On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio

On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio

For the evaluation of the double cantilever beam (DCB) test several approaches are applicable that can provide different results. This ambiguity can significantly affect numerical models which refer to experimentally obtained material parameters. In this work, different approaches for the test evalu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Linke, Max, Lammering, Rolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics
container_volume 22
creator Linke, Max
Lammering, Rolf
description For the evaluation of the double cantilever beam (DCB) test several approaches are applicable that can provide different results. This ambiguity can significantly affect numerical models which refer to experimentally obtained material parameters. In this work, different approaches for the test evaluation are presented. It is shown that equations derived from the beam theory give reasonable results and good agreement between experiments, numerical and analytical solutions. In this context, DCB tests of glass fibre reinforced polymer substrates with carbon nanotube enriched composites are conducted. A slight negative effect of the latter on the experimental results is found.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pamm.202200021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pamm_202200021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>PAMM202200021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-b040d5c211cb6b155620dd85c37a984b260cc52488c243b0cdaf3024fb5e648f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMvsPJJydxEnGquKjUqsygMQW2ZczMWqSyo5A-fc0FAEb093pnvcdHsauBcQCQN7sddvGEqSEwyVO2EwokUc5KHH6Zz9nFyG8TYRKYMZeth0fGuLYaK9xIO-CHlzf8d5y7BsK7p246w4Pq5ECN-MX3vY18RUPg9eu49SRfx25px3pQNxPDZfszOpdoKvvOWfPd7dPy4dovb1fLRfrCIUsRWQghTpDKQQaZUSWKQl1XWSY5LosUiMVIGYyLQqUaWIAa20TkKk1Gam0sMmcxcde9H0Inmy1967VfqwEVJOXavJS_Xg5BMpj4MPtaPyHrh4Xm81v9hObsGd-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Linke, Max ; Lammering, Rolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Linke, Max ; Lammering, Rolf</creatorcontrib><description>For the evaluation of the double cantilever beam (DCB) test several approaches are applicable that can provide different results. This ambiguity can significantly affect numerical models which refer to experimentally obtained material parameters. In this work, different approaches for the test evaluation are presented. It is shown that equations derived from the beam theory give reasonable results and good agreement between experiments, numerical and analytical solutions. In this context, DCB tests of glass fibre reinforced polymer substrates with carbon nanotube enriched composites are conducted. A slight negative effect of the latter on the experimental results is found.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-7061</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-7061</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pamm.202200021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley-VCH GmbH</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-b040d5c211cb6b155620dd85c37a984b260cc52488c243b0cdaf3024fb5e648f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpamm.202200021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpamm.202200021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linke, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammering, Rolf</creatorcontrib><title>On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio</title><title>Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics</title><description>For the evaluation of the double cantilever beam (DCB) test several approaches are applicable that can provide different results. This ambiguity can significantly affect numerical models which refer to experimentally obtained material parameters. In this work, different approaches for the test evaluation are presented. It is shown that equations derived from the beam theory give reasonable results and good agreement between experiments, numerical and analytical solutions. In this context, DCB tests of glass fibre reinforced polymer substrates with carbon nanotube enriched composites are conducted. A slight negative effect of the latter on the experimental results is found.</description><issn>1617-7061</issn><issn>1617-7061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwMvsPJJydxEnGquKjUqsygMQW2ZczMWqSyo5A-fc0FAEb093pnvcdHsauBcQCQN7sddvGEqSEwyVO2EwokUc5KHH6Zz9nFyG8TYRKYMZeth0fGuLYaK9xIO-CHlzf8d5y7BsK7p246w4Pq5ECN-MX3vY18RUPg9eu49SRfx25px3pQNxPDZfszOpdoKvvOWfPd7dPy4dovb1fLRfrCIUsRWQghTpDKQQaZUSWKQl1XWSY5LosUiMVIGYyLQqUaWIAa20TkKk1Gam0sMmcxcde9H0Inmy1967VfqwEVJOXavJS_Xg5BMpj4MPtaPyHrh4Xm81v9hObsGd-</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Linke, Max</creator><creator>Lammering, Rolf</creator><general>Wiley-VCH GmbH</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio</title><author>Linke, Max ; Lammering, Rolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-b040d5c211cb6b155620dd85c37a984b260cc52488c243b0cdaf3024fb5e648f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linke, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammering, Rolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linke, Max</au><au>Lammering, Rolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1617-7061</issn><eissn>1617-7061</eissn><abstract>For the evaluation of the double cantilever beam (DCB) test several approaches are applicable that can provide different results. This ambiguity can significantly affect numerical models which refer to experimentally obtained material parameters. In this work, different approaches for the test evaluation are presented. It is shown that equations derived from the beam theory give reasonable results and good agreement between experiments, numerical and analytical solutions. In this context, DCB tests of glass fibre reinforced polymer substrates with carbon nanotube enriched composites are conducted. A slight negative effect of the latter on the experimental results is found.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley-VCH GmbH</pub><doi>10.1002/pamm.202200021</doi><tpages>0</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-7061
ispartof Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics, 2023-03, Vol.22 (1), p.n/a
issn 1617-7061
1617-7061
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_pamm_202200021
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
title On the characterisation of cohesive interfaces by the mode I strain energy release ratio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A45%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20characterisation%20of%20cohesive%20interfaces%20by%20the%20mode%20I%20strain%20energy%20release%20ratio&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20in%20applied%20mathematics%20and%20mechanics&rft.au=Linke,%20Max&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1617-7061&rft.eissn=1617-7061&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pamm.202200021&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EPAMM202200021%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true