Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization
Copolymerizations of ethylene with propene, ethylene with 1‐hexene, and propene with 1‐hexene were performed at 40°C under atmospheric pressure by using the aspecific catalyst composed of TiCl3/MgCl2 and Al(C2H5)3 and the isospecific Solvay‐type catalyst composed of TiCl3 and Cp2Ti(CH3)2. In case of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Die Makromolekulare Chemie 1990-12, Vol.191 (12), p.2853-2864 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2864 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2853 |
container_title | Die Makromolekulare Chemie |
container_volume | 191 |
creator | Soga, Kazuo Uozumi, Toshiya Park, Joon Ryeo |
description | Copolymerizations of ethylene with propene, ethylene with 1‐hexene, and propene with 1‐hexene were performed at 40°C under atmospheric pressure by using the aspecific catalyst composed of TiCl3/MgCl2 and Al(C2H5)3 and the isospecific Solvay‐type catalyst composed of TiCl3 and Cp2Ti(CH3)2. In case of ethylene‐propene copolymerization, the catalyst isospecificity affects neither the monomer reactivity ratios nor the monomer distribution in poly(ethylene‐co‐propene). The thermal properties of poly(ethylene‐co‐propene) are, however, not the same for the two catalysts due to the different tacticity of long propylene sequences contained in the copolymers. In the copolymerizations of ethylene and 1‐hexene and of propene and 1‐hexene, the monomer reactivity ratios differ to some extent between the two catalyst systems. The aspecific catalyst facilitates incorporation of 1‐hexene both in poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐hexene) and poly(propene‐co‐1‐hexene). The monomer distributions are also different in these copolymers. The aspecific and isospecific catalysts show a tendency to give random and blocky copolymers, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/macp.1990.021911201 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_macp_1990_021911201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MACP021911201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-8f2527a22de9026b107946950913fbd699fdfe54aba569c567c3d414e42b91d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKdP4E1foPOcpE0WEGGMOZWpg03cXUjTBKLdUpqC1qd3YzJ26dX54fB9Fx8h1wgDBKA3a23qAUoJA6AoESngCeltP3mKyFenR_ucXMT4AcBQgOiR24lz1rRJcInRra662CY-hlhb4503vu2SsElCZZ3fJCbUoerWtvE_uvVhc0nOnK6ivfq7ffJ2P1mOH9LZ6_RxPJqlhrEhpkNHcyo0paWVQHmBIGTGZQ4SmStKLqUrnc0zXeicS5NzYViZYWYzWkgsOesTtveaJsTYWKfqxq910ykEtQugdgHULoA6BNhSd3vqy1e2-w-inkfj-bEg3Qt8bO33QaCbT8UFE7l6f5mqxRPM-WK5UnP2C28FcMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Soga, Kazuo ; Uozumi, Toshiya ; Park, Joon Ryeo</creator><creatorcontrib>Soga, Kazuo ; Uozumi, Toshiya ; Park, Joon Ryeo</creatorcontrib><description>Copolymerizations of ethylene with propene, ethylene with 1‐hexene, and propene with 1‐hexene were performed at 40°C under atmospheric pressure by using the aspecific catalyst composed of TiCl3/MgCl2 and Al(C2H5)3 and the isospecific Solvay‐type catalyst composed of TiCl3 and Cp2Ti(CH3)2. In case of ethylene‐propene copolymerization, the catalyst isospecificity affects neither the monomer reactivity ratios nor the monomer distribution in poly(ethylene‐co‐propene). The thermal properties of poly(ethylene‐co‐propene) are, however, not the same for the two catalysts due to the different tacticity of long propylene sequences contained in the copolymers. In the copolymerizations of ethylene and 1‐hexene and of propene and 1‐hexene, the monomer reactivity ratios differ to some extent between the two catalyst systems. The aspecific catalyst facilitates incorporation of 1‐hexene both in poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐hexene) and poly(propene‐co‐1‐hexene). The monomer distributions are also different in these copolymers. The aspecific and isospecific catalysts show a tendency to give random and blocky copolymers, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-116X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0025-116X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/macp.1990.021911201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: Hüthig & Wepf Verlag</publisher><ispartof>Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 1990-12, Vol.191 (12), p.2853-2864</ispartof><rights>1990 Hüthig & Wepf Verlag, Basel</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-8f2527a22de9026b107946950913fbd699fdfe54aba569c567c3d414e42b91d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-8f2527a22de9026b107946950913fbd699fdfe54aba569c567c3d414e42b91d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmacp.1990.021911201$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmacp.1990.021911201$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soga, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uozumi, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joon Ryeo</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization</title><title>Die Makromolekulare Chemie</title><addtitle>Makromol. Chem</addtitle><description>Copolymerizations of ethylene with propene, ethylene with 1‐hexene, and propene with 1‐hexene were performed at 40°C under atmospheric pressure by using the aspecific catalyst composed of TiCl3/MgCl2 and Al(C2H5)3 and the isospecific Solvay‐type catalyst composed of TiCl3 and Cp2Ti(CH3)2. In case of ethylene‐propene copolymerization, the catalyst isospecificity affects neither the monomer reactivity ratios nor the monomer distribution in poly(ethylene‐co‐propene). The thermal properties of poly(ethylene‐co‐propene) are, however, not the same for the two catalysts due to the different tacticity of long propylene sequences contained in the copolymers. In the copolymerizations of ethylene and 1‐hexene and of propene and 1‐hexene, the monomer reactivity ratios differ to some extent between the two catalyst systems. The aspecific catalyst facilitates incorporation of 1‐hexene both in poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐hexene) and poly(propene‐co‐1‐hexene). The monomer distributions are also different in these copolymers. The aspecific and isospecific catalysts show a tendency to give random and blocky copolymers, respectively.</description><issn>0025-116X</issn><issn>0025-116X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFKwzAUhoMoOKdP4E1foPOcpE0WEGGMOZWpg03cXUjTBKLdUpqC1qd3YzJ26dX54fB9Fx8h1wgDBKA3a23qAUoJA6AoESngCeltP3mKyFenR_ucXMT4AcBQgOiR24lz1rRJcInRra662CY-hlhb4503vu2SsElCZZ3fJCbUoerWtvE_uvVhc0nOnK6ivfq7ffJ2P1mOH9LZ6_RxPJqlhrEhpkNHcyo0paWVQHmBIGTGZQ4SmStKLqUrnc0zXeicS5NzYViZYWYzWkgsOesTtveaJsTYWKfqxq910ykEtQugdgHULoA6BNhSd3vqy1e2-w-inkfj-bEg3Qt8bO33QaCbT8UFE7l6f5mqxRPM-WK5UnP2C28FcMk</recordid><startdate>199012</startdate><enddate>199012</enddate><creator>Soga, Kazuo</creator><creator>Uozumi, Toshiya</creator><creator>Park, Joon Ryeo</creator><general>Hüthig & Wepf Verlag</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199012</creationdate><title>Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization</title><author>Soga, Kazuo ; Uozumi, Toshiya ; Park, Joon Ryeo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-8f2527a22de9026b107946950913fbd699fdfe54aba569c567c3d414e42b91d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soga, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uozumi, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Joon Ryeo</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Die Makromolekulare Chemie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soga, Kazuo</au><au>Uozumi, Toshiya</au><au>Park, Joon Ryeo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization</atitle><jtitle>Die Makromolekulare Chemie</jtitle><addtitle>Makromol. Chem</addtitle><date>1990-12</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>191</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2853</spage><epage>2864</epage><pages>2853-2864</pages><issn>0025-116X</issn><eissn>0025-116X</eissn><abstract>Copolymerizations of ethylene with propene, ethylene with 1‐hexene, and propene with 1‐hexene were performed at 40°C under atmospheric pressure by using the aspecific catalyst composed of TiCl3/MgCl2 and Al(C2H5)3 and the isospecific Solvay‐type catalyst composed of TiCl3 and Cp2Ti(CH3)2. In case of ethylene‐propene copolymerization, the catalyst isospecificity affects neither the monomer reactivity ratios nor the monomer distribution in poly(ethylene‐co‐propene). The thermal properties of poly(ethylene‐co‐propene) are, however, not the same for the two catalysts due to the different tacticity of long propylene sequences contained in the copolymers. In the copolymerizations of ethylene and 1‐hexene and of propene and 1‐hexene, the monomer reactivity ratios differ to some extent between the two catalyst systems. The aspecific catalyst facilitates incorporation of 1‐hexene both in poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐hexene) and poly(propene‐co‐1‐hexene). The monomer distributions are also different in these copolymers. The aspecific and isospecific catalysts show a tendency to give random and blocky copolymers, respectively.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>Hüthig & Wepf Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/macp.1990.021911201</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-116X |
ispartof | Die Makromolekulare Chemie, 1990-12, Vol.191 (12), p.2853-2864 |
issn | 0025-116X 0025-116X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_macp_1990_021911201 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
title | Effect of catalyst isospecificity on olefin copolymerization |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T06%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20catalyst%20isospecificity%20on%20olefin%20copolymerization&rft.jtitle=Die%20Makromolekulare%20Chemie&rft.au=Soga,%20Kazuo&rft.date=1990-12&rft.volume=191&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2853&rft.epage=2864&rft.pages=2853-2864&rft.issn=0025-116X&rft.eissn=0025-116X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/macp.1990.021911201&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMACP021911201%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |