Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the interrater reliability for two instruments designed to measure the quality of nursing care. The two instruments tested were the Quality Patient Care Scale (QualPacs) and the Methodology for Monitoring Quality of Nursing Care (Rush...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in nursing & health 1980-03, Vol.3 (1), p.25-32
Hauptverfasser: Ventura, Marlene R., Hageman, Paul T., Slakter, Malcolm J., Fox, Richard N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Research in nursing & health
container_volume 3
creator Ventura, Marlene R.
Hageman, Paul T.
Slakter, Malcolm J.
Fox, Richard N.
description The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the interrater reliability for two instruments designed to measure the quality of nursing care. The two instruments tested were the Quality Patient Care Scale (QualPacs) and the Methodology for Monitoring Quality of Nursing Care (Rush‐Medicus instrument). The following minimal standards were proposed for evaluating the results of interrater reliability: (a) the ICC estimate obtained must have a value of at least .75, and (b) the 95% confidence interval should not include zero, in order to ensure that the obtained value differs from zero in a nonchance fashion. The results demonstrated that the QualPacs instrument did not meet these criteria in any instance for the six subscales and one total‐scale score for two sets of observers in two replications. The Rush‐Medicus instrument met the criteria in only 12 of 20 instances of testing (five of the six subscales for two sets of observers in two replications). The authors highly recommend the routine performance of interrater reliability testing using the ICC prior to and during data collection and acceptance of the minimal standards of empirical verification suggested previously.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nur.4770030106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nur_4770030106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_J41WGBRM_6</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-74edef897e2e66f677ac71ef84b2bf631b774693b4719048db0df6ce87c2f7643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePfcPLM7sls7uEYkCBjEhErw13aU11YXVdgny763BaDx5mUle3jfz8hi7ROghQHq12fqeIALIAEEesQ5CkSepgKdj1gGUkMi8wFN2FsILAGI_xQ4bTDat8V7Hwb2pnS5d7VpnAreN5-2u4Wujw9ZHobE8vghu88wr7Q1_3-po3Z-zE6vrYC6-d5ctbm8eh-Nk-jCaDAfTpIoRZELCrIzNCzKpkdJKIl0RRkWUaWllhiWRkEVWCsICRL4qYWVlZXKqUktSZF3WO9ytfBOCN1a9ebfWfq8Q1FcBKqZTvwVEoDgAO1eb_T9uNVvM_7DJgXWhNR8_rPavSlJGfbWcjdSdwOXoen6vZPYJdS1vMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ventura, Marlene R. ; Hageman, Paul T. ; Slakter, Malcolm J. ; Fox, Richard N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Marlene R. ; Hageman, Paul T. ; Slakter, Malcolm J. ; Fox, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><description>The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the interrater reliability for two instruments designed to measure the quality of nursing care. The two instruments tested were the Quality Patient Care Scale (QualPacs) and the Methodology for Monitoring Quality of Nursing Care (Rush‐Medicus instrument). The following minimal standards were proposed for evaluating the results of interrater reliability: (a) the ICC estimate obtained must have a value of at least .75, and (b) the 95% confidence interval should not include zero, in order to ensure that the obtained value differs from zero in a nonchance fashion. The results demonstrated that the QualPacs instrument did not meet these criteria in any instance for the six subscales and one total‐scale score for two sets of observers in two replications. The Rush‐Medicus instrument met the criteria in only 12 of 20 instances of testing (five of the six subscales for two sets of observers in two replications). The authors highly recommend the routine performance of interrater reliability testing using the ICC prior to and during data collection and acceptance of the minimal standards of empirical verification suggested previously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-6891</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-240X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770030106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Research in nursing &amp; health, 1980-03, Vol.3 (1), p.25-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1980 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-74edef897e2e66f677ac71ef84b2bf631b774693b4719048db0df6ce87c2f7643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-74edef897e2e66f677ac71ef84b2bf631b774693b4719048db0df6ce87c2f7643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnur.4770030106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnur.4770030106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Marlene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hageman, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slakter, Malcolm J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><title>Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality</title><title>Research in nursing &amp; health</title><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><description>The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the interrater reliability for two instruments designed to measure the quality of nursing care. The two instruments tested were the Quality Patient Care Scale (QualPacs) and the Methodology for Monitoring Quality of Nursing Care (Rush‐Medicus instrument). The following minimal standards were proposed for evaluating the results of interrater reliability: (a) the ICC estimate obtained must have a value of at least .75, and (b) the 95% confidence interval should not include zero, in order to ensure that the obtained value differs from zero in a nonchance fashion. The results demonstrated that the QualPacs instrument did not meet these criteria in any instance for the six subscales and one total‐scale score for two sets of observers in two replications. The Rush‐Medicus instrument met the criteria in only 12 of 20 instances of testing (five of the six subscales for two sets of observers in two replications). The authors highly recommend the routine performance of interrater reliability testing using the ICC prior to and during data collection and acceptance of the minimal standards of empirical verification suggested previously.</description><issn>0160-6891</issn><issn>1098-240X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFPAjEQhRujiYhePfcPLM7sls7uEYkCBjEhErw13aU11YXVdgny763BaDx5mUle3jfz8hi7ROghQHq12fqeIALIAEEesQ5CkSepgKdj1gGUkMi8wFN2FsILAGI_xQ4bTDat8V7Hwb2pnS5d7VpnAreN5-2u4Wujw9ZHobE8vghu88wr7Q1_3-po3Z-zE6vrYC6-d5ctbm8eh-Nk-jCaDAfTpIoRZELCrIzNCzKpkdJKIl0RRkWUaWllhiWRkEVWCsICRL4qYWVlZXKqUktSZF3WO9ytfBOCN1a9ebfWfq8Q1FcBKqZTvwVEoDgAO1eb_T9uNVvM_7DJgXWhNR8_rPavSlJGfbWcjdSdwOXoen6vZPYJdS1vMQ</recordid><startdate>198003</startdate><enddate>198003</enddate><creator>Ventura, Marlene R.</creator><creator>Hageman, Paul T.</creator><creator>Slakter, Malcolm J.</creator><creator>Fox, Richard N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198003</creationdate><title>Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality</title><author>Ventura, Marlene R. ; Hageman, Paul T. ; Slakter, Malcolm J. ; Fox, Richard N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2406-74edef897e2e66f677ac71ef84b2bf631b774693b4719048db0df6ce87c2f7643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ventura, Marlene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hageman, Paul T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slakter, Malcolm J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Richard N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in nursing &amp; health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ventura, Marlene R.</au><au>Hageman, Paul T.</au><au>Slakter, Malcolm J.</au><au>Fox, Richard N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality</atitle><jtitle>Research in nursing &amp; health</jtitle><addtitle>Res. Nurs. Health</addtitle><date>1980-03</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>25-32</pages><issn>0160-6891</issn><eissn>1098-240X</eissn><abstract>The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the interrater reliability for two instruments designed to measure the quality of nursing care. The two instruments tested were the Quality Patient Care Scale (QualPacs) and the Methodology for Monitoring Quality of Nursing Care (Rush‐Medicus instrument). The following minimal standards were proposed for evaluating the results of interrater reliability: (a) the ICC estimate obtained must have a value of at least .75, and (b) the 95% confidence interval should not include zero, in order to ensure that the obtained value differs from zero in a nonchance fashion. The results demonstrated that the QualPacs instrument did not meet these criteria in any instance for the six subscales and one total‐scale score for two sets of observers in two replications. The Rush‐Medicus instrument met the criteria in only 12 of 20 instances of testing (five of the six subscales for two sets of observers in two replications). The authors highly recommend the routine performance of interrater reliability testing using the ICC prior to and during data collection and acceptance of the minimal standards of empirical verification suggested previously.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/nur.4770030106</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-6891
ispartof Research in nursing & health, 1980-03, Vol.3 (1), p.25-32
issn 0160-6891
1098-240X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nur_4770030106
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Interrater reliabilities for two measures of nursing care quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interrater%20reliabilities%20for%20two%20measures%20of%20nursing%20care%20quality&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20nursing%20&%20health&rft.au=Ventura,%20Marlene%20R.&rft.date=1980-03&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=25-32&rft.issn=0160-6891&rft.eissn=1098-240X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nur.4770030106&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_J41WGBRM_6%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true