A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses

An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytochemical analysis 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120
Hauptverfasser: Ferreira, Jorge F. S., Charles, Denys J., Wood, Karl, Janick, Jules, Simon, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 120
container_issue 3
container_start_page 116
container_title Phytochemical analysis
container_volume 5
creator Ferreira, Jorge F. S.
Charles, Denys J.
Wood, Karl
Janick, Jules
Simon, James E.
description An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pca.2800050306
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pca_2800050306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_S6SN49WT_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMvsFUq7j2I7HqoKCVBUkijpaF8dpDfnDLoK8PUFFIFiY7nDP-YZDyDmDCQNILzqLkzQHAAEc5AEZMdA6YUKKQzICLfIEeJYdk5MYnwZKay1HpJxS29YdBh_bhrYl3WCkdhvaGnftJmC37Sk2Bd36zZZ2LpRtqLGxjlb-5dUXf9HhTTHsXO2jb3wzqFj10cVTclRiFd3Z1x2Th6vL1ew6WdzOb2bTRWK5yGTCdGGhAMmtwEI9WrApF1o5ISBLeQHMOVSC5xkvMc-YlUrxlGkEJRWyMuNjMtnv2tDGGFxpuuBrDL1hYD4rmaGS-ak0CHovvPnK9f_Q5m42_eUme9fHnXv_djE8G6m4Ema9nJt7eb_M9HplNP8AF2176Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-0344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pca.2800050306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Artemisinin ; electrochemical detection ; gas chromatography ; high performance liquid chromatography</subject><ispartof>Phytochemical analysis, 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpca.2800050306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpca.2800050306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Denys J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janick, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><title>Phytochemical analysis</title><addtitle>Phytochem. Anal</addtitle><description>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</description><subject>Artemisinin</subject><subject>electrochemical detection</subject><subject>gas chromatography</subject><subject>high performance liquid chromatography</subject><issn>0958-0344</issn><issn>1099-1565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMvsFUq7j2I7HqoKCVBUkijpaF8dpDfnDLoK8PUFFIFiY7nDP-YZDyDmDCQNILzqLkzQHAAEc5AEZMdA6YUKKQzICLfIEeJYdk5MYnwZKay1HpJxS29YdBh_bhrYl3WCkdhvaGnftJmC37Sk2Bd36zZZ2LpRtqLGxjlb-5dUXf9HhTTHsXO2jb3wzqFj10cVTclRiFd3Z1x2Th6vL1ew6WdzOb2bTRWK5yGTCdGGhAMmtwEI9WrApF1o5ISBLeQHMOVSC5xkvMc-YlUrxlGkEJRWyMuNjMtnv2tDGGFxpuuBrDL1hYD4rmaGS-ak0CHovvPnK9f_Q5m42_eUme9fHnXv_djE8G6m4Ema9nJt7eb_M9HplNP8AF2176Q</recordid><startdate>199405</startdate><enddate>199405</enddate><creator>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creator><creator>Charles, Denys J.</creator><creator>Wood, Karl</creator><creator>Janick, Jules</creator><creator>Simon, James E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199405</creationdate><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><author>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Artemisinin</topic><topic>electrochemical detection</topic><topic>gas chromatography</topic><topic>high performance liquid chromatography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Denys J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janick, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phytochemical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</au><au>Charles, Denys J.</au><au>Wood, Karl</au><au>Janick, Jules</au><au>Simon, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</atitle><jtitle>Phytochemical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Phytochem. Anal</addtitle><date>1994-05</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>116-120</pages><issn>0958-0344</issn><eissn>1099-1565</eissn><abstract>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/pca.2800050306</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-0344
ispartof Phytochemical analysis, 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120
issn 0958-0344
1099-1565
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pca_2800050306
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Artemisinin
electrochemical detection
gas chromatography
high performance liquid chromatography
title A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T18%3A54%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20gas%20chromatography%20and%20high%20performance%20liquid%20chromatography%20for%20artemisinin%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Phytochemical%20analysis&rft.au=Ferreira,%20Jorge%20F.%20S.&rft.date=1994-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=116-120&rft.issn=0958-0344&rft.eissn=1099-1565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pca.2800050306&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_S6SN49WT_9%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true