Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma

Purpose To estimate the risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction due to standard fractionated (SF) and moderately hypofractionated (HF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate carcinoma. Methods Twelve patients with low or intermediate‐risk of prostate cancer referred for external‐b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2020-07, Vol.47 (7), p.2805-2813
Hauptverfasser: Mazonakis, Michalis, Kachris, Stefanos, Damilakis, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2813
container_issue 7
container_start_page 2805
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 47
creator Mazonakis, Michalis
Kachris, Stefanos
Damilakis, John
description Purpose To estimate the risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction due to standard fractionated (SF) and moderately hypofractionated (HF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate carcinoma. Methods Twelve patients with low or intermediate‐risk of prostate cancer referred for external‐beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Three computed tomography‐based VMAT plans were created for each study participant. The first plan was generated by assuming patient’s irradiation with SF‐VMAT (78 Gy in 39 fractions). The second and third plans were created on the basis of two different HF schedules (HF‐VMAT1: 70 Gy in 30 fractions, HF:VMAT2: 60 Gy in 20 fractions). Data from differential dose‐volume histograms obtained by the above treatment plans were employed to calculate the organ equivalent dose (OED) of the bladder and rectum with the aid of a nonlinear model accounting for fractionation and proliferation effects. The calculated OED values were used to estimate the average lifetime attributable risk (LARav) for the appearance of radiotherapy‐induced secondary bladder and rectal malignancies. The lifetime risk of radiation carcinogenesis was compared with the respective organ‐, and age‐dependent lifetime intrinsic risk (LIR) of cancer development for unexposed males. Results The average OED of the rectum from SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 for prostate cancer was 972.0, 900.2, and 815.7 cGy, respectively. The corresponding values for bladder were 73.4, 72.3, and 71.0 cGy. The LARav for rectal cancer induction varied from 0.06% to 0.4% by the fractionation schedule used for irradiation and by the age of the patient at the time of treatment. The corresponding risk range related to the development of secondary bladder malignancies was 0.06–0.33%. The SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 led to an increase of the lifetime rectal cancer risk with respect to LIR by 2.2–9.8%, 2.0–9.1% and 1.8–8.2%, respectively, depending upon the patient’s age. The corresponding elevation for bladder cancer induction was up to 8.0%, 7.9% and 7.7%. Conclusions The use of VMAT for prostate carcinoma leads to a noteworthy increase of the lifetime risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction compared to that of unexposed people irrespective of the patient’s age at the time of treatment and the applied fractionation scheme. The cancer risk data presented in this study may be taken into account by radiation oncologists and medical physicists in the selection of the optimal radia
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mp.14169
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_14169</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP14169</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4359-8b52a11140290a67ae55f449359389949ab33624f76b7e180cd2a7f39e30f1b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotl7AJ5As3Uw9uUymWZbiDVoUrG6HTC46OjeSkTIv4TObtiq4cBWS_8t3kh-hMwITAkAv625COBFyD40pz1jCKch9NAaQPKEc0hE6CuENAARL4RCNGKVCyEyO0eej1W1jlB9wUSljrMeqMdhb3asKa9XoeOLL8I5t6Mta9TZg11ZVuy6bFxx6tblrsPNK92XbxNxsBXUbVXFXDfh16No_-fNytooSjzvfRkNv4xyvy6at1Qk6cKoK9vR7PUZP11er-W2yuL-5m88WieYslcm0SKkihHCgEpTIlE1Tx7mMGZtKyaUqGBOUu0wUmSVT0IaqzDFpGThSCHaMLnZeHZ8QvHV55-Pv_JATyDeV5nWXbyuN6PkO7T6K2ppf8KfDCCQ7YF1WdvhXlC8fdsIv4zyB3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mazonakis, Michalis ; Kachris, Stefanos ; Damilakis, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Mazonakis, Michalis ; Kachris, Stefanos ; Damilakis, John</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To estimate the risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction due to standard fractionated (SF) and moderately hypofractionated (HF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate carcinoma. Methods Twelve patients with low or intermediate‐risk of prostate cancer referred for external‐beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Three computed tomography‐based VMAT plans were created for each study participant. The first plan was generated by assuming patient’s irradiation with SF‐VMAT (78 Gy in 39 fractions). The second and third plans were created on the basis of two different HF schedules (HF‐VMAT1: 70 Gy in 30 fractions, HF:VMAT2: 60 Gy in 20 fractions). Data from differential dose‐volume histograms obtained by the above treatment plans were employed to calculate the organ equivalent dose (OED) of the bladder and rectum with the aid of a nonlinear model accounting for fractionation and proliferation effects. The calculated OED values were used to estimate the average lifetime attributable risk (LARav) for the appearance of radiotherapy‐induced secondary bladder and rectal malignancies. The lifetime risk of radiation carcinogenesis was compared with the respective organ‐, and age‐dependent lifetime intrinsic risk (LIR) of cancer development for unexposed males. Results The average OED of the rectum from SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 for prostate cancer was 972.0, 900.2, and 815.7 cGy, respectively. The corresponding values for bladder were 73.4, 72.3, and 71.0 cGy. The LARav for rectal cancer induction varied from 0.06% to 0.4% by the fractionation schedule used for irradiation and by the age of the patient at the time of treatment. The corresponding risk range related to the development of secondary bladder malignancies was 0.06–0.33%. The SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 led to an increase of the lifetime rectal cancer risk with respect to LIR by 2.2–9.8%, 2.0–9.1% and 1.8–8.2%, respectively, depending upon the patient’s age. The corresponding elevation for bladder cancer induction was up to 8.0%, 7.9% and 7.7%. Conclusions The use of VMAT for prostate carcinoma leads to a noteworthy increase of the lifetime risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction compared to that of unexposed people irrespective of the patient’s age at the time of treatment and the applied fractionation scheme. The cancer risk data presented in this study may be taken into account by radiation oncologists and medical physicists in the selection of the optimal radiation therapy plan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mp.14169</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32266979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Carcinoma ; Humans ; hypofractionation ; Male ; prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - adverse effects ; Rectal Neoplasms ; second cancer risk ; Urinary Bladder ; VMAT</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2020-07, Vol.47 (7), p.2805-2813</ispartof><rights>2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2020 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4359-8b52a11140290a67ae55f449359389949ab33624f76b7e180cd2a7f39e30f1b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4359-8b52a11140290a67ae55f449359389949ab33624f76b7e180cd2a7f39e30f1b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmp.14169$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmp.14169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266979$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mazonakis, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachris, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damilakis, John</creatorcontrib><title>Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose To estimate the risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction due to standard fractionated (SF) and moderately hypofractionated (HF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate carcinoma. Methods Twelve patients with low or intermediate‐risk of prostate cancer referred for external‐beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Three computed tomography‐based VMAT plans were created for each study participant. The first plan was generated by assuming patient’s irradiation with SF‐VMAT (78 Gy in 39 fractions). The second and third plans were created on the basis of two different HF schedules (HF‐VMAT1: 70 Gy in 30 fractions, HF:VMAT2: 60 Gy in 20 fractions). Data from differential dose‐volume histograms obtained by the above treatment plans were employed to calculate the organ equivalent dose (OED) of the bladder and rectum with the aid of a nonlinear model accounting for fractionation and proliferation effects. The calculated OED values were used to estimate the average lifetime attributable risk (LARav) for the appearance of radiotherapy‐induced secondary bladder and rectal malignancies. The lifetime risk of radiation carcinogenesis was compared with the respective organ‐, and age‐dependent lifetime intrinsic risk (LIR) of cancer development for unexposed males. Results The average OED of the rectum from SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 for prostate cancer was 972.0, 900.2, and 815.7 cGy, respectively. The corresponding values for bladder were 73.4, 72.3, and 71.0 cGy. The LARav for rectal cancer induction varied from 0.06% to 0.4% by the fractionation schedule used for irradiation and by the age of the patient at the time of treatment. The corresponding risk range related to the development of secondary bladder malignancies was 0.06–0.33%. The SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 led to an increase of the lifetime rectal cancer risk with respect to LIR by 2.2–9.8%, 2.0–9.1% and 1.8–8.2%, respectively, depending upon the patient’s age. The corresponding elevation for bladder cancer induction was up to 8.0%, 7.9% and 7.7%. Conclusions The use of VMAT for prostate carcinoma leads to a noteworthy increase of the lifetime risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction compared to that of unexposed people irrespective of the patient’s age at the time of treatment and the applied fractionation scheme. The cancer risk data presented in this study may be taken into account by radiation oncologists and medical physicists in the selection of the optimal radiation therapy plan.</description><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hypofractionation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - adverse effects</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms</subject><subject>second cancer risk</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder</subject><subject>VMAT</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMotl7AJ5As3Uw9uUymWZbiDVoUrG6HTC46OjeSkTIv4TObtiq4cBWS_8t3kh-hMwITAkAv625COBFyD40pz1jCKch9NAaQPKEc0hE6CuENAARL4RCNGKVCyEyO0eej1W1jlB9wUSljrMeqMdhb3asKa9XoeOLL8I5t6Mta9TZg11ZVuy6bFxx6tblrsPNK92XbxNxsBXUbVXFXDfh16No_-fNytooSjzvfRkNv4xyvy6at1Qk6cKoK9vR7PUZP11er-W2yuL-5m88WieYslcm0SKkihHCgEpTIlE1Tx7mMGZtKyaUqGBOUu0wUmSVT0IaqzDFpGThSCHaMLnZeHZ8QvHV55-Pv_JATyDeV5nWXbyuN6PkO7T6K2ppf8KfDCCQ7YF1WdvhXlC8fdsIv4zyB3A</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Mazonakis, Michalis</creator><creator>Kachris, Stefanos</creator><creator>Damilakis, John</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma</title><author>Mazonakis, Michalis ; Kachris, Stefanos ; Damilakis, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4359-8b52a11140290a67ae55f449359389949ab33624f76b7e180cd2a7f39e30f1b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hypofractionation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - adverse effects</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms</topic><topic>second cancer risk</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder</topic><topic>VMAT</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mazonakis, Michalis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachris, Stefanos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damilakis, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mazonakis, Michalis</au><au>Kachris, Stefanos</au><au>Damilakis, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>2805</spage><epage>2813</epage><pages>2805-2813</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose To estimate the risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction due to standard fractionated (SF) and moderately hypofractionated (HF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate carcinoma. Methods Twelve patients with low or intermediate‐risk of prostate cancer referred for external‐beam radiotherapy were included in this study. Three computed tomography‐based VMAT plans were created for each study participant. The first plan was generated by assuming patient’s irradiation with SF‐VMAT (78 Gy in 39 fractions). The second and third plans were created on the basis of two different HF schedules (HF‐VMAT1: 70 Gy in 30 fractions, HF:VMAT2: 60 Gy in 20 fractions). Data from differential dose‐volume histograms obtained by the above treatment plans were employed to calculate the organ equivalent dose (OED) of the bladder and rectum with the aid of a nonlinear model accounting for fractionation and proliferation effects. The calculated OED values were used to estimate the average lifetime attributable risk (LARav) for the appearance of radiotherapy‐induced secondary bladder and rectal malignancies. The lifetime risk of radiation carcinogenesis was compared with the respective organ‐, and age‐dependent lifetime intrinsic risk (LIR) of cancer development for unexposed males. Results The average OED of the rectum from SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 for prostate cancer was 972.0, 900.2, and 815.7 cGy, respectively. The corresponding values for bladder were 73.4, 72.3, and 71.0 cGy. The LARav for rectal cancer induction varied from 0.06% to 0.4% by the fractionation schedule used for irradiation and by the age of the patient at the time of treatment. The corresponding risk range related to the development of secondary bladder malignancies was 0.06–0.33%. The SF‐VMAT, HF‐VMAT1 and HF‐VMAT2 led to an increase of the lifetime rectal cancer risk with respect to LIR by 2.2–9.8%, 2.0–9.1% and 1.8–8.2%, respectively, depending upon the patient’s age. The corresponding elevation for bladder cancer induction was up to 8.0%, 7.9% and 7.7%. Conclusions The use of VMAT for prostate carcinoma leads to a noteworthy increase of the lifetime risk for bladder and rectal cancer induction compared to that of unexposed people irrespective of the patient’s age at the time of treatment and the applied fractionation scheme. The cancer risk data presented in this study may be taken into account by radiation oncologists and medical physicists in the selection of the optimal radiation therapy plan.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>32266979</pmid><doi>10.1002/mp.14169</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2020-07, Vol.47 (7), p.2805-2813
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_14169
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Carcinoma
Humans
hypofractionation
Male
prostate cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - adverse effects
Rectal Neoplasms
second cancer risk
Urinary Bladder
VMAT
title Secondary bladder and rectal cancer risk estimates following standard fractionated and moderately hypofractionated VMAT for prostate carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Secondary%20bladder%20and%20rectal%20cancer%20risk%20estimates%20following%20standard%20fractionated%20and%20moderately%20hypofractionated%20VMAT%20for%20prostate%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Mazonakis,%20Michalis&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=2805&rft.epage=2813&rft.pages=2805-2813&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mp.14169&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP14169%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32266979&rfr_iscdi=true