Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction

The present investigation comprises three methodological studies concerning vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. Vaginal pressure was measured by a balloon (6.7 ± 1.7 cm) connected by a catheter to a pressure transducer. The balloon was placed with the middle of the b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 1990, Vol.9 (5), p.479-487
Hauptverfasser: Bø, Kari, Kvarstein, Bernt, Hagen, Rolf R., Larsen, Stig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 487
container_issue 5
container_start_page 479
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 9
creator Bø, Kari
Kvarstein, Bernt
Hagen, Rolf R.
Larsen, Stig
description The present investigation comprises three methodological studies concerning vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. Vaginal pressure was measured by a balloon (6.7 ± 1.7 cm) connected by a catheter to a pressure transducer. The balloon was placed with the middle of the balloon 3.5 cm inside the introitus vagina. In fourty‐seven women, mean age 44.9 years (24–64), observation of movement of the vaginal catheter during PFM contraction verified 7 inconclusive results from perineovaginal palpation and was the most valid way to distinguish between correct and incorrect PFM contraction. Vaginal pressure rise was obtained regardless of correct or incorrect PFM contraction, showing that vaginal pressure is not specific for PFM contraction. However, as the action of the PFM is elevation, a simultaneous inward movement of the vaginal catheter is present only during correct PFM contraction. Degree of influence of various muscle groups on vaginal pressure was investigated in 14 women using two different balloons, one having a silicone reinforcement of the tip. It was found that the median contraction value of muscles other than the PFM did not exceed contraction of PFM alone. No significant difference was observed using the two types of balloons. In three physical therapists EMG activity of the lower m. rectus abdominis was recorded during maximal PFM contractions. A rise in EMG activity always occurred during maximal contractions even if the women actively tried to relax the abdominal muscles. It is concluded that vaginal pressure measurement of PFM strength is valid with simultaneous observation of inward movement of the balloon catheter. Vaginal pressure rise due to simultaneous contraction of other muscles is probably not larger than pressure rise due to intended PFM contraction. Reinforced balloon tip will not change pressure recording, and rise in EMG activity of lower abdominal muscles seems unavoidable during maximal PFM contraction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.1930090504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_1930090504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NAU1930090504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3064-87f70445d66635e20918c7191a974e254a1e1909146b0063a527ad800d64e29d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhSMEUpe21579B7KM48TecGsraFeqCoe2VFws40y6BseJbKd0fzb_AHu3AlVC4jTSm_e9edIUxQmFJQWo3jk1L2nLAFpooH5VLGhTQcmFEK-LBQjGyqrm4qB4G8J3AFixul0Uvz6jfTSa9HYcPRnmoC0SfEKvTUDSJy1ukESPKg7oIhl70uOgkikkMQQye-OU3xLj9Oiiceg0vifr9ZLcKWs6E7eZeVQPyWbJlJnZIxlQ5ZkzQzZM_6iRL7iHuCHKdbsaDnXCnyPDPE12F5DPDxg3Yxd2jXMRP9ps0qP3qONeUjqa0R0Vb3plAx4_z8Pi9uOHm_PL8urTxfr89KrUDHhdrkQvoK6bjnPOGqygpSstaEtVK2qsmlpRpG1Sa_4NgDPVVEJ1K4COp3XbscNiuc_VfgzBYy8nb4bUVVKQ-WEyPUz-fVgC2j3w01jc_sctr09vX7DlnjUh4tMfVvkfkgsmGvnl-kLew83ZWfX1Ut6x3zohsAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bø, Kari ; Kvarstein, Bernt ; Hagen, Rolf R. ; Larsen, Stig</creator><creatorcontrib>Bø, Kari ; Kvarstein, Bernt ; Hagen, Rolf R. ; Larsen, Stig</creatorcontrib><description>The present investigation comprises three methodological studies concerning vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. Vaginal pressure was measured by a balloon (6.7 ± 1.7 cm) connected by a catheter to a pressure transducer. The balloon was placed with the middle of the balloon 3.5 cm inside the introitus vagina. In fourty‐seven women, mean age 44.9 years (24–64), observation of movement of the vaginal catheter during PFM contraction verified 7 inconclusive results from perineovaginal palpation and was the most valid way to distinguish between correct and incorrect PFM contraction. Vaginal pressure rise was obtained regardless of correct or incorrect PFM contraction, showing that vaginal pressure is not specific for PFM contraction. However, as the action of the PFM is elevation, a simultaneous inward movement of the vaginal catheter is present only during correct PFM contraction. Degree of influence of various muscle groups on vaginal pressure was investigated in 14 women using two different balloons, one having a silicone reinforcement of the tip. It was found that the median contraction value of muscles other than the PFM did not exceed contraction of PFM alone. No significant difference was observed using the two types of balloons. In three physical therapists EMG activity of the lower m. rectus abdominis was recorded during maximal PFM contractions. A rise in EMG activity always occurred during maximal contractions even if the women actively tried to relax the abdominal muscles. It is concluded that vaginal pressure measurement of PFM strength is valid with simultaneous observation of inward movement of the balloon catheter. Vaginal pressure rise due to simultaneous contraction of other muscles is probably not larger than pressure rise due to intended PFM contraction. Reinforced balloon tip will not change pressure recording, and rise in EMG activity of lower abdominal muscles seems unavoidable during maximal PFM contraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930090504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>pelvic fluor muscles ; pressure transducer ; vaginal pressure</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 1990, Vol.9 (5), p.479-487</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1990 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3064-87f70445d66635e20918c7191a974e254a1e1909146b0063a527ad800d64e29d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3064-87f70445d66635e20918c7191a974e254a1e1909146b0063a527ad800d64e29d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.1930090504$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.1930090504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,4025,27925,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bø, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvarstein, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagen, Rolf R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Stig</creatorcontrib><title>Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><description>The present investigation comprises three methodological studies concerning vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. Vaginal pressure was measured by a balloon (6.7 ± 1.7 cm) connected by a catheter to a pressure transducer. The balloon was placed with the middle of the balloon 3.5 cm inside the introitus vagina. In fourty‐seven women, mean age 44.9 years (24–64), observation of movement of the vaginal catheter during PFM contraction verified 7 inconclusive results from perineovaginal palpation and was the most valid way to distinguish between correct and incorrect PFM contraction. Vaginal pressure rise was obtained regardless of correct or incorrect PFM contraction, showing that vaginal pressure is not specific for PFM contraction. However, as the action of the PFM is elevation, a simultaneous inward movement of the vaginal catheter is present only during correct PFM contraction. Degree of influence of various muscle groups on vaginal pressure was investigated in 14 women using two different balloons, one having a silicone reinforcement of the tip. It was found that the median contraction value of muscles other than the PFM did not exceed contraction of PFM alone. No significant difference was observed using the two types of balloons. In three physical therapists EMG activity of the lower m. rectus abdominis was recorded during maximal PFM contractions. A rise in EMG activity always occurred during maximal contractions even if the women actively tried to relax the abdominal muscles. It is concluded that vaginal pressure measurement of PFM strength is valid with simultaneous observation of inward movement of the balloon catheter. Vaginal pressure rise due to simultaneous contraction of other muscles is probably not larger than pressure rise due to intended PFM contraction. Reinforced balloon tip will not change pressure recording, and rise in EMG activity of lower abdominal muscles seems unavoidable during maximal PFM contraction.</description><subject>pelvic fluor muscles</subject><subject>pressure transducer</subject><subject>vaginal pressure</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhSMEUpe21579B7KM48TecGsraFeqCoe2VFws40y6BseJbKd0fzb_AHu3AlVC4jTSm_e9edIUxQmFJQWo3jk1L2nLAFpooH5VLGhTQcmFEK-LBQjGyqrm4qB4G8J3AFixul0Uvz6jfTSa9HYcPRnmoC0SfEKvTUDSJy1ukESPKg7oIhl70uOgkikkMQQye-OU3xLj9Oiiceg0vifr9ZLcKWs6E7eZeVQPyWbJlJnZIxlQ5ZkzQzZM_6iRL7iHuCHKdbsaDnXCnyPDPE12F5DPDxg3Yxd2jXMRP9ps0qP3qONeUjqa0R0Vb3plAx4_z8Pi9uOHm_PL8urTxfr89KrUDHhdrkQvoK6bjnPOGqygpSstaEtVK2qsmlpRpG1Sa_4NgDPVVEJ1K4COp3XbscNiuc_VfgzBYy8nb4bUVVKQ-WEyPUz-fVgC2j3w01jc_sctr09vX7DlnjUh4tMfVvkfkgsmGvnl-kLew83ZWfX1Ut6x3zohsAY</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>Bø, Kari</creator><creator>Kvarstein, Bernt</creator><creator>Hagen, Rolf R.</creator><creator>Larsen, Stig</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction</title><author>Bø, Kari ; Kvarstein, Bernt ; Hagen, Rolf R. ; Larsen, Stig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3064-87f70445d66635e20918c7191a974e254a1e1909146b0063a527ad800d64e29d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>pelvic fluor muscles</topic><topic>pressure transducer</topic><topic>vaginal pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bø, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvarstein, Bernt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagen, Rolf R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Stig</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bø, Kari</au><au>Kvarstein, Bernt</au><au>Hagen, Rolf R.</au><au>Larsen, Stig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>487</epage><pages>479-487</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>The present investigation comprises three methodological studies concerning vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength. Vaginal pressure was measured by a balloon (6.7 ± 1.7 cm) connected by a catheter to a pressure transducer. The balloon was placed with the middle of the balloon 3.5 cm inside the introitus vagina. In fourty‐seven women, mean age 44.9 years (24–64), observation of movement of the vaginal catheter during PFM contraction verified 7 inconclusive results from perineovaginal palpation and was the most valid way to distinguish between correct and incorrect PFM contraction. Vaginal pressure rise was obtained regardless of correct or incorrect PFM contraction, showing that vaginal pressure is not specific for PFM contraction. However, as the action of the PFM is elevation, a simultaneous inward movement of the vaginal catheter is present only during correct PFM contraction. Degree of influence of various muscle groups on vaginal pressure was investigated in 14 women using two different balloons, one having a silicone reinforcement of the tip. It was found that the median contraction value of muscles other than the PFM did not exceed contraction of PFM alone. No significant difference was observed using the two types of balloons. In three physical therapists EMG activity of the lower m. rectus abdominis was recorded during maximal PFM contractions. A rise in EMG activity always occurred during maximal contractions even if the women actively tried to relax the abdominal muscles. It is concluded that vaginal pressure measurement of PFM strength is valid with simultaneous observation of inward movement of the balloon catheter. Vaginal pressure rise due to simultaneous contraction of other muscles is probably not larger than pressure rise due to intended PFM contraction. Reinforced balloon tip will not change pressure recording, and rise in EMG activity of lower abdominal muscles seems unavoidable during maximal PFM contraction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/nau.1930090504</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 1990, Vol.9 (5), p.479-487
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_1930090504
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects pelvic fluor muscles
pressure transducer
vaginal pressure
title Pelvic floor muscle exercise for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: II. Validity of vaginal pressure measurements of pelvic floor muscle strength and the necessity of supplementary methods for control of correct contraction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T05%3A49%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pelvic%20floor%20muscle%20exercise%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20female%20stress%20urinary%20incontinence:%20II.%20Validity%20of%20vaginal%20pressure%20measurements%20of%20pelvic%20floor%20muscle%20strength%20and%20the%20necessity%20of%20supplementary%20methods%20for%20control%20of%20correct%20contraction&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=B%C3%B8,%20Kari&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=487&rft.pages=479-487&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.1930090504&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ENAU1930090504%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true