An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications
A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Limnology and oceanography, methods methods, 2017-08, Vol.15 (8), p.679-689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 679 |
container_title | Limnology and oceanography, methods |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | McLaughlin, Karen Nezlin, Nikolay P. Weisberg, Stephen B. Dickson, Andrew G. Booth, J. Ashley Cash, Curtis L. Feit, Adriano Gully, Joseph R. Johnson, Scott Latker, Ami Mengel, Michael J. Robertson, George L. Steele, Alex Terriquez, Laura |
description | A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and compared them to spectrophotometric measurements on discrete bottle samples collected at two to three depths associated with each cast. Differences ranged from −0.509 to +0.479 with a mean difference of −0.055 pH units. Ninety‐two percent of the measurements were within ± 0.2 pH units, but 1% of the measurements had differences greater than 0.322. Sensor performance was affected by depth, but most of the difference was associated with calibration shortcomings. Sensor drift within a day was negligible; moreover, differences between bottle samples and electrode measurements within a sampling day were smaller than differences across days. Bootstrap analysis indicated that conducting a daily in situ calibration would reduce the mean difference to 0.002 pH units and increase the number of samples within a 0.2 pH unit error to 98%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lom3.10191 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_lom3_10191</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>LOM310191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-cbd40e42a90a14b868fbb265933ba201a84590859c49ad73f2010f0b05269b243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8ASekQL-TeKxqoAipeoCs2W7NjJy7MgOoL49acPAxHS_e3W-OxwAbjG6xwiRh5B6OiUs8BlYYM5wxVten__Jl-CqlI-JFaxpFmC7itB-qfCpRp8iTA4OabRxWno7Zm_gsIHFxpJygT5Ck1QZVYB9in5M2cd3qIYheHOql2tw4VQo9uZ3LsHb0-PrelN1u-eX9aqrDG04rozeM2QZUQIpzHRbt05rUnNBqVYEYdUyLlDLhWFC7RvqphtySCNOaqEJo0twN_81OZWSrZND9r3KB4mRPIqQRxHyJGKC8Qx_-2AP_5Cy223p3PkBVC1gTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>McLaughlin, Karen ; Nezlin, Nikolay P. ; Weisberg, Stephen B. ; Dickson, Andrew G. ; Booth, J. Ashley ; Cash, Curtis L. ; Feit, Adriano ; Gully, Joseph R. ; Johnson, Scott ; Latker, Ami ; Mengel, Michael J. ; Robertson, George L. ; Steele, Alex ; Terriquez, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Karen ; Nezlin, Nikolay P. ; Weisberg, Stephen B. ; Dickson, Andrew G. ; Booth, J. Ashley ; Cash, Curtis L. ; Feit, Adriano ; Gully, Joseph R. ; Johnson, Scott ; Latker, Ami ; Mengel, Michael J. ; Robertson, George L. ; Steele, Alex ; Terriquez, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and compared them to spectrophotometric measurements on discrete bottle samples collected at two to three depths associated with each cast. Differences ranged from −0.509 to +0.479 with a mean difference of −0.055 pH units. Ninety‐two percent of the measurements were within ± 0.2 pH units, but 1% of the measurements had differences greater than 0.322. Sensor performance was affected by depth, but most of the difference was associated with calibration shortcomings. Sensor drift within a day was negligible; moreover, differences between bottle samples and electrode measurements within a sampling day were smaller than differences across days. Bootstrap analysis indicated that conducting a daily in situ calibration would reduce the mean difference to 0.002 pH units and increase the number of samples within a 0.2 pH unit error to 98%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-5856</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lom3.10191</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2017-08, Vol.15 (8), p.679-689</ispartof><rights>2017 Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-cbd40e42a90a14b868fbb265933ba201a84590859c49ad73f2010f0b05269b243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-cbd40e42a90a14b868fbb265933ba201a84590859c49ad73f2010f0b05269b243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2947-2760 ; 0000-0002-1929-6900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flom3.10191$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flom3.10191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezlin, Nikolay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisberg, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, J. Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Curtis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feit, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gully, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latker, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengel, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terriquez, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications</title><title>Limnology and oceanography, methods</title><description>A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and compared them to spectrophotometric measurements on discrete bottle samples collected at two to three depths associated with each cast. Differences ranged from −0.509 to +0.479 with a mean difference of −0.055 pH units. Ninety‐two percent of the measurements were within ± 0.2 pH units, but 1% of the measurements had differences greater than 0.322. Sensor performance was affected by depth, but most of the difference was associated with calibration shortcomings. Sensor drift within a day was negligible; moreover, differences between bottle samples and electrode measurements within a sampling day were smaller than differences across days. Bootstrap analysis indicated that conducting a daily in situ calibration would reduce the mean difference to 0.002 pH units and increase the number of samples within a 0.2 pH unit error to 98%.</description><issn>1541-5856</issn><issn>1541-5856</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURi0EEqWw8ASekQL-TeKxqoAipeoCs2W7NjJy7MgOoL49acPAxHS_e3W-OxwAbjG6xwiRh5B6OiUs8BlYYM5wxVten__Jl-CqlI-JFaxpFmC7itB-qfCpRp8iTA4OabRxWno7Zm_gsIHFxpJygT5Ck1QZVYB9in5M2cd3qIYheHOql2tw4VQo9uZ3LsHb0-PrelN1u-eX9aqrDG04rozeM2QZUQIpzHRbt05rUnNBqVYEYdUyLlDLhWFC7RvqphtySCNOaqEJo0twN_81OZWSrZND9r3KB4mRPIqQRxHyJGKC8Qx_-2AP_5Cy223p3PkBVC1gTg</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>McLaughlin, Karen</creator><creator>Nezlin, Nikolay P.</creator><creator>Weisberg, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Dickson, Andrew G.</creator><creator>Booth, J. Ashley</creator><creator>Cash, Curtis L.</creator><creator>Feit, Adriano</creator><creator>Gully, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Johnson, Scott</creator><creator>Latker, Ami</creator><creator>Mengel, Michael J.</creator><creator>Robertson, George L.</creator><creator>Steele, Alex</creator><creator>Terriquez, Laura</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-2760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-6900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications</title><author>McLaughlin, Karen ; Nezlin, Nikolay P. ; Weisberg, Stephen B. ; Dickson, Andrew G. ; Booth, J. Ashley ; Cash, Curtis L. ; Feit, Adriano ; Gully, Joseph R. ; Johnson, Scott ; Latker, Ami ; Mengel, Michael J. ; Robertson, George L. ; Steele, Alex ; Terriquez, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-cbd40e42a90a14b868fbb265933ba201a84590859c49ad73f2010f0b05269b243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nezlin, Nikolay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisberg, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Booth, J. Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cash, Curtis L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feit, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gully, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latker, Ami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengel, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, George L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terriquez, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McLaughlin, Karen</au><au>Nezlin, Nikolay P.</au><au>Weisberg, Stephen B.</au><au>Dickson, Andrew G.</au><au>Booth, J. Ashley</au><au>Cash, Curtis L.</au><au>Feit, Adriano</au><au>Gully, Joseph R.</au><au>Johnson, Scott</au><au>Latker, Ami</au><au>Mengel, Michael J.</au><au>Robertson, George L.</au><au>Steele, Alex</au><au>Terriquez, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography, methods</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>679</spage><epage>689</epage><pages>679-689</pages><issn>1541-5856</issn><eissn>1541-5856</eissn><abstract>A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and compared them to spectrophotometric measurements on discrete bottle samples collected at two to three depths associated with each cast. Differences ranged from −0.509 to +0.479 with a mean difference of −0.055 pH units. Ninety‐two percent of the measurements were within ± 0.2 pH units, but 1% of the measurements had differences greater than 0.322. Sensor performance was affected by depth, but most of the difference was associated with calibration shortcomings. Sensor drift within a day was negligible; moreover, differences between bottle samples and electrode measurements within a sampling day were smaller than differences across days. Bootstrap analysis indicated that conducting a daily in situ calibration would reduce the mean difference to 0.002 pH units and increase the number of samples within a 0.2 pH unit error to 98%.</abstract><doi>10.1002/lom3.10191</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2947-2760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-6900</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-5856 |
ispartof | Limnology and oceanography, methods, 2017-08, Vol.15 (8), p.679-689 |
issn | 1541-5856 1541-5856 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_lom3_10191 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A57%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20evaluation%20of%20potentiometric%20pH%20sensors%20in%20coastal%20monitoring%20applications&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography,%20methods&rft.au=McLaughlin,%20Karen&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=679&rft.epage=689&rft.pages=679-689&rft.issn=1541-5856&rft.eissn=1541-5856&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lom3.10191&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ELOM310191%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |