Evidence for a male bias in Atlantic blue crab pot‐based sampling

Objective The Atlantic blue crab Callinectes sapidus (hereafter, “blue crab”) is an ecologically and economically important species that supports one of the highest valued commercial fisheries in coastal South Carolina, USA. Researchers at the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources conduct multiple surveys to monitor the status of the blue crab by using a variety of gear configurations. Demographic characterizations can often be influenced by sampling gear‐related biases. Methods We compared blue crab sex ratios between passive, pot‐based sampling and active, trawl‐based sampling in the fall across three estuaries and for year‐round sampling in a single estuary (Ashley River, South Carolina). Result During the fall, there was a difference of 20.1% between the percentage of males collected in pot‐based sampling (73.5%) and the percentage of males in trawl‐based sampling (53.4%). Furthermore, an overall male bias of 23.0% was observed for year‐round sampling in the Ashley River; however, this bias was only significant in certain months. Conclusion Our findings suggest that although particular sampling gears may have specific advantages, such as greater suitability to effectively sample certain habitats, the resulting characterizations of blue crab population demographics can differ among gear types. Recognizing gear‐related biases is important for ensuring that field surveys are representative of population demographics, particularly when sex‐specific modeling approaches are used as part of stock assessments to determine population status. Impact statement In this study, we found that fisheries‐independent, pot‐based sampling produced blue crab catches that in many cases were significantly biased toward males when compared to catches from trawl‐based sampling. This finding has implications for sex‐specific stock assessments of blue crabs using fisheries‐independent data.