Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho
Because of their long‐term listing under the Endangered Species Act, much interest has been placed on estimating population vital rates for Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus, but the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the interannual variability in those vital rates have rarely been evaluated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | North American journal of fisheries management 2021-04, Vol.41 (2), p.455-465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 465 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | North American journal of fisheries management |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Roth, Curtis J. Stark, Eric J. Koenig, Lucas D. Ayers, Brian S. Meyer, Kevin A. |
description | Because of their long‐term listing under the Endangered Species Act, much interest has been placed on estimating population vital rates for Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus, but the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the interannual variability in those vital rates have rarely been evaluated. We used mark–recapture data to estimate fish growth, survival, and trends in abundance for fluvial adult Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Over an 8‐year period, a total of 1,205 individual Bull Trout were collected at a weir on the East Fork Salmon River (29 km upstream of its confluence with the Salmon River) during June–September, of which 420 were recaptures from prior years. Bull Trout varied in length from 215 to 756 mm and achieved a slightly larger asymptotic length and a slightly lower rate of growth relative to other fluvial and adfluvial Bull Trout populations. Apparent survival averaged 0.42 across all years, which was similar to previous studies estimating apparent survival for Bull Trout. The number of emigrating anadromous salmonid smolts in the upper Salmon River basin positively influenced East Fork Salmon River Bull Trout growth and survival, and survival was higher in years with lower annual discharge. Assessment of population growth via linear regression analysis indicated that the Bull Trout population was increasing during the study period (λ = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.14). Our findings highlight the ecological link between the abundance of wild and hatchery Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Sockeye Salmon O. nerka, and steelhead O. mykiss smolts and growth and survival of adult Bull Trout in systems where these species occur in sympatry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nafm.10545 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nafm_10545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>NAFM10545</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2735-603ba22d069062f8450cf4294183a6b3538fca7c9a949be56dab5fbd819f1b4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8As8IwK245fYYyktVCofgrKwRM-JrQaSuLJTUP89LWVmuu9K593hEHLO2RVnTFx36NrtBRIOyICDVInKcjgkAyZySEDL_JicxPjBGAMFYkDen_1q3WBf-47ebjps6zJS7Cq6sO3KB2zoItiuitQ7erNudtWve1p3tF9aOsHY06kPn_QVm3Y78VJ_2XBJZxUu_Sk5cthEe_aXQ_I2nSzG98n86W42Hs2TUuQpJBlLDQpRsUyzTDglgZVOCi25SjEzKaTKlZiXGrXUxkJWoQFnKsW140aadEgu9rtl8DEG64pVqFsMm4KzYmel2Fkpfq1sYb6Hv-vGbv4hi8fR9GH_8wP8F2Rm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Roth, Curtis J. ; Stark, Eric J. ; Koenig, Lucas D. ; Ayers, Brian S. ; Meyer, Kevin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roth, Curtis J. ; Stark, Eric J. ; Koenig, Lucas D. ; Ayers, Brian S. ; Meyer, Kevin A.</creatorcontrib><description>Because of their long‐term listing under the Endangered Species Act, much interest has been placed on estimating population vital rates for Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus, but the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the interannual variability in those vital rates have rarely been evaluated. We used mark–recapture data to estimate fish growth, survival, and trends in abundance for fluvial adult Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Over an 8‐year period, a total of 1,205 individual Bull Trout were collected at a weir on the East Fork Salmon River (29 km upstream of its confluence with the Salmon River) during June–September, of which 420 were recaptures from prior years. Bull Trout varied in length from 215 to 756 mm and achieved a slightly larger asymptotic length and a slightly lower rate of growth relative to other fluvial and adfluvial Bull Trout populations. Apparent survival averaged 0.42 across all years, which was similar to previous studies estimating apparent survival for Bull Trout. The number of emigrating anadromous salmonid smolts in the upper Salmon River basin positively influenced East Fork Salmon River Bull Trout growth and survival, and survival was higher in years with lower annual discharge. Assessment of population growth via linear regression analysis indicated that the Bull Trout population was increasing during the study period (λ = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.14). Our findings highlight the ecological link between the abundance of wild and hatchery Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Sockeye Salmon O. nerka, and steelhead O. mykiss smolts and growth and survival of adult Bull Trout in systems where these species occur in sympatry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10545</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 2021-04, Vol.41 (2), p.455-465</ispartof><rights>2020 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2735-603ba22d069062f8450cf4294183a6b3538fca7c9a949be56dab5fbd819f1b4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2735-603ba22d069062f8450cf4294183a6b3538fca7c9a949be56dab5fbd819f1b4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5684-5430</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnafm.10545$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnafm.10545$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roth, Curtis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lucas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Kevin A.</creatorcontrib><title>Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>Because of their long‐term listing under the Endangered Species Act, much interest has been placed on estimating population vital rates for Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus, but the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the interannual variability in those vital rates have rarely been evaluated. We used mark–recapture data to estimate fish growth, survival, and trends in abundance for fluvial adult Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Over an 8‐year period, a total of 1,205 individual Bull Trout were collected at a weir on the East Fork Salmon River (29 km upstream of its confluence with the Salmon River) during June–September, of which 420 were recaptures from prior years. Bull Trout varied in length from 215 to 756 mm and achieved a slightly larger asymptotic length and a slightly lower rate of growth relative to other fluvial and adfluvial Bull Trout populations. Apparent survival averaged 0.42 across all years, which was similar to previous studies estimating apparent survival for Bull Trout. The number of emigrating anadromous salmonid smolts in the upper Salmon River basin positively influenced East Fork Salmon River Bull Trout growth and survival, and survival was higher in years with lower annual discharge. Assessment of population growth via linear regression analysis indicated that the Bull Trout population was increasing during the study period (λ = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.14). Our findings highlight the ecological link between the abundance of wild and hatchery Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Sockeye Salmon O. nerka, and steelhead O. mykiss smolts and growth and survival of adult Bull Trout in systems where these species occur in sympatry.</description><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqWw8As8IwK245fYYyktVCofgrKwRM-JrQaSuLJTUP89LWVmuu9K593hEHLO2RVnTFx36NrtBRIOyICDVInKcjgkAyZySEDL_JicxPjBGAMFYkDen_1q3WBf-47ebjps6zJS7Cq6sO3KB2zoItiuitQ7erNudtWve1p3tF9aOsHY06kPn_QVm3Y78VJ_2XBJZxUu_Sk5cthEe_aXQ_I2nSzG98n86W42Hs2TUuQpJBlLDQpRsUyzTDglgZVOCi25SjEzKaTKlZiXGrXUxkJWoQFnKsW140aadEgu9rtl8DEG64pVqFsMm4KzYmel2Fkpfq1sYb6Hv-vGbv4hi8fR9GH_8wP8F2Rm</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Roth, Curtis J.</creator><creator>Stark, Eric J.</creator><creator>Koenig, Lucas D.</creator><creator>Ayers, Brian S.</creator><creator>Meyer, Kevin A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-5430</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho</title><author>Roth, Curtis J. ; Stark, Eric J. ; Koenig, Lucas D. ; Ayers, Brian S. ; Meyer, Kevin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2735-603ba22d069062f8450cf4294183a6b3538fca7c9a949be56dab5fbd819f1b4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roth, Curtis J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stark, Eric J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Lucas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Brian S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Kevin A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roth, Curtis J.</au><au>Stark, Eric J.</au><au>Koenig, Lucas D.</au><au>Ayers, Brian S.</au><au>Meyer, Kevin A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>465</epage><pages>455-465</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>Because of their long‐term listing under the Endangered Species Act, much interest has been placed on estimating population vital rates for Bull Trout Salvelinus confluentus, but the biotic and abiotic factors that influence the interannual variability in those vital rates have rarely been evaluated. We used mark–recapture data to estimate fish growth, survival, and trends in abundance for fluvial adult Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho. Over an 8‐year period, a total of 1,205 individual Bull Trout were collected at a weir on the East Fork Salmon River (29 km upstream of its confluence with the Salmon River) during June–September, of which 420 were recaptures from prior years. Bull Trout varied in length from 215 to 756 mm and achieved a slightly larger asymptotic length and a slightly lower rate of growth relative to other fluvial and adfluvial Bull Trout populations. Apparent survival averaged 0.42 across all years, which was similar to previous studies estimating apparent survival for Bull Trout. The number of emigrating anadromous salmonid smolts in the upper Salmon River basin positively influenced East Fork Salmon River Bull Trout growth and survival, and survival was higher in years with lower annual discharge. Assessment of population growth via linear regression analysis indicated that the Bull Trout population was increasing during the study period (λ = 1.08; 95% confidence interval = 1.03–1.14). Our findings highlight the ecological link between the abundance of wild and hatchery Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Sockeye Salmon O. nerka, and steelhead O. mykiss smolts and growth and survival of adult Bull Trout in systems where these species occur in sympatry.</abstract><doi>10.1002/nafm.10545</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5684-5430</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-5947 |
ispartof | North American journal of fisheries management, 2021-04, Vol.41 (2), p.455-465 |
issn | 0275-5947 1548-8675 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_nafm_10545 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
title | Population Dynamics and Temporal Trends of Bull Trout in the East Fork Salmon River, Idaho |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Population%20Dynamics%20and%20Temporal%20Trends%20of%20Bull%20Trout%20in%20the%20East%20Fork%20Salmon%20River,%20Idaho&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Roth,%20Curtis%20J.&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=465&rft.pages=455-465&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nafm.10545&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ENAFM10545%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |