Mechanical and radiological assessment of the influence of rhTGFβ-3 on bone regeneration in a segmental defect in the ovine tibia: Pilot study

Limitations in the use of autologous bone graft, which is the gold standard therapy in bone defect healing, drive the search for alternative treatments. In this study the influence of rhTGFβ‐3 on mechanical and radiological parameters of a healing bone defect in the sheep tibia was assessed. In the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2006-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1670-1678
Hauptverfasser: Maissen, Otto, Eckhardt, Christina, Gogolewski, Sylwester, Glatt, Markus, Arvinte, Tudor, Steiner, Adrian, Rahn, Berton, Schlegel, Urs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Limitations in the use of autologous bone graft, which is the gold standard therapy in bone defect healing, drive the search for alternative treatments. In this study the influence of rhTGFβ‐3 on mechanical and radiological parameters of a healing bone defect in the sheep tibia was assessed. In the sheep, an 18‐mm long osteoperiosteal defect in the tibia was treated by rhTGFβ‐3 seeded on a poly(L/DL‐lactide) carrier (n = 4). In a second group (n = 4), the defect was treated by the carrier only, in a third group (n = 4) by autologous cancellous bone graft, and in a fourth group (n = 2) the defect remained blank. The healing process of the defect was assessed by weekly in vivo stiffness measurements and radiology as well as by quantitative computed tomographic assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) every 4 weeks. The duration of the experiment was 12 weeks under loading conditions. In the bone graft group, a marginally significant higher increase in stiffness was observed than in the PLA/rhTGFβ‐3 group (p = 0.06) and a significantly higher increase than in the PLA‐only group (p = 0.03). The radiographic as well as the computed tomographic evaluation yielded significant differences between the groups (p = 0.03), indicating the bone graft treatment (bone/per area, 83%; BMD, 0.57 g/cm3) performing better than the PLA/rhTGFβ‐3 (38%; 0.23 g/cm3) and the PLA‐only treatment (2.5%; 0.09 g/cm3), respectively. Regarding the mechanical and radiological parameters assessed in this study, we conclude that rhTGFβ‐3 has a promoting effect on bone regeneration. However, under the conditions of this study, this effect does not reach the potential of autologous cancellous bone graft transplantation. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:1670–1678, 2006
ISSN:0736-0266
1554-527X
DOI:10.1002/jor.20231