The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases
In this report, we present two cases of the bony reconstruction with the medial trochlea (MFT) flap including a skin island that was used to monitor the perfusion of flap in the postoperative period. Between March 2013 and April 2015, we performed surgery on two patients who suffered from scaphoid a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Microsurgery 2017-07, Vol.37 (5), p.431-435 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 435 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 431 |
| container_title | Microsurgery |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Tremp, M. Haumer, A. Wettstein, R. Zhang, Y.X. Honigmann, P. Schaefer, D. J. Kalbermatten, D. F. |
| description | In this report, we present two cases of the bony reconstruction with the medial trochlea (MFT) flap including a skin island that was used to monitor the perfusion of flap in the postoperative period. Between March 2013 and April 2015, we performed surgery on two patients who suffered from scaphoid and talus non‐union after trauma and initial treatment by osteosynthesis. A skin island (1 cm × 1 cm and 3 cm × 1 cm, respectively) was included with the osseous flap (1.6 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm and 2 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm, respectively) to assess the perfusion of the flap. The design of the skin island was based on either the saphenous artery perforator or a cutaneous perforator of the descending genicular artery. Both flaps remained viable throughout the postoperative period, and there were no donor site complications. After a follow‐up of 36 and 11 months, bony union was observed in both patients with a high degree of satisfaction. Thus, a MFT flap with a skin island could be a tool to assess the perfusion of the flap in the early postoperative period. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:431–435, 2017. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/micr.30093 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_micr_30093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MICR30093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2963-272dca416ec916ad87f6e5ed94ba17129f356d8c69678e8402552c57efaeea3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EoqGw8ADIM1KK7cR2PKKKn0pFiKrMketcq4akjuygqhsPwRPyJKQEGJnOcD8dnfshdE7JhBLCrhpnwiQjRGUHKKFEFSmTnB2ihMisSCkp-AidxPhCekRJdYxG_V1SnssEPS3XgBuonK6xhcaHPrvgzboGjW2tW7x13Rpr3PiN63zA8dVtsIu13lSf7x8LaH3osLe423psdIR4io6sriOc_eQYPd_eLKf36fzxbja9nqeGKZH1E1lldE4FGEWFrgppBXCoVL7SVFKmbMZFVRihhCygyAnjnBkuwWoAna2yMbocek3wMQawZRtco8OupKTceyn3XspvLz18McDt26r_9g_9FdEDdAC2robdP1Xlw2y6GEq_AN3Bbv4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tremp, M. ; Haumer, A. ; Wettstein, R. ; Zhang, Y.X. ; Honigmann, P. ; Schaefer, D. J. ; Kalbermatten, D. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tremp, M. ; Haumer, A. ; Wettstein, R. ; Zhang, Y.X. ; Honigmann, P. ; Schaefer, D. J. ; Kalbermatten, D. F.</creatorcontrib><description>In this report, we present two cases of the bony reconstruction with the medial trochlea (MFT) flap including a skin island that was used to monitor the perfusion of flap in the postoperative period. Between March 2013 and April 2015, we performed surgery on two patients who suffered from scaphoid and talus non‐union after trauma and initial treatment by osteosynthesis. A skin island (1 cm × 1 cm and 3 cm × 1 cm, respectively) was included with the osseous flap (1.6 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm and 2 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm, respectively) to assess the perfusion of the flap. The design of the skin island was based on either the saphenous artery perforator or a cutaneous perforator of the descending genicular artery. Both flaps remained viable throughout the postoperative period, and there were no donor site complications. After a follow‐up of 36 and 11 months, bony union was observed in both patients with a high degree of satisfaction. Thus, a MFT flap with a skin island could be a tool to assess the perfusion of the flap in the early postoperative period. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:431–435, 2017.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.30093</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27571547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>compound flap ; Female ; Fractures, Ununited - surgery ; free flap ; Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply ; Free Tissue Flaps - transplantation ; Humans ; Knee ; Male ; medial knee flap ; Middle Aged ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Scaphoid Bone - injuries ; Scaphoid Bone - surgery ; Talus - injuries ; Talus - surgery ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2017-07, Vol.37 (5), p.431-435</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2963-272dca416ec916ad87f6e5ed94ba17129f356d8c69678e8402552c57efaeea3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2963-272dca416ec916ad87f6e5ed94ba17129f356d8c69678e8402552c57efaeea3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmicr.30093$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmicr.30093$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27571547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tremp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettstein, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honigmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalbermatten, D. F.</creatorcontrib><title>The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>In this report, we present two cases of the bony reconstruction with the medial trochlea (MFT) flap including a skin island that was used to monitor the perfusion of flap in the postoperative period. Between March 2013 and April 2015, we performed surgery on two patients who suffered from scaphoid and talus non‐union after trauma and initial treatment by osteosynthesis. A skin island (1 cm × 1 cm and 3 cm × 1 cm, respectively) was included with the osseous flap (1.6 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm and 2 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm, respectively) to assess the perfusion of the flap. The design of the skin island was based on either the saphenous artery perforator or a cutaneous perforator of the descending genicular artery. Both flaps remained viable throughout the postoperative period, and there were no donor site complications. After a follow‐up of 36 and 11 months, bony union was observed in both patients with a high degree of satisfaction. Thus, a MFT flap with a skin island could be a tool to assess the perfusion of the flap in the early postoperative period. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:431–435, 2017.</description><subject>compound flap</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</subject><subject>free flap</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps - transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>medial knee flap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Scaphoid Bone - injuries</subject><subject>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Talus - injuries</subject><subject>Talus - surgery</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAUhS0EoqGw8ADIM1KK7cR2PKKKn0pFiKrMketcq4akjuygqhsPwRPyJKQEGJnOcD8dnfshdE7JhBLCrhpnwiQjRGUHKKFEFSmTnB2ihMisSCkp-AidxPhCekRJdYxG_V1SnssEPS3XgBuonK6xhcaHPrvgzboGjW2tW7x13Rpr3PiN63zA8dVtsIu13lSf7x8LaH3osLe423psdIR4io6sriOc_eQYPd_eLKf36fzxbja9nqeGKZH1E1lldE4FGEWFrgppBXCoVL7SVFKmbMZFVRihhCygyAnjnBkuwWoAna2yMbocek3wMQawZRtco8OupKTceyn3XspvLz18McDt26r_9g_9FdEDdAC2robdP1Xlw2y6GEq_AN3Bbv4</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Tremp, M.</creator><creator>Haumer, A.</creator><creator>Wettstein, R.</creator><creator>Zhang, Y.X.</creator><creator>Honigmann, P.</creator><creator>Schaefer, D. J.</creator><creator>Kalbermatten, D. F.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases</title><author>Tremp, M. ; Haumer, A. ; Wettstein, R. ; Zhang, Y.X. ; Honigmann, P. ; Schaefer, D. J. ; Kalbermatten, D. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2963-272dca416ec916ad87f6e5ed94ba17129f356d8c69678e8402552c57efaeea3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>compound flap</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Ununited - surgery</topic><topic>free flap</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps - transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>medial knee flap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Scaphoid Bone - injuries</topic><topic>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Talus - injuries</topic><topic>Talus - surgery</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tremp, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haumer, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wettstein, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honigmann, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalbermatten, D. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tremp, M.</au><au>Haumer, A.</au><au>Wettstein, R.</au><au>Zhang, Y.X.</au><au>Honigmann, P.</au><au>Schaefer, D. J.</au><au>Kalbermatten, D. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>431-435</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><abstract>In this report, we present two cases of the bony reconstruction with the medial trochlea (MFT) flap including a skin island that was used to monitor the perfusion of flap in the postoperative period. Between March 2013 and April 2015, we performed surgery on two patients who suffered from scaphoid and talus non‐union after trauma and initial treatment by osteosynthesis. A skin island (1 cm × 1 cm and 3 cm × 1 cm, respectively) was included with the osseous flap (1.6 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm and 2 cm × 3 cm × 2 cm, respectively) to assess the perfusion of the flap. The design of the skin island was based on either the saphenous artery perforator or a cutaneous perforator of the descending genicular artery. Both flaps remained viable throughout the postoperative period, and there were no donor site complications. After a follow‐up of 36 and 11 months, bony union was observed in both patients with a high degree of satisfaction. Thus, a MFT flap with a skin island could be a tool to assess the perfusion of the flap in the early postoperative period. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:431–435, 2017.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27571547</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.30093</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0738-1085 |
| ispartof | Microsurgery, 2017-07, Vol.37 (5), p.431-435 |
| issn | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_micr_30093 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | compound flap Female Fractures, Ununited - surgery free flap Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply Free Tissue Flaps - transplantation Humans Knee Male medial knee flap Middle Aged Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Scaphoid Bone - injuries Scaphoid Bone - surgery Talus - injuries Talus - surgery Young Adult |
| title | The medial femoral trochlea flap with a monitor skin island—Report of two cases |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A52%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20medial%20femoral%20trochlea%20flap%20with%20a%20monitor%20skin%20island%E2%80%94Report%20of%20two%20cases&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Tremp,%20M.&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=431-435&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.30093&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMICR30093%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27571547&rfr_iscdi=true |