Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems
Five previously employed numerical methods for the solution of Orr–Sommerfeld problems have been compared to each other and to a new method, the differential method of near‐orthonormalized integration. Brief summaries of each method are included. The comparison, based on seven factors, reflects the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal for numerical methods in engineering 1972-03, Vol.4 (2), p.195-206 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 206 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 195 |
| container_title | International journal for numerical methods in engineering |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Gersting Jr, John M. Jankowski, Daniel F. |
| description | Five previously employed numerical methods for the solution of Orr–Sommerfeld problems have been compared to each other and to a new method, the differential method of near‐orthonormalized integration. Brief summaries of each method are included. The comparison, based on seven factors, reflects the results of an implementation of a computer program for each method for the classic Orr–Sommerfeld problem of plane Poiseuille flow. This comparison shows that the new method and the algebraic finite difference method are currently the best available numerical solution methods for the problems in this class, with the new method being less problem dependent. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nme.1620040206 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nme_1620040206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_TPFVJT72_C</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-c2ab9fffc884f09303ecd2d91d83f1b7e71dd8ce7543b9178b95514f67b0afc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01LxDAURYMoWEe3rvsHMr7XtE2ylDIzKmNHsOgytPnAamuHZETn31upKK5cvQvvnguHkHOEOQIkF6-9nWOeAKSQQH5AIgTJ6Zj5IYnGgqSZFHhMTkJ4BkDMgEWElm-99a2uu7i3u6fBhNgNPt54T--Hfnw525l464ems304JUeu7oI9-74zUi0XVXFF15vVdXG5ppqByKlO6kY657QQqQPJgFltEiPRCOaw4ZajMUJbnqWskchFI7MMU5fzBmqn2YzMp1nthxC8dWrr2772e4WgvlzV6Kp-XUdATsB729n9P21V3i7-sHRi27CzHz9s7V9UzhnP1GO5UtXd8uGm4okq2CdQCGcc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Gersting Jr, John M. ; Jankowski, Daniel F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gersting Jr, John M. ; Jankowski, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><description>Five previously employed numerical methods for the solution of Orr–Sommerfeld problems have been compared to each other and to a new method, the differential method of near‐orthonormalized integration. Brief summaries of each method are included. The comparison, based on seven factors, reflects the results of an implementation of a computer program for each method for the classic Orr–Sommerfeld problem of plane Poiseuille flow. This comparison shows that the new method and the algebraic finite difference method are currently the best available numerical solution methods for the problems in this class, with the new method being less problem dependent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620040206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><ispartof>International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 1972-03, Vol.4 (2), p.195-206</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1972 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-c2ab9fffc884f09303ecd2d91d83f1b7e71dd8ce7543b9178b95514f67b0afc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-c2ab9fffc884f09303ecd2d91d83f1b7e71dd8ce7543b9178b95514f67b0afc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnme.1620040206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnme.1620040206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gersting Jr, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankowski, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems</title><title>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</title><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng</addtitle><description>Five previously employed numerical methods for the solution of Orr–Sommerfeld problems have been compared to each other and to a new method, the differential method of near‐orthonormalized integration. Brief summaries of each method are included. The comparison, based on seven factors, reflects the results of an implementation of a computer program for each method for the classic Orr–Sommerfeld problem of plane Poiseuille flow. This comparison shows that the new method and the algebraic finite difference method are currently the best available numerical solution methods for the problems in this class, with the new method being less problem dependent.</description><issn>0029-5981</issn><issn>1097-0207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj01LxDAURYMoWEe3rvsHMr7XtE2ylDIzKmNHsOgytPnAamuHZETn31upKK5cvQvvnguHkHOEOQIkF6-9nWOeAKSQQH5AIgTJ6Zj5IYnGgqSZFHhMTkJ4BkDMgEWElm-99a2uu7i3u6fBhNgNPt54T--Hfnw525l464ems304JUeu7oI9-74zUi0XVXFF15vVdXG5ppqByKlO6kY657QQqQPJgFltEiPRCOaw4ZajMUJbnqWskchFI7MMU5fzBmqn2YzMp1nthxC8dWrr2772e4WgvlzV6Kp-XUdATsB729n9P21V3i7-sHRi27CzHz9s7V9UzhnP1GO5UtXd8uGm4okq2CdQCGcc</recordid><startdate>197203</startdate><enddate>197203</enddate><creator>Gersting Jr, John M.</creator><creator>Jankowski, Daniel F.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197203</creationdate><title>Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems</title><author>Gersting Jr, John M. ; Jankowski, Daniel F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3086-c2ab9fffc884f09303ecd2d91d83f1b7e71dd8ce7543b9178b95514f67b0afc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gersting Jr, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jankowski, Daniel F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gersting Jr, John M.</au><au>Jankowski, Daniel F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems</atitle><jtitle>International journal for numerical methods in engineering</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng</addtitle><date>1972-03</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>195-206</pages><issn>0029-5981</issn><eissn>1097-0207</eissn><abstract>Five previously employed numerical methods for the solution of Orr–Sommerfeld problems have been compared to each other and to a new method, the differential method of near‐orthonormalized integration. Brief summaries of each method are included. The comparison, based on seven factors, reflects the results of an implementation of a computer program for each method for the classic Orr–Sommerfeld problem of plane Poiseuille flow. This comparison shows that the new method and the algebraic finite difference method are currently the best available numerical solution methods for the problems in this class, with the new method being less problem dependent.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/nme.1620040206</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-5981 |
| ispartof | International journal for numerical methods in engineering, 1972-03, Vol.4 (2), p.195-206 |
| issn | 0029-5981 1097-0207 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nme_1620040206 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
| title | Numerical methods for Orr-Sommerfeld problems |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T21%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20methods%20for%20Orr-Sommerfeld%20problems&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20for%20numerical%20methods%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Gersting%20Jr,%20John%20M.&rft.date=1972-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=195-206&rft.issn=0029-5981&rft.eissn=1097-0207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nme.1620040206&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_TPFVJT72_C%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |