Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as osimertinib and gefitinib, aumolertinib have been widely used in EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the discrepancy of pharmacokinetic features and distributions in imp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:MedComm - Oncology 2024-12, Vol.3 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Ren, Ran, Zhang, Jiangang, He, Yongpeng, Zeng, Xianghua, Zhou, Yu, Shen, Luyao, Li, Yongsheng, Li, Dairong, Zhao, Huakan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title MedComm - Oncology
container_volume 3
creator Ren, Ran
Zhang, Jiangang
He, Yongpeng
Zeng, Xianghua
Zhou, Yu
Shen, Luyao
Li, Yongsheng
Li, Dairong
Zhao, Huakan
description The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as osimertinib and gefitinib, aumolertinib have been widely used in EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the discrepancy of pharmacokinetic features and distributions in important tissues between these EGFR‐TKIs remains obscure. In this study, an ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS/MS) method with specificity and accuracy was established. After a single equivalent dose ratio or equal dose gavage, aumolertinib displayed the shortest elimination half‐life time ( t 1/2 ), while it showed the largest area under the concentration–time curve in mouse plasma and bone marrow among these 3 EGFR‐TKIs. Furthermore, at the time of reaching maximum concentration ( t max ) after single equivalent dose ratio gavage, the concentrations of aumolertinib were significantly higher than that of osimertinib and gefitinib in 9 important tissues of mice. Moreover, after single oral administration, aumolertinib displayed the highest concentration in plasma samples from EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC patients. Collectively, our findings manifest that the bioavailability and tissue distribution features of aumolertinib are superior to those of osimertinib and gefitinib, providing a pharmacokinetic basis for the clinical application of aumolertinib and the development of next‐generation EGFR‐TKIs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mog2.70002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_70002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_mog2_70002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_700023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj0FLw0AQRhexYNFe-gvmLLZuktLUc1A8iBT0vkzTSTs1uxN2tgeP_nOTIOLVyzdv4F2eMfPMLjNr83svh3xZ2h4vzDQv1w-L9Wq1ufzDV2amehqMTVnkZTE1X9sjRo-1fHCgxLVCLb7DyCoBpAE8e2kpJg68uwNR9r_PgRoeETDsIR2JI3g8Sb-UcCctJ1LgAF7OSv3uqR3V17fqpYIOE1NIemMmDbZKs597bW6fHt-r50UdRTVS47rIHuOny6wbOt3Q6cbO4l_yN3ocXCI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ren, Ran ; Zhang, Jiangang ; He, Yongpeng ; Zeng, Xianghua ; Zhou, Yu ; Shen, Luyao ; Li, Yongsheng ; Li, Dairong ; Zhao, Huakan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ran ; Zhang, Jiangang ; He, Yongpeng ; Zeng, Xianghua ; Zhou, Yu ; Shen, Luyao ; Li, Yongsheng ; Li, Dairong ; Zhao, Huakan</creatorcontrib><description>The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as osimertinib and gefitinib, aumolertinib have been widely used in EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the discrepancy of pharmacokinetic features and distributions in important tissues between these EGFR‐TKIs remains obscure. In this study, an ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS/MS) method with specificity and accuracy was established. After a single equivalent dose ratio or equal dose gavage, aumolertinib displayed the shortest elimination half‐life time ( t 1/2 ), while it showed the largest area under the concentration–time curve in mouse plasma and bone marrow among these 3 EGFR‐TKIs. Furthermore, at the time of reaching maximum concentration ( t max ) after single equivalent dose ratio gavage, the concentrations of aumolertinib were significantly higher than that of osimertinib and gefitinib in 9 important tissues of mice. Moreover, after single oral administration, aumolertinib displayed the highest concentration in plasma samples from EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC patients. Collectively, our findings manifest that the bioavailability and tissue distribution features of aumolertinib are superior to those of osimertinib and gefitinib, providing a pharmacokinetic basis for the clinical application of aumolertinib and the development of next‐generation EGFR‐TKIs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2769-6448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2769-6448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mog2.70002</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>MedComm - Oncology, 2024-12, Vol.3 (4)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_700023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2501-4594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yongpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Luyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dairong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huakan</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients</title><title>MedComm - Oncology</title><description>The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as osimertinib and gefitinib, aumolertinib have been widely used in EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the discrepancy of pharmacokinetic features and distributions in important tissues between these EGFR‐TKIs remains obscure. In this study, an ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS/MS) method with specificity and accuracy was established. After a single equivalent dose ratio or equal dose gavage, aumolertinib displayed the shortest elimination half‐life time ( t 1/2 ), while it showed the largest area under the concentration–time curve in mouse plasma and bone marrow among these 3 EGFR‐TKIs. Furthermore, at the time of reaching maximum concentration ( t max ) after single equivalent dose ratio gavage, the concentrations of aumolertinib were significantly higher than that of osimertinib and gefitinib in 9 important tissues of mice. Moreover, after single oral administration, aumolertinib displayed the highest concentration in plasma samples from EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC patients. Collectively, our findings manifest that the bioavailability and tissue distribution features of aumolertinib are superior to those of osimertinib and gefitinib, providing a pharmacokinetic basis for the clinical application of aumolertinib and the development of next‐generation EGFR‐TKIs.</description><issn>2769-6448</issn><issn>2769-6448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj0FLw0AQRhexYNFe-gvmLLZuktLUc1A8iBT0vkzTSTs1uxN2tgeP_nOTIOLVyzdv4F2eMfPMLjNr83svh3xZ2h4vzDQv1w-L9Wq1ufzDV2amehqMTVnkZTE1X9sjRo-1fHCgxLVCLb7DyCoBpAE8e2kpJg68uwNR9r_PgRoeETDsIR2JI3g8Sb-UcCctJ1LgAF7OSv3uqR3V17fqpYIOE1NIemMmDbZKs597bW6fHt-r50UdRTVS47rIHuOny6wbOt3Q6cbO4l_yN3ocXCI</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Ren, Ran</creator><creator>Zhang, Jiangang</creator><creator>He, Yongpeng</creator><creator>Zeng, Xianghua</creator><creator>Zhou, Yu</creator><creator>Shen, Luyao</creator><creator>Li, Yongsheng</creator><creator>Li, Dairong</creator><creator>Zhao, Huakan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-4594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients</title><author>Ren, Ran ; Zhang, Jiangang ; He, Yongpeng ; Zeng, Xianghua ; Zhou, Yu ; Shen, Luyao ; Li, Yongsheng ; Li, Dairong ; Zhao, Huakan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_700023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jiangang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Yongpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xianghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Luyao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dairong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Huakan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>MedComm - Oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Ran</au><au>Zhang, Jiangang</au><au>He, Yongpeng</au><au>Zeng, Xianghua</au><au>Zhou, Yu</au><au>Shen, Luyao</au><au>Li, Yongsheng</au><au>Li, Dairong</au><au>Zhao, Huakan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients</atitle><jtitle>MedComm - Oncology</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2769-6448</issn><eissn>2769-6448</eissn><abstract>The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), such as osimertinib and gefitinib, aumolertinib have been widely used in EGFR mutation‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the discrepancy of pharmacokinetic features and distributions in important tissues between these EGFR‐TKIs remains obscure. In this study, an ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS/MS) method with specificity and accuracy was established. After a single equivalent dose ratio or equal dose gavage, aumolertinib displayed the shortest elimination half‐life time ( t 1/2 ), while it showed the largest area under the concentration–time curve in mouse plasma and bone marrow among these 3 EGFR‐TKIs. Furthermore, at the time of reaching maximum concentration ( t max ) after single equivalent dose ratio gavage, the concentrations of aumolertinib were significantly higher than that of osimertinib and gefitinib in 9 important tissues of mice. Moreover, after single oral administration, aumolertinib displayed the highest concentration in plasma samples from EGFR mutation‐positive NSCLC patients. Collectively, our findings manifest that the bioavailability and tissue distribution features of aumolertinib are superior to those of osimertinib and gefitinib, providing a pharmacokinetic basis for the clinical application of aumolertinib and the development of next‐generation EGFR‐TKIs.</abstract><doi>10.1002/mog2.70002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-4594</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2769-6448
ispartof MedComm - Oncology, 2024-12, Vol.3 (4)
issn 2769-6448
2769-6448
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mog2_70002
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Pharmacokinetics comparison of aumolertinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and their major metabolites in mouse model and NSCLC patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacokinetics%20comparison%20of%20aumolertinib,%20osimertinib,%20gefitinib%20and%20their%20major%20metabolites%20in%20mouse%20model%20and%20NSCLC%20patients&rft.jtitle=MedComm%20-%20Oncology&rft.au=Ren,%20Ran&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2769-6448&rft.eissn=2769-6448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mog2.70002&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_mog2_70002%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true