723</pages><issn>0032-3888</issn><eissn>1548-2634</eissn><coden>PYESAZ</coden><abstract>Simple pseudo‐steady state relations between the hydraulic and nozzle pressures of an injection molding machine were presented and verified experimentally. A simulation study was performed to evaluate the performance of simple controllers using dynamic models developed for the hydraulic and nozzle pressures. The controllers chosen were the discrete proportional, proportional‐integral (PI), and proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID) types, tuned according to the ITAE criterion. The control of hydraulic pressure simulation showed that the PI controller had the best overall performance, whereas the result of nozzle pressure control loop simulation showed that the PID controller performance was better than that of the PI controller. All the controllers, in both loops, gave responses that were about an order of magnitude more rapid than the open loop response.</abstract><cop>Brookfield</cop><pub>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pen.760251109</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-3888 |
| ispartof | Polymer engineering and science, 1985-08, Vol.25 (11), p.714-723 |
| issn | 0032-3888 1548-2634 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pen_760251109 |
| source | Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology Injection moulding Machinery and processing Moulding Plastics Polymer industry, paints, wood Technology of polymers |
| title | Evaluation of simple dynamic models and controllers for hydraulic and nozzle pressure in injection molding |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A48%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20simple%20dynamic%20models%20and%20controllers%20for%20hydraulic%20and%20nozzle%20pressure%20in%20injection%20molding&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Fara,%20Dib%20Abu&rft.date=1985-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=723&rft.pages=714-723&rft.issn=0032-3888&rft.eissn=1548-2634&rft.coden=PYESAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pen.760251109&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EPEN760251109%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |