A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses
An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Phytochemical analysis 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 120 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | Phytochemical analysis |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Ferreira, Jorge F. S. Charles, Denys J. Wood, Karl Janick, Jules Simon, James E. |
description | An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pca.2800050306 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pca_2800050306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_S6SN49WT_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMvsFUq7j2I7HqoKCVBUkijpaF8dpDfnDLoK8PUFFIFiY7nDP-YZDyDmDCQNILzqLkzQHAAEc5AEZMdA6YUKKQzICLfIEeJYdk5MYnwZKay1HpJxS29YdBh_bhrYl3WCkdhvaGnftJmC37Sk2Bd36zZZ2LpRtqLGxjlb-5dUXf9HhTTHsXO2jb3wzqFj10cVTclRiFd3Z1x2Th6vL1ew6WdzOb2bTRWK5yGTCdGGhAMmtwEI9WrApF1o5ISBLeQHMOVSC5xkvMc-YlUrxlGkEJRWyMuNjMtnv2tDGGFxpuuBrDL1hYD4rmaGS-ak0CHovvPnK9f_Q5m42_eUme9fHnXv_djE8G6m4Ema9nJt7eb_M9HplNP8AF2176Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-0344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pca.2800050306</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Artemisinin ; electrochemical detection ; gas chromatography ; high performance liquid chromatography</subject><ispartof>Phytochemical analysis, 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpca.2800050306$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpca.2800050306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Denys J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janick, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><title>Phytochemical analysis</title><addtitle>Phytochem. Anal</addtitle><description>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</description><subject>Artemisinin</subject><subject>electrochemical detection</subject><subject>gas chromatography</subject><subject>high performance liquid chromatography</subject><issn>0958-0344</issn><issn>1099-1565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1OwzAURi0EEqWwMvsFUq7j2I7HqoKCVBUkijpaF8dpDfnDLoK8PUFFIFiY7nDP-YZDyDmDCQNILzqLkzQHAAEc5AEZMdA6YUKKQzICLfIEeJYdk5MYnwZKay1HpJxS29YdBh_bhrYl3WCkdhvaGnftJmC37Sk2Bd36zZZ2LpRtqLGxjlb-5dUXf9HhTTHsXO2jb3wzqFj10cVTclRiFd3Z1x2Th6vL1ew6WdzOb2bTRWK5yGTCdGGhAMmtwEI9WrApF1o5ISBLeQHMOVSC5xkvMc-YlUrxlGkEJRWyMuNjMtnv2tDGGFxpuuBrDL1hYD4rmaGS-ak0CHovvPnK9f_Q5m42_eUme9fHnXv_djE8G6m4Ema9nJt7eb_M9HplNP8AF2176Q</recordid><startdate>199405</startdate><enddate>199405</enddate><creator>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creator><creator>Charles, Denys J.</creator><creator>Wood, Karl</creator><creator>Janick, Jules</creator><creator>Simon, James E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199405</creationdate><title>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</title><author>Ferreira, Jorge F. S. ; Charles, Denys J. ; Wood, Karl ; Janick, Jules ; Simon, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3546-19dc0d063c5ad7bc0c23597e550423d01eea753843fa841c6773219a0767a1f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Artemisinin</topic><topic>electrochemical detection</topic><topic>gas chromatography</topic><topic>high performance liquid chromatography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Denys J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janick, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phytochemical analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferreira, Jorge F. S.</au><au>Charles, Denys J.</au><au>Wood, Karl</au><au>Janick, Jules</au><au>Simon, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses</atitle><jtitle>Phytochemical analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Phytochem. Anal</addtitle><date>1994-05</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>116-120</pages><issn>0958-0344</issn><eissn>1099-1565</eissn><abstract>An improved method for high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC‐EC) is presented for artemisinin analysis. It involves increased concentration of organic phase, elimination of the degassing step in sample preparation, and reduced time for heating and degassing in mobile phase preparation and recycling. The HPLC‐EC method was compared to a gas chromatographic (GC) method, which measured artemisinin indirectly through two of its degradation products, labelled A and B. Both methods provided a good separation of artemisinin from artemisitene, arteannuin B, and the semisynthetic dihydroartemisinin. Peak B provided a higher correlation to the levels of artemisinin detected by HPLC‐EC. Peaks A, B and Z (a small peak preceding A and B) were identified through electron impact and chemical ionization spectra from GC‐mass spectral analysis.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/pca.2800050306</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-0344 |
ispartof | Phytochemical analysis, 1994-05, Vol.5 (3), p.116-120 |
issn | 0958-0344 1099-1565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pca_2800050306 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Artemisinin electrochemical detection gas chromatography high performance liquid chromatography |
title | A comparison of gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography for artemisinin analyses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T18%3A54%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20gas%20chromatography%20and%20high%20performance%20liquid%20chromatography%20for%20artemisinin%20analyses&rft.jtitle=Phytochemical%20analysis&rft.au=Ferreira,%20Jorge%20F.%20S.&rft.date=1994-05&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=116-120&rft.issn=0958-0344&rft.eissn=1099-1565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pca.2800050306&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_S6SN49WT_9%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |