Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction

Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction

Controversy remains over which tests are necessary in the routine evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Is cystometry alone sufficient, or is a more detailed investigation such as videocystourethrography justified? Two hundred consecutive new patients attending for urodynamic ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 1989, Vol.8 (5), p.447-449
Hauptverfasser: Barnick, C. G., Cardozo, L. D., Benness, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
cystometry
incontinence
investigations
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 5
container_start_page 447
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 8
creator Barnick, C. G.
Cardozo, L. D.
Benness, C.
description Controversy remains over which tests are necessary in the routine evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Is cystometry alone sufficient, or is a more detailed investigation such as videocystourethrography justified? Two hundred consecutive new patients attending for urodynamic assessment were reviewed. In fifteen (7.5%) patients the correct diagnosis was made only on videocystourethrography. We therefore suggest that videocystourethrography should continue to be used as the routine investigation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.1930080504
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_1930080504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NAU1930080504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3254-11cbc8ce695ac9c67df5557f64a083372f4aadf3526ef4313c7c5faaf5d0f2ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUh4MoOKdXz_kHOtOmadajDDeFOVEcHsNb-uKitRlJutn_3o6J4snTu3zf48dHyGXKRilj2VUD7SgtOWNjJlh-RAapyFhSSCmPyYBJzpMsL-QpOQvhjfUUz8sBWS0DUmeod220DdKtrdDpLkTXeoxr7149bNYdtQ2Na6S4hbqFaF2zlwx-QI20djv0tPW2Ad_R6EFHWnXBtI3ek-fkxEAd8OL7DslyevM8uU3mD7O7yfU80TwTeZKmeqXHGotSgC51ISsjhJCmyKHfymVmcoDKcJEVaHKeci21MABGVMxkCHxIRoe_2rsQPBq18fajn6RSpvaFVF9I_RbqhfIg7GyN3T-0Wlwv_7jJwbUh4uePC_5dFZJLoV4WM_X4eD-dPMm5kvwLuIh84A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Barnick, C. G. ; Cardozo, L. D. ; Benness, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnick, C. G. ; Cardozo, L. D. ; Benness, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Controversy remains over which tests are necessary in the routine evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Is cystometry alone sufficient, or is a more detailed investigation such as videocystourethrography justified? Two hundred consecutive new patients attending for urodynamic assessment were reviewed. In fifteen (7.5%) patients the correct diagnosis was made only on videocystourethrography. We therefore suggest that videocystourethrography should continue to be used as the routine investigation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.1930080504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>cystometry ; incontinence ; investigations</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 1989, Vol.8 (5), p.447-449</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1989 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3254-11cbc8ce695ac9c67df5557f64a083372f4aadf3526ef4313c7c5faaf5d0f2ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3254-11cbc8ce695ac9c67df5557f64a083372f4aadf3526ef4313c7c5faaf5d0f2ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.1930080504$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.1930080504$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4022,27922,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnick, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benness, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><description>Controversy remains over which tests are necessary in the routine evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Is cystometry alone sufficient, or is a more detailed investigation such as videocystourethrography justified? Two hundred consecutive new patients attending for urodynamic assessment were reviewed. In fifteen (7.5%) patients the correct diagnosis was made only on videocystourethrography. We therefore suggest that videocystourethrography should continue to be used as the routine investigation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction.</description><subject>cystometry</subject><subject>incontinence</subject><subject>investigations</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUh4MoOKdXz_kHOtOmadajDDeFOVEcHsNb-uKitRlJutn_3o6J4snTu3zf48dHyGXKRilj2VUD7SgtOWNjJlh-RAapyFhSSCmPyYBJzpMsL-QpOQvhjfUUz8sBWS0DUmeod220DdKtrdDpLkTXeoxr7149bNYdtQ2Na6S4hbqFaF2zlwx-QI20djv0tPW2Ad_R6EFHWnXBtI3ek-fkxEAd8OL7DslyevM8uU3mD7O7yfU80TwTeZKmeqXHGotSgC51ISsjhJCmyKHfymVmcoDKcJEVaHKeci21MABGVMxkCHxIRoe_2rsQPBq18fajn6RSpvaFVF9I_RbqhfIg7GyN3T-0Wlwv_7jJwbUh4uePC_5dFZJLoV4WM_X4eD-dPMm5kvwLuIh84A</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Barnick, C. G.</creator><creator>Cardozo, L. D.</creator><creator>Benness, C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction</title><author>Barnick, C. G. ; Cardozo, L. D. ; Benness, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3254-11cbc8ce695ac9c67df5557f64a083372f4aadf3526ef4313c7c5faaf5d0f2ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>cystometry</topic><topic>incontinence</topic><topic>investigations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnick, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, L. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benness, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnick, C. G.</au><au>Cardozo, L. D.</au><au>Benness, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodyn</addtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>447-449</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Controversy remains over which tests are necessary in the routine evaluation of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Is cystometry alone sufficient, or is a more detailed investigation such as videocystourethrography justified? Two hundred consecutive new patients attending for urodynamic assessment were reviewed. In fifteen (7.5%) patients the correct diagnosis was made only on videocystourethrography. We therefore suggest that videocystourethrography should continue to be used as the routine investigation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/nau.1930080504</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 1989, Vol.8 (5), p.447-449
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nau_1930080504
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects cystometry
incontinence
investigations
title Use of routine videocystourethrography in the evaluation of female lower urinary tract dysfunction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A54%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20routine%20videocystourethrography%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20female%20lower%20urinary%20tract%20dysfunction&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Barnick,%20C.%20G.&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=447-449&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.1930080504&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ENAU1930080504%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true