The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer

The transfer of energy through zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton is one of the most important interactions in aquatic ecosystems, yet the role of hydrodynamic forces is not fully understood. Factors that influence these interactions include algal size and shape and the interactions between grazer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Limnology and oceanography 2024-12, Vol.69 (S1), p.S54-S66
Hauptverfasser: Goulet, Luc, Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule, Ackerman, Josef Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S66
container_issue S1
container_start_page S54
container_title Limnology and oceanography
container_volume 69
creator Goulet, Luc
Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule
Ackerman, Josef Daniel
description The transfer of energy through zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton is one of the most important interactions in aquatic ecosystems, yet the role of hydrodynamic forces is not fully understood. Factors that influence these interactions include algal size and shape and the interactions between grazer and alga dictated by hydrodynamic forces. Hydrodynamic forcing lead to unimodal relationships in grazer clearance rates (CR) because water motion and turbulence increases encounters but interferes with feeding at high levels. We expect higher CR on small algae due to increased encounter rates caused by vorticity generated in a horizontally oriented rotating cylinder to model increasing turbulence, whereas longer cells, tumbling in the flow, may be more difficult to handle. Ultimately, we expect that increased vorticity will interfere with zooplankton swimming. The CR of Daphnia magna followed the unimodal trend, with higher CR on the small, spherical Chlorella vulgaris than on larger, elongated, and colonial Scenedesmus quadricauda. This was likely due to lower handling time and higher concentration of the smaller cells in the feeding radius around D. magna. The normal hop‐sink swimming behavior of the Daphnia was affected by increasing vorticity; hop frequency decreased, displacement increased, and there was a loss of vertical orientation. This pattern in feeding and swimming were predicted by vorticity. These results for Daphnia differ from those obtained for copepods, which do not respond to vorticity. Given the importance of vorticity in nature, it is relevant to examine grazer feeding interactions under ecologically relevant hydrodynamic conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lno.12590
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_lno_12590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>LNO12590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2640-b61dedf8c2e0c104e662d871095d50de695aeb6675cccbaeb10104f3e52cb56a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j7FOwzAQhi0EEqEw8AZeGdKendhtBgZUQUGK6FJmy7HPbVBIkG1RhafHJaxM90v_d6f7CLllMGcAfNH1w5xxUcEZyVhVVLlI-ZxkqSvzIuVLchXCOwBUQoiM3O8OSNE5NJEOjn4NPramjSMdehpT5RBt2-9PnabOYzgcdURP915_o78mF053AW_-5oy8PT3u1s95vd28rB_q3HBZQt5IZtG6leEIhkGJUnK7WrL0gxVgUVZCYyPlUhhjmhQZJMoVKLhphNTFjNxNd40fQvDo1KdvP7QfFQN18lbJW_16J3Yxsce2w_F_UNWv22njB5YOWdY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goulet, Luc ; Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule ; Ackerman, Josef Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Luc ; Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule ; Ackerman, Josef Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The transfer of energy through zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton is one of the most important interactions in aquatic ecosystems, yet the role of hydrodynamic forces is not fully understood. Factors that influence these interactions include algal size and shape and the interactions between grazer and alga dictated by hydrodynamic forces. Hydrodynamic forcing lead to unimodal relationships in grazer clearance rates (CR) because water motion and turbulence increases encounters but interferes with feeding at high levels. We expect higher CR on small algae due to increased encounter rates caused by vorticity generated in a horizontally oriented rotating cylinder to model increasing turbulence, whereas longer cells, tumbling in the flow, may be more difficult to handle. Ultimately, we expect that increased vorticity will interfere with zooplankton swimming. The CR of Daphnia magna followed the unimodal trend, with higher CR on the small, spherical Chlorella vulgaris than on larger, elongated, and colonial Scenedesmus quadricauda. This was likely due to lower handling time and higher concentration of the smaller cells in the feeding radius around D. magna. The normal hop‐sink swimming behavior of the Daphnia was affected by increasing vorticity; hop frequency decreased, displacement increased, and there was a loss of vertical orientation. This pattern in feeding and swimming were predicted by vorticity. These results for Daphnia differ from those obtained for copepods, which do not respond to vorticity. Given the importance of vorticity in nature, it is relevant to examine grazer feeding interactions under ecologically relevant hydrodynamic conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lno.12590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 2024-12, Vol.69 (S1), p.S54-S66</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2640-b61dedf8c2e0c104e662d871095d50de695aeb6675cccbaeb10104f3e52cb56a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4550-490X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flno.12590$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flno.12590$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45552,45553</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Josef Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>The transfer of energy through zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton is one of the most important interactions in aquatic ecosystems, yet the role of hydrodynamic forces is not fully understood. Factors that influence these interactions include algal size and shape and the interactions between grazer and alga dictated by hydrodynamic forces. Hydrodynamic forcing lead to unimodal relationships in grazer clearance rates (CR) because water motion and turbulence increases encounters but interferes with feeding at high levels. We expect higher CR on small algae due to increased encounter rates caused by vorticity generated in a horizontally oriented rotating cylinder to model increasing turbulence, whereas longer cells, tumbling in the flow, may be more difficult to handle. Ultimately, we expect that increased vorticity will interfere with zooplankton swimming. The CR of Daphnia magna followed the unimodal trend, with higher CR on the small, spherical Chlorella vulgaris than on larger, elongated, and colonial Scenedesmus quadricauda. This was likely due to lower handling time and higher concentration of the smaller cells in the feeding radius around D. magna. The normal hop‐sink swimming behavior of the Daphnia was affected by increasing vorticity; hop frequency decreased, displacement increased, and there was a loss of vertical orientation. This pattern in feeding and swimming were predicted by vorticity. These results for Daphnia differ from those obtained for copepods, which do not respond to vorticity. Given the importance of vorticity in nature, it is relevant to examine grazer feeding interactions under ecologically relevant hydrodynamic conditions.</description><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1j7FOwzAQhi0EEqEw8AZeGdKendhtBgZUQUGK6FJmy7HPbVBIkG1RhafHJaxM90v_d6f7CLllMGcAfNH1w5xxUcEZyVhVVLlI-ZxkqSvzIuVLchXCOwBUQoiM3O8OSNE5NJEOjn4NPramjSMdehpT5RBt2-9PnabOYzgcdURP915_o78mF053AW_-5oy8PT3u1s95vd28rB_q3HBZQt5IZtG6leEIhkGJUnK7WrL0gxVgUVZCYyPlUhhjmhQZJMoVKLhphNTFjNxNd40fQvDo1KdvP7QfFQN18lbJW_16J3Yxsce2w_F_UNWv22njB5YOWdY</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Goulet, Luc</creator><creator>Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule</creator><creator>Ackerman, Josef Daniel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-490X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer</title><author>Goulet, Luc ; Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule ; Ackerman, Josef Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2640-b61dedf8c2e0c104e662d871095d50de695aeb6675cccbaeb10104f3e52cb56a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goulet, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Josef Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goulet, Luc</au><au>Currie, Warren Joseph Sproule</au><au>Ackerman, Josef Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S54</spage><epage>S66</epage><pages>S54-S66</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><abstract>The transfer of energy through zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton is one of the most important interactions in aquatic ecosystems, yet the role of hydrodynamic forces is not fully understood. Factors that influence these interactions include algal size and shape and the interactions between grazer and alga dictated by hydrodynamic forces. Hydrodynamic forcing lead to unimodal relationships in grazer clearance rates (CR) because water motion and turbulence increases encounters but interferes with feeding at high levels. We expect higher CR on small algae due to increased encounter rates caused by vorticity generated in a horizontally oriented rotating cylinder to model increasing turbulence, whereas longer cells, tumbling in the flow, may be more difficult to handle. Ultimately, we expect that increased vorticity will interfere with zooplankton swimming. The CR of Daphnia magna followed the unimodal trend, with higher CR on the small, spherical Chlorella vulgaris than on larger, elongated, and colonial Scenedesmus quadricauda. This was likely due to lower handling time and higher concentration of the smaller cells in the feeding radius around D. magna. The normal hop‐sink swimming behavior of the Daphnia was affected by increasing vorticity; hop frequency decreased, displacement increased, and there was a loss of vertical orientation. This pattern in feeding and swimming were predicted by vorticity. These results for Daphnia differ from those obtained for copepods, which do not respond to vorticity. Given the importance of vorticity in nature, it is relevant to examine grazer feeding interactions under ecologically relevant hydrodynamic conditions.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/lno.12590</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-490X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0024-3590
ispartof Limnology and oceanography, 2024-12, Vol.69 (S1), p.S54-S66
issn 0024-3590
1939-5590
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_lno_12590
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title The effect of vorticity on the feeding of a freshwater grazer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20vorticity%20on%20the%20feeding%20of%20a%20freshwater%20grazer&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Goulet,%20Luc&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S54&rft.epage=S66&rft.pages=S54-S66&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lno.12590&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ELNO12590%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true