Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda
Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009, Vol.46 (1), p.1-6 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Nathan, Lisa P. DeLap, Alpha S. Edwards, Phillip M. Freier, Nathan G. |
| description | Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which “IRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/meet.2009.1450460112 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_meet_2009_1450460112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_5L4Q4W03_7</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2102-a7a3733e53c2615c6f3cfa1e7324e148dbef4672e7e19aba2bf777534c1910ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1Kw0AURgdRsFTfwEUewNQ7f5nElVJiW6iKUulymExu2tE0lZnU2re3oaK4c3Xh456zOIRcUBhQAHa1QmwHDCAbUCFBJEApOyI9KiXEKc_gmPQAhIhVquCUnIfwCgA0TbjKeI-MJ01oXbtp3boxdfSMHw63UbE2vgzXUd4unQ2XkcfFpjbdT4hMU0btEvdbQOPtMjILbEpzRk4qUwc8_7598nKXz4bjePo4mgxvp7FlFFhslOGKc5TcsoRKm1TcVoai4kwgFWlZYCUSxVAhzUxhWFEppSQXlmYUEHmfiIPX-nUIHiv97t3K-J2moLsguguiuyD6N8geuzlgW1fj7l-Mvs_z2R9FfFC40OLnj8L4N50orqSeP4y0nIonMQeuFf8CDs91-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nathan, Lisa P. ; DeLap, Alpha S. ; Edwards, Phillip M. ; Freier, Nathan G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Lisa P. ; DeLap, Alpha S. ; Edwards, Phillip M. ; Freier, Nathan G.</creatorcontrib><description>Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which “IRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7870</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-8390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-8390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/meet.2009.1450460112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, Vol.46 (1), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 American Society for Information Science and Technology</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2102-a7a3733e53c2615c6f3cfa1e7324e148dbef4672e7e19aba2bf777534c1910ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27928,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Lisa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLap, Alpha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Phillip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freier, Nathan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda</title><title>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><addtitle>Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech</addtitle><description>Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which “IRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921)</description><issn>0044-7870</issn><issn>1550-8390</issn><issn>1550-8390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1Kw0AURgdRsFTfwEUewNQ7f5nElVJiW6iKUulymExu2tE0lZnU2re3oaK4c3Xh456zOIRcUBhQAHa1QmwHDCAbUCFBJEApOyI9KiXEKc_gmPQAhIhVquCUnIfwCgA0TbjKeI-MJ01oXbtp3boxdfSMHw63UbE2vgzXUd4unQ2XkcfFpjbdT4hMU0btEvdbQOPtMjILbEpzRk4qUwc8_7598nKXz4bjePo4mgxvp7FlFFhslOGKc5TcsoRKm1TcVoai4kwgFWlZYCUSxVAhzUxhWFEppSQXlmYUEHmfiIPX-nUIHiv97t3K-J2moLsguguiuyD6N8geuzlgW1fj7l-Mvs_z2R9FfFC40OLnj8L4N50orqSeP4y0nIonMQeuFf8CDs91-g</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Nathan, Lisa P.</creator><creator>DeLap, Alpha S.</creator><creator>Edwards, Phillip M.</creator><creator>Freier, Nathan G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda</title><author>Nathan, Lisa P. ; DeLap, Alpha S. ; Edwards, Phillip M. ; Freier, Nathan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2102-a7a3733e53c2615c6f3cfa1e7324e148dbef4672e7e19aba2bf777534c1910ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nathan, Lisa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLap, Alpha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Phillip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freier, Nathan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nathan, Lisa P.</au><au>DeLap, Alpha S.</au><au>Edwards, Phillip M.</au><au>Freier, Nathan G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech</addtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0044-7870</issn><issn>1550-8390</issn><eissn>1550-8390</eissn><abstract>Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which “IRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921)</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/meet.2009.1450460112</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0044-7870 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, Vol.46 (1), p.1-6 |
| issn | 0044-7870 1550-8390 1550-8390 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_meet_2009_1450460112 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| title | Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T20%3A41%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Review%20boards:%20Ethics,%20regulations%20and%20the%20research%20agenda&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20for%20Information%20Science%20and%20Technology&rft.au=Nathan,%20Lisa%20P.&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0044-7870&rft.eissn=1550-8390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460112&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_5L4Q4W03_7%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |